• Arbitration Update: California Court Severs Unconscionable Provisions But Enforces Arbitration Agreement
  • March 6, 2012 | Authors: Emily J. Bordens; Michael T. Hensley; Dennis Kadian; Andrée Peart Laney; Jed L. Marcus; Tracey Salmon-Smith
  • Law Firms: Bressler, Amery & Ross A Professional Corporation - New York Office ; Bressler, Amery & Ross A Professional Corporation - Florham Park Office ; Bressler, Amery & Ross A Professional Corporation - New York Office ; Bressler, Amery & Ross A Professional Corporation - Florham Park Office ; Bressler, Amery & Ross A Professional Corporation - New York Office ; Bressler, Amery & Ross A Professional Corporation - Florham Park Office
  • An instructive decision of a U.S. District Court in California, Laughlin v. VMWare, Inc., No. 11-cv-00530, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12262 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2012), granted an employer’s motion to compel arbitration of its employee’s claims, despite its ruling that the employer’s arbitration clause was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable.