- 11th Circuit Reverses NLRB in Independent Contractor Case
- March 2, 2016 | Author: Guy Farmer
- Law Firm: GrayRobinson, P.A. - Jacksonville Office
- On February 3, 2016, the court of appeals for the 11th Circuit recently overturned an NLRB decision that stated a company who refers stagehands to producers of concerts, sporting events and other live events in the Atlanta area was their employer. (Crew One Production, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Case No. 15-10429)
In 2014, the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees union sought to represent the stagehands who contract with the referral service. The NLRB determined that the stagehands were employees of the referral service, directed an election and certified the union as the bargaining representative of the stagehands. The referral service refused to bargain with the union, the NLRB ruled that the company committed an unfair labor practice by doing so and the company appealed.
The 11th Circuit vacated the NLRB’s decision, ruling that the stagehands were independent contractors and therefore, the NLRB lacked jurisdiction over the case. The court noted “the Board has no authority whatsoever over independent contractors.” The court also found it to be “well settled that the common law of agency governs” the determination of whether an individual is an employee or independent contractor. The court listed multiple factors under the common law agency test but ruled that the most critical factor was the extent of control the company exercises over the details of the work.
The Court ruled the test for control “takes into account the degree of supervision, the entrepreneurial interests of the agent and any other relevant factors.” It also distinguished between “control over the manner and means of the agent’s performance and the details of the work,” which is relevant, and “mere economic control or control over the end result of the performance,” which is not. Applying those factors, the court determined that only the event producers and touring crews control the means of the work performed by the stagehands, and the referral company lacked the expertise to direct the stagehands in their work for any particular client.
While control is the most important factor, the court also noted there were several other indicia of independent contractor status, including the fact that the referral company did not withhold taxes or provide benefits, the stagehands signed agreements with the service which indicated they were independent contractors, the fact that the stagehands used their own tools, and that insurance was provided by the clients, not the referral service.
This 11th Circuit decision provides useful guidance for Florida companies who are using independent contractors and is a setback for the NLRB in its current effort to eliminate independent contractor status.