- 4.9/5.0 (12 reviews)
In addition to her Supreme Court experience, Ms. Udell has 20 years of experience representing clients in a wide variety of cases in the federal courts of appeals, including matters involving statutory construction and labor and employment.
Ms. Udell has significant clerkship experience, having clerked on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit for the Honorable Bruce M. Selya; the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the Honorable Jose A. Cabranes; and the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut for the Honorable Robert N. Chatigny.
As a member of the Supreme Court Committee of the National Association of Women Lawyers (NAWL), in 2017, Ms. Udell participated in an extensive evaluation of the qualifications and background of the Honorable Neil McGill Gorsuch, President Trump’s nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court, and in 2016 participated in a similar evaluation of the Honorable Merrick Garland, President Obama’s nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court. She also serves on NAWL’s Amicus Committee and on the U.S. Chamber Litigation Center’s Labor & Employment Litigation Advisory Committee, advising both groups on what cases warrant filing an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court and the federal Courts of Appeals.
During her studies at the University of Connecticut School of Law, Ms. Udell was Editor-in-Chief of the Connecticut Law Review and the recipient of ten academic awards, including the William F. Starr Fellowship Award for Outstanding Scholarship, the University of Connecticut Law School Foundation Award for Exceptional Achievement in Scholarship, two West Publishing Company Awards for Outstanding Overall Scholastic Achievement, two West Publishing Company Corpus Juris Secundum Awards in Contracts and Criminal Law, and four CALI Excellence for the Future Awards in Contracts, Criminal Law, Jurisprudence, and Statutory Interpretation.
Ms. Udell has taught criminal law at the University of Connecticut School of Law.
Pro Bono and Community Involvement
•Pro Bono Panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
•Pro Bono List United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Commentary and Interviews
•Tom Starner, Human Resources Executive, HR on the Docket (Jan. 18, 2018) (discussing Supreme Court cases)
•Vin Gurrieri, Law360, 3 Employment Cases to Watch in 2018 (Jan. 1, 2018)
•Jay-Anne B. Casuga, Bloomberg BNA News, Outlook 2018: Supreme Courta •What’s at Stake for the Workplace (Dec. 12, 2017)
•Jay-Anne B. Casuga, Bloomberg BNA News, Mercedes Dealer Overtime Case Again Gets SCOTUS Review (Sept. 28, 2017)
•Jay-Anne B. Casuga, Bloomberg BNA News, Justices' Labor Docket Light but Significant (Sept. 25, 2017)
•Jay-Anne B. Casuga, Bloomberg BNA News, Orientation Bias, FMLA Retaliation Waiting in Wings for Justices (Sept. 25, 2017)
•Allen Smith, New Supreme Court Justice Will Try To Reduce Federal Agencies’ Influence, Society for Human Resource Management (Apr. 11, 2017)
•Wolters Kluwer, Trump’s High Court Nominee Sparks Sharp Controversy, Employment Law Daily Wrap Up (February 2, 2017)
•Corky Siemaszko, As a Student, SCOTUS Nominee Gorsuch Supported Gays and Opposed Campus Military Recruiters, NBC News (February 1, 2017)
•Allen Smith, In Focus: Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Has Favored Employers in Past Decisions, Society for Human Resource Management (February 1, 2017)
•Jonathan Handel, Hollywood Guilds Silent on Supreme Court Nominee Gorsuch But Management Lawyers Happy, The Hollywood Reporter (January 31, 2017)
•Marcia Coyle, Gorsuch, Drawing Scalia Comparisons, Comes Under Microscope, National Law Journal (January 31, 2017)
•Law360, High Court Term Ends Without Employment Blockbusters (June 28, 2016)
•Wolters Kluwer, 2015 Review-2016 Forecast: High Court Rulings and Beyond, Labor & Employment Law Special Briefing (February 2016)
•CBS Radio News, interviewed by Barry Bagnato to discuss implications of the case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in Hefffernon v. Paterson (January 19, 2016)
•Law360, Workers Edge Out Employers at SCOTUS This Term (June 17, 2015)
•Wolters Kluwer, Supreme Court: 2014 Review-2015 Preview, Labor & Employment Special Briefing (January 2015)
•Supreme Court Review CLE Webinar with Carter Phillips and Adam Liptak, State and Local Legal Center and the International Municipal Lawyers Association, Washington, DC (July 18, 2014)
Honors and Recognitions
•Connecticut Super Lawyers (2018)
•“Second Circuit Holds ‘Hispanic’ Is a Race Under Section 1981 and Title VII,” The National Law Review (2017), available at http://www.natlawreview.com/article/second-circuit-holds-hispanic-race-under-section-1981-and-title-vii [Author]
•“Is Your Volunteer Really an Employee?” Hartford Business Journal (May 11, 2015) [Co-Author]
•“Parsing ERISA’s Equitable Remedies Provision (Montanile v. Board of Trustees),” Connecticut Law Tribune (April 27, 2015) [Author]
•“U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies First Amendment Speech Rights of Government Employees,” The National Law Review (2015), available at http://www.natlawreview.com/article/us-supreme-court-clarifies-first-amendment-speech-rights-government-employees [Author]
•“Employment and Immigration Law: Court Considers Whether Severance Pay Is Taxable (United States v. Quality Stores),” Connecticut Law Tribune (Jan. 23, 2014) [Author]
•“Dissecting Stern v. Marshall,” Law360 (July 7, 2011) [Co-Author]
• Parading the Saurian Tail: Projection, Jung, and the Law, Ariz. L. Rev. Vol. 42 (2000) [Author]
• Intimate Association: Resurrecting a Hybrid Right, Texas J. Women & L. Vol. 7 (1998) [Author], cited in Adler v. Pataki, 185 F.3d 35, 42 (2d Cir. 1999) (Newman, J.)
• Miller v. Albright: Plenary Power, Equal Protection, and the Rights of an Alien Love Child, Geo. Immig. L.J. Vol. 12 (1998) [Author], cited in Herrera-Inirio v. INS, 208 F.3d 299 (1st Cir. 2000)
• Stalking the Wild Lacuna: Communication, Cognition, and Contingency, Law & Ineq. J. Vol. 16 (1998) [Author]
• Same-Sex Sexual Harassment: Cutting the Gordian Knot Cardozo Women’s L.J. Vol. 4 (1998) [Author]
• Signaling a New Direction in Gender Classification Scrutiny: United States v. Virginia Conn. L. Rev. Vol. 29 (1996) [Author]
Speeches and Presentations
•“The Effect of the New Administration on the Federal Judiciary , 2017 CBIA/Jackson Lewis Employment Law Conference (Nov. 15, 2017 and November 30, 2017)
•“Supreme Court Round-Up,” 2016 Jackson Lewis Connecticut Labor & Employment Law Conference (Hartford, CT, June 2016)
•“A Giant Sleeps: The Passing of Justice Scalia and Ramifications for the Labor and Employment Defense Space,” Association of Corporate Counsel (Legal Quick Hit Webinar, April 2016)
•“Supreme Court Update,” 2015 Jackson Lewis Hartford Labor & Employment Law Conference (Cromwell, CT, June 2015)
•“Supreme Court Sampler,” 2014 Jackson Lewis Women’s Employment Law Conference (New York, NY, November 2014)
•“Supreme Court Review CLE Webinar with Carter Phillips and Adam Liptak,” State and Local Legal Center and the International Municipal Lawyers Association (Washington, DC, July 2014)
•“Supreme Court Round-Up,” 2014 Jackson Lewis Connecticut Labor & Employment Law Conference (Hartford, CT, June 2014)
• Supreme Court Round-Up,” 2014 Jackson Lewis Boston Labor & Employment Law Conference (Boston, MA, May 2014)
•“Supreme Court Round-Up,” 2014 Jackson Lewis Government Contractor Symposium (Resdon, VA, May 2014)
• Supreme Court Round-Up,” 2014 Jackson Lewis Government Contractor Symposium (Bethesda, MD, April 2014)
In the News
March 4, 2019
Collin O’Connor Udell Comments on Implications of Title VII’s Administrative Exhaustion Requirements
Collin O’Connor Udell comments on the implications of the amici briefs filed in Fort Bend County v. Lois M. Davis, and whether Title VII’s administrative-exhaustion requirement is a is a prerequisite for going to federal court in EEOC Charge Necessary For Title VII Claims, Justices Told, published by Law360....
October 1, 2018
Bloomberg BNA Big Law Business
Collin O’Connor Udell Comments on Implications of the Mount Lemmon Fire District Age Bias Case
Collin O’Connor Udell comments on implications of Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido, where justices will decide whether the language in the Age Discrimination in Employment Act that applies to private employers, also applies to political subdivisions of a state in Justices Mull Age Bias Law’s Hold on Small...
September 25, 2018
Collin O’Connor Udell and Nadine C. Abrahams Discuss the U.S. Supreme Court's Upcoming 2018-2019 Term
Collin O’Connor Udell and Nadine Abrahams discuss the U.S. Supreme Court's upcoming 2018-2019 term and employment-related cases on the fall docket in Retirement rule to the White House, published by Politico. Subscription may be required to view article
February 27, 2019
U.S. Supreme Court Holds Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) Is Not Subject to Equitable Tolling
In a decision important to class action practice, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), which establishes a 14-day deadline to seek permission to appeal an order granting or denying class certification, is not subject to equitable tolling. Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert, No. 17-1094 (Feb. 26, 2019...
January 16, 2019
Supreme Court: Interstate Transport Companies’ Independent Contractor-Drivers are Exempt from FAA
In New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act’s (FAA) Section 1 exemption applies to transportation workers, regardless of whether they are classified as independent contractors or employees. No. 17-340 (Jan. 15, 2019). By its terms, the FAA does not apply to “contracts of employment of...
November 6, 2018
Supreme Court: Age Discrimination in Employment Act Applies to All State, Local Government Employers
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) applies to state and local government employers, regardless of their size, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in a unanimous (8-0) seven-page decision. Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido, No. 17-587 (Nov. 6, 2018). The Court’s ruling resolves a significant circuit split among the Sixth,...
The EPL Advisor
Second Circuit Holds “Hispanic” Is a Race Under Section 1981 and Title VII
March 9, 2017
On February 16, 2016, the Second Circuit issued an opinion holding that “Hispanic” is a race for the purposes of both Section 1981 and Title VII. Village of Freeport v. Barrella, 814 F.3d 594 (2d Cir. 2016). Judge Jose A.
By Collin O’Connor Udell
Professional Associations and Activities
•National Association of Women Lawyers: Amicus Committee; Supreme Court Committee
•U.S. Chamber Litigation Center (U.S. Chamber of Commerce): Labor & Employment Advisory Committee
•American Bar Association: Council for Appellate Lawyers; Labor and Employment Division
•Connecticut Bar Association: Appellate Advocacy Section; Labor and Employment Section; and Federal Practice Section
You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.