• Supreme Court Reaffirms Narrow Interpretation of Ohio's EIT Safety Guard Provision
  • January 8, 2015 | Author: Thomas J. Cabral
  • Law Firm: Gallagher Sharp LLP - Cleveland Office
  • Today, December 18, 2014, in Pixley v. Pro-Pak Industries, Inc., the Supreme Court of Ohio found that the mere failure of an equipment safety guard is not sufficient to create a rebuttable presumption that an employer intended to injure its employee.