• Defending Insurer is not Bound by Insured’s Stipulated Excess Judgment Made Without the Insurer’s Participation or Commitment to Pay the Insured’s Part of the Judgment
  • February 23, 2016 | Author: David M. Plouff
  • Law Firm: Morris Polich & Purdy LLP - San Diego Office
  • A California court of appeal held that an insurer that defended its insured in a personal injury action under one policy but refused to defend under two others was not liable for an excess stipulated judgment that the insured had assigned to the plaintiff.