When the Adams and Reese Environmental and Toxic Tort Team takes on your case, we are there in the moments following a catastrophic incident and we will see you through to its resolution. The information we obtain in those first critical hours gives you the best chance of understanding the cause and responsible parties as well as your rights under the law. Over the past 15 years, we have developed a repository of cases and evidence that helps us to move quickly on similar incidents and matters. The result is cost-effective and logical representation in an often high-stakes environment.
The firm’s related work in environmental, forestry, real estate, insurance and energy law supports our ability to quickly discern the contractual, regulatory or liability factors that could prove critical in litigation. We assist in drafting and reviewing agreements and advising on compliance to help you avoid costly litigation in the future — or manage claims effectively with proper protections. Keeping clients and in-house counsel involved throughout the process, we bring all of our firm knowledge and experience to bear in the environmental arena.
Adams and Reese attorneys have represented clients in all manner of environmental permitting, transport and disposal matters as well as toxic tort litigation. This has ranged from unique experience with boiler systems and petrochemicals to the handling of more than 10,000 asbestos cases. We also have acted as national counsel for leading petrochemical, pharmaceutical and agricultural chemical companies for many years.
Our attorneys have engineering, science, military and medical backgrounds. We collaborate across offices and practices to collect the proper documentation, testimony and evidence. Involvement in leading litigation defense organizations such as DRI helps us to keep pace with the latest strategies and theories from the plaintiff’s side.
The firm represents clients in all environmental issues. This includes representation in regulatory compliance, including OSHA, permitting and administrative hearings and enforcement proceedings before local, state and federal environmental and agencies. It advises clients on compliance issues on potential environment liabilities. Our attorneys also have substantial experience in litigation of environmental and toxic tort issues.
Core Practice and Clients
Providing representation and ongoing counsel to industries such as forestry and transportation, maritime and offshore, oil and gas and energy, construction, agriculture and real estate, Adams and Reese offers vast experience with relevant state, U.S. and international environmental statutes.
Our primary services include:
Latent Defense: representing defendants in cases where plaintiffs may have been exposed to potentially harmful chemicals or substances years before they actually show disease or injury. This includes expert testimony as to actual medical causation.
Mature and Emerging Toxic Torts: providing deep experience in the proper defense against claims of bodily injury or harm from substances that are known and well studied and those whose effects on the human body are either not conclusive or not broadly recognized. Claims for bodily injury, mental/emotional injury and medical monitoring resulting from alleged exposure to asbestos and other toxins continue to be filed in unprecedented numbers. Both "mature" (e.g., asbestos) and "emerging" (e.g., latex gloves) toxic torts fall within the experience of the Adams and Reese Asbestos and Toxic Tort Team. Significantly, our firm has been involved in the development of defenses to latent disease injuries, such as those caused by silica or asbestos. These defenses require experience in law that is inapplicable in other cases. This is because the courts may look to and apply the law in effect at the time of the harmful exposure, which may have been 20 to 50 years earlier. Our attorneys provide the experience, manpower and technology necessary to defend toxic tort claims ranging from individual plaintiffs to multi-party mass tort litigation. Our attorneys have served as local, regional and national counsel to a large variety of manufacturers, distributors and users of products targeted in toxic tort litigation. We have experience in defending clients involved in asbestos, grain dust, silica, welding rods, benzene, implants, latex gloves, pesticides and other chemicals. This experience extends to the proper handling and strategies to be employed to defend and develop legal and factual issues, as well as medical causation. We have assembled a repository of medical, scientific and technical information and we have access to a network of highly respected consultants and experts. Our team approach allows the firm's clients to benefit from a wealth of information and resources.
Mass Tort Litigation: representing clients in complex and multi-party litigation in which the case may involve hundreds of plaintiffs in multiple jurisdictions. We are experienced in summary judgment motions to aid in the efficient resolution of these cases as well as national trial counsel.
Due Diligence/Transactions: assisting with obtaining and interpreting Phase I, II and III environmental site assessments, tax, title and rights analysis; negotiating and drafting agreements for development, acquisition, sale and financing as well as representing real property agreements.
Statutory Counsel: including the interpretation of various statutes on air quality, water quality, solid and hazardous waste management, remedial and corrective actions, toxins, land use planning and zoning, flood insurance exemptions, wetlands policy, mineral law, coastal zone management, underground injection, oilfield waste and hazardous materials transportation.
Whether you need legal counsel to interpret an existing law or emerging piece of environmental legislation, or you are facing a costly and complex mass tort claim, Adams and Reese has the resources and experience to navigate the regulatory and judicial terrain.
5.0/5.0 by a Associate on 03/02/12
5.0/5.0 by a Chief Legal Officer on 03/02/12
5.0/5.0 by a Member on 05/07/14
5.0/5.0 by a Sole Practitioner on 03/13/13
5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 03/04/12
5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 08/17/12
5.0/5.0 by a Of Counsel on 03/15/12
Mr. Wolf represented a friend in a matter last year before the New Orleans City Council. He did very good work and communicated properly and well with... Read more
Mr. Wolf represented a friend in a matter last year before the New Orleans City Council. He did very good work and communicated properly and well with all parties. I commend him for his skills and effort even though he was ultimately unsuccessful.
5.0/5.0 by a Of Counsel on 05/12/10
5.0/5.0 by a Member on 05/07/12
5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 05/23/14
5.0/5.0 on 02/16/09
5.0/5.0 on 02/22/17
5.0/5.0 on 02/16/09
5.0/5.0 on 09/13/13
5.0/5.0 on 04/25/11
Bill Brabec is an aggressive litigator. Bill has provided Mississippi Valley Title Insurance Company with great legal representation in complex litig... Read more
Bill Brabec is an aggressive litigator. Bill has provided Mississippi Valley Title Insurance Company with great legal representation in complex litigation matters. Bill Brabec is capable of handling the most complicated legal issues.
5.0/5.0 on 11/05/15
I've known Chris since college. He's bright, conscientious, and honest. I referred PI, a condo issue and got a recommendation on FL probate through hi... Read more
I've known Chris since college. He's bright, conscientious, and honest. I referred PI, a condo issue and got a recommendation on FL probate through him.
If he has a serious weakness, it is one that is almost like a parody of something a narcissist (not Chris - he's the kind of chap I'd like my teenaged daughter to marry - if one could look past the age difference of course) would say when asked his weakness during an interview. He avoids over-promising.
5.0/5.0 on 06/08/09
4.8/5.0 on 08/26/10
1.3/5.0 on 12/08/12
I contacted Mr Harwell to represent me in a landlord dispute. He wrote one letter of demand to my landlord, and when he received a counter demand, he... Read more
I contacted Mr Harwell to represent me in a landlord dispute. He wrote one letter of demand to my landlord, and when he received a counter demand, he immediately told me there would be no more pro bono work, this lawsuit would be expensive and time-consuming to litigate, and would not be worth it. I found him unprofessional and dismissive. I subsequently filed a counterclaim myself, and the landlord dropped their suit. I was totally unimpressed with Mr Harwell, and would recommend against him.
5.0/5.0 on 07/15/11
We used the office in Baton Rouge, they were very helpful and friendly. Read more