Hong Kong, China:

Norton Rose Fulbright

Norton Rose Fulbright
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Peer Reviews
    4.9/5.0 (219)
    Client Reviews
    85% Recommended (13)
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
  • Update your Profile

Areas of Practice (8)

Specific Areas of Practice for our Hong Kong office:

  • General International Practice
  • Commercial Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Taxation
  • Firm Engaged In American
  • International Law Practice
  • Authorized To Appear
  • The Hong Kong Courts Or To Act As Hong Kong Solicitors

Peer Reviews

  • 4.9/5.0 (219 reviews)
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.9/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.9/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.9/5.0
  • Communication

    4.9/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.9/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 Review for Donald Leslie Hunt by a Partner on 12/08/15 in Finance

    Don is a very good lawyer, very ethical and very competent. He is a pleasure to work with.

    Don is a very good lawyer, very ethical and very competent. He is a pleasure to work with. Read less

    Read less
  • 5.0/5.0 Review for Charles D. Schmerler by a Of Counsel on 03/07/15 in Financial Institutions Litigation

    Mr. Schmerler is a superb financial institutions and capital markets lawyer. He has authored a treatise on international insolvency and is facile with a number of areas relating to banks and private equity funds/hedge funds. He has a deep and broad... Read more

    Read more

    Mr. Schmerler is a superb financial institutions and capital markets lawyer. He has authored a treatise on international insolvency and is facile with a number of areas relating to banks and private equity funds/hedge funds. He has a deep and broad understanding of the workings of financial institutions and their litigation matters both domestically and internationally. He is highly respected among members of the financial community. Read less

    Read less

See All 219 Reviews »


*Attorneys who only have peer reviews prior to April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

  • 4.3/5.0 (13 reviews)
  • 85% (11 recommendations)
  • Communication

    4.4/5.0
  • Responsiveness

    4.3/5.0
  • Quality of Service

    4.4/5.0
  • Value for Money

    3.8/5.0
Disclaimer