Shareholder Merger Litigation

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP places special emphasis on prosecuting shareholder class actions brought nationwide against officers, directors and other parties responsible for corporate wrongdoing. Most of these cases are based upon state statutory or common law principles involving fiduciary duties owed to investors by corporate insiders as well as Exchange Act violations. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has obtained significant monetary and therapeutic recoveries, including millions of dollars in increased merger consideration for public shareholders; additional disclosure of significant material information so that shareholders can make informed decision regarding a buyout and other types of therapeutic relief designed to increase competitive bids and protect shareholder value.  As noted by Judge Timothy S. Black of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in appointing lead counsel Nichting v. DPL Inc., Case No. 3:11-cv-14 (S.D. Ohio), "[a]lthough all of the firms seeking appointment as Lead Counsel have impressive resumes, the Court is most impressed with Faruqi & Faruqi.”

As class counsel Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has had many successes: Kajaria v. Cohen, No. 1:10-CV-03141 (N.D. Ga., Atlanta Div.)(obtaining additional disclosure by court order regarding the Bluelinx Holdings Inc., tender offer); In re Bausch & Lomb Inc. Buyout Litig., Index No. 07/6384 (N.Y. Supr. Ct., Monroe Cty. 2008) (obtaining disclosure to shareholders of critical material information concerning its merger with Warburg Pincus LLC); Rice v. Lafarge North America, Inc., et al., No. 268974-V (Montgomery Cty., Md. Circuit Ct.)(obtaining a price increase with the special committee in the Lafarge North America (“LNA”) buyout in the amount of $388 million); In re: Hearst-Argyle Shareholder Litig., Lead Case No. 09-Civ-600926 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.)(obtaining a price increase in coordination with the special committee of over 12.5%, or $8,740,648 in the Hearst-Argyle’s buyout); In re Alfa Corp. Shareholder Litig., Case No. 03-CV-2007-900485.00 (Montgomery Cty, Ala. Cir. Ct.)( obtaining a price increase in coordination with the special committee in the Alfa buyout to $22.00 from the originally-proposed $17.60 per share offer (160 million in the aggregate) as well as additional proxy disclosures); In re Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. S'holders Litig., Consolidated C.A. No. 1033-N (Del. Ch. 2005)(obtaining a price increase in coordination with the special committee of $450 million in the Fox Entertainment buyout); In re Howmet Int’l S’holder Litig., Consolidated C.A. No. 17575 (Del. Ch. 1999) (coordinating with Howmet’s special committee obtained an increased benefit of $61.5 million dollars for the shareholders).

Lastly, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, is committed to bringing novel post close cases in Delaware Chancery Court to seek damages as a result of an unfair buyout and has recently handled a number of high profile cases such as In re Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. Shareholder Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. 6164-VCP (Del. Ch. March 24, 2011); In re Cogent S’holder Litig., C.A. No. 5780-VCP (Del. Ch. 2010); In re Massey Energy Company Derivative and Class Action Litig., C.A. No, 5430-CS (Del. Ch. 2010); In re Novell, Inc. S’holder Litig., Consol. C.A. No. 6032-VCN (Del. Ch. 2010);  In re Playboy Enterprises, Inc. S’holders Litig., Consol. C.A. No. 5632-VCN (Del. Ch. 2010); In re MFW S’holder Litig., Consol. C.A. No. 6566-CS (Del. Ch. 2011); In re BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. S’holders Litig., Consol. C.A. No. 6623-VCN (Del. Ch. 2011); In re Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. S’holder Litig., Consol. C.A. No. 7122-CS (Del. Ch. 2011).

Locations (1)

People (25)

Peer Reviews

  • 5.0/5.0

*Attorneys who only have peer reviews prior to April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

This firm’s attorneys do not have client reviews.

Documents ({{amountArticles}})

Documents by this Organization on
Other documents: ,


Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is committed to equal employment opportunities.  We are a firm founded by minorities and will not discriminate against employees or applicants for employment on any legally-recognized basis including, but not limited to: veteran status, uniform servicemember status, race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, physical or mental disability, genetic information or any other protected class under the federal, state or local laws.  Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is also committed to providing equal employment opportunities to qualified individuals with disabilities.

We strive to create the best possible climate for maximum development and goal achievement for all employees. Our practice is to treat each employee as an individual.  We seek to develop a spirit of teamwork; individuals working together to attain a common goal.  In order to maintain an atmosphere where these goals can be accomplished, we provide a comfortable and progressive workplace.  Most importantly, we have a workplace where communication is open and problems can be discussed and resolved in a mutually respectful atmosphere.

Contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

Please correct the fields highlighted in red.

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.