Baton Rouge, LA Health Care Attorneys

2 Applied Filters

Start Comparing

Compare

Baton Rouge, LA Health Care Attorneys

Attorneys (171)

  • Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, L.L.P.
  • Health Care lawyers Serving Baton Rouge, LA and Statewide
  • Our team of healthcare lawyers can help you make sure your practice stays perfect.
    • Peer Reviews
      4.8/5.0 (871)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews
      4.8/5.0 (871)
    •  
  • FisherBroyles, LLP
  • Health Care lawyers Serving Baton Rouge, LA and Nationwide
  • Heathcare Law Experts
    • Peer Reviews
      4.7/5.0 (48)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews
      4.7/5.0 (48)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.7/5.0 (21)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (15)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (16)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (13)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.8/5.0 (13)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.2/5.0 (10)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (12)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.6/5.0 (19)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (2)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.8/5.0 (15)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (22)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.8/5.0 (27)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (2)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (4)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.5/5.0 (1)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (1)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (1)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.6/5.0 (6)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.5/5.0 (18)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (2)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.4/5.0 (0)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.8/5.0 (15)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (1)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (2)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (26)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.7/5.0 (9)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (2)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.8/5.0 (18)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (33)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.5/5.0 (17)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.8/5.0 (55)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (19)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.8/5.0 (29)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (1)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (23)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (3)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.7/5.0 (10)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (16)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.4/5.0 (0)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (1)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.6/5.0 (32)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.8/5.0 (7)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (1)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.8/5.0 (16)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
  • Jean-Paul Perrault
  • Member at McGlinchey Stafford
  • Baton Rouge, LA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      4.8/5.0 (16)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.8/5.0 (16)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.4/5.0 (0)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.4/5.0 (2)
    •  
  • Carl Alexander Barkemeyer
  • Member at Carl Barkemeyer, Criminal Defense Attorney
  • Baton Rouge, LA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (10)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
  • Robert L. Rieger Jr.
  • Partner, Governmental Relations at Adams and Reese LLP
  • Baton Rouge, LA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      4.6/5.0 (5)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.6/5.0 (5)
    •  
  • Daniel Paul Guillory
  • Associate at Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
  • Baton Rouge, LA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
  • Errol J. King Jr
  • Shareholder at Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
  • Baton Rouge, LA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
  • Dean Paul Cazenave
  • Partner at Kean Miller LLP
  • Baton Rouge, LA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (4)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.9/5.0 (4)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
  • Terry Ford Hessick
  • Gen. Coun. at LSU Medical Center-HCSD
  • Baton Rouge, LA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      2.9/5.0 (0)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      2.9/5.0 (0)
    •  
  • Charles A. Schutte Jr.
  • Member at Schutte, Terhoeve, Richardson, Eversberg, Cronin, Judice & Boudreaux
  • Baton Rouge, LA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (1)