Environmental Remediation and Superfund

Thirty years after the enactment of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), environmental remediation sites continue to pose significant management challenges for our clients. On one hand, cost-containment requires that lawyers and clients not reinvent the wheel at remediation sites. On the other hand, business as usual can overlook opportunities to avoid or recover costs through innovative approaches.

Our Environmental Remediation and Superfund team has represented clients at over 200 significant remediation sites throughout the U.S. We have achieved numerous favorable results for our clients, with national implications, as a result of negotiations or litigation involving the EPA, DOJ, state agencies or third parties. These results range from brownfield development and sale of formerly contaminated property, obtaining no action letters from EPA, successful dispositive motions, cost-recovery and contribution judgments in favor of clients, and environmental insurance recoveries. We have been successful in assisting the EPA and DOJ in expanding the base of potentially responsible parties (PRPs) at a site, in bringing the U.S. into sites as a PRP, and in recovering substantial sums for clients in innovative ways.

Once our client commences environmental response activities under the terms of an Administrative Consent Order or judicial Consent Decree, they are, in essence, running a business at the site. Based on our nationwide experience at remediation sites for more than 25 years, we provide practical and strategic advice concerning the myriad of issues that can arise at such sites. This advice includes negotiating cleanup agreements with federal and state agencies and third parties; negotiation of access issues that significantly impact liability and cost; strategic remedy revision; advice on regulatory compliance matters; decision-making within the context of ongoing litigation (including toxic tort suits); coordination with public relations professionals; and identification of cost recovery opportunities.

Representative Projects

  • Representation of clients at Superfund and state-lead remediation sites, as sole PRP, principal PRP, one of many PRPs or de minimis PRP
  • Obtained ruling of EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board that client was not liable as an arranger under CERCLA §107(a)(3), and awarded client reimbursement from the Superfund for costs incurred in responding to a unilateral order under CERCLA §106 
  • Obtained district court ruling that potentially responsible parties may bring cost recovery actions under CERCLA §107 
  • Obtained district court ruling that client could suspend its obligations under a CERCLA Consent Decree based upon conduct of EPA found to be a repudiation of the Consent Decree 
  • Obtained district court ruling upholding contribution protection in private party CERCLA settlements 
  • Defeated CERCLA arranger liability claims at transformer recycling sites by establishing that our clients were sellers of useful products 
  • Achieved settlements at two National Priorities List (NPL) sites assessing substantial contribution shares against the U.S. government as a PRP 
  • Contribution litigation at several Superfund sites resulting in substantial reduction of client’s proposed allocation 
  • Added hundreds of additional PRPs to an oil recycling site, followed by settlements through a voluntary allocation process 
  • Supported successful brownfield development at property located at or adjacent to Superfund sites

Locations (1)

People (576)

Peer Reviews

  • 4.8/5.0 (466)
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.8/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.8/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.8/5.0
  • Communication

    4.8/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.8/5.0

See All 134 Reviews See All 134 Reviewed Attorneys »


*Attorneys who only have peer reviews prior to April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

  • 4.4/5.0 (14)
  • 86% (12)
  • Communication

    4.5/5.0
  • Responsiveness

    4.5/5.0
  • Quality of Service

    4.4/5.0
  • Value for Money

    4.2/5.0

See All 14 Reviews See All 14 Reviewed Attorneys »

Disclaimer

Documents ({{amountArticles}})

Documents by this Organization on Martindale.com
Other documents: ,

Diversity

Husch Blackwell is committed to recruiting, developing, retaining, and promoting talented attorneys and staff. We believe diversity encompasses a variety of characteristics, including race, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, education, and family and marital status.
 

Our environment is essential to both the quality of our client service and the personal satisfaction of our lawyers and staff.
 

Our efforts have been recognized both nationally and locally in promoting diversity. We received a top rating of 100 percent in the Corporate Equality Index, the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, the Equal Justice Award, Legal Services of Eastern Missouri, and named one of the Top 100 Law Firms for Women by MultiCultural Law Magazine.
 

Minority and female partners hold senior leadership positions in management, which fully supports the wide variety of initiatives coordinated by our firm’s Diversity Committee.
 

We are actively involved in promoting diversity within the legal profession. Our firm endorsed the diversity commitment and action plans of our local bar associations.
 

Diversity and inclusiveness make us a stronger firm and better able to understand our clients’ needs. We are committed to pursue, promote and enhance diversity at Husch Blackwell.

  1. Knowledge Management

    • Does the firm have a knowledge management program? Yes
  2. Disaster Recovery

    • Does the firm have a disaster recovery plan in place? Yes
  3. Matter Budgeting and Financial Management

    • Does the firm establish formal budgets for client engagements? Yes
    • Are bills submitted electronically? Yes
  4. Vendor Management

    • Does the firm have preferred vendor relationships? Yes
  5. Litigation General Best Practices

    • Does the firm have a formalized new associate litigation training/mentoring program? Yes
    • Does the firm's litigation department have a structured approach to early case assessment? For example: Does your firm implement a standard approach to determine risks and strengths early in a case to assess trial or settlement options? Yes
    • Does the firm have an established records management team to assist clients with records retention, compliance and litigation preparedness? Yes
  6. Quality Management

    • Does the firm conduct end of matter reviews? Yes
  7. Litigation eDiscovery Best Practices

    • Does your firm have any educational programs designed to address the changing federal rules of civil procedure? Yes
    • Does the firm have a standardized litigation hold program in place for its clients? Yes

Contact Husch Blackwell LLP

Please correct the fields highlighted in red.

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.


You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.