• Res Ipsa Loquitur Claim Dismissed By Trial Court But Permitted on Appeal For Injury When Sprinklers Turned On.
  • July 13, 2017 | Author: Alicia M. Smith
  • Law Firm: Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C. - Cherry Hill Office
  • The trial court ruling that res ipsa loquitur was inapplicable was reversed because expert testimony was required to determine why or how the sprinkler system could turn on. The plaintiff claimed she was injured when a ground-level sprinkler system turned on unexpectedly and jammed the wheels of her roller blades. The appellate court found that res ipsa loquitur applied as there were multiple defendants and the defendants had testified that the sprinkler would have to be manually reset to operate at a time other than when set by the contractor for between midnight and 4:30 a.m.