Vincent H. Chieffo

Vincent H. Chieffo: Attorney with Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Shareholder; Co-Chair, National Media and Entertainment Litigation Group at Greenberg Traurig, LLP (1800 Attorneys)
  • 1840 Century Park East, Suite 1900, Los Angeles, CA 90067-2121
    View Vincent H. Chieffo's office location
  • Peer Reviews
    5.0/5.0
    Client Reviews
    No Reviews
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]

Biography

Vincent H. Chieffo is an entertainment and media litigator with significant trial and appellate experience. His practice also includes entertainment transactional work. His litigation experience encompasses disputes throughout the entertainment business, including those involving copyright and trademark infringement, right of publicity, defamation, the rights of estates and heirs in copyrights and other entertainment assets, idea submission, royalties and participations, and distribution and financing agreements. Vincent's entertainment transaction experience has included advice regarding a wide range of matters from licensing trademarks, copyrights, and rights of publicity; sales and acquisitions of copyright and entertainment catalogues; to music publishing agreements; and motion picture production and distribution agreements.

Concentrations

•Litigation
•Entertainment law
•Intellectual property

Clerkships

•Hon. Wilfred Feinberg, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1970-1971

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, Entertainment Law - Motion Pictures and Television, Music; Litigation - Intellectual Property; Media Law, 2010-2018
•Listed, Super Lawyers magazine, Southern California Super Lawyers, 2007, 2009-2017
•Listed, Managing IP Magazine's World IP Handbook and Survey, IP Stars, 2013-2017
•Recognized, Los Angeles Business Journal, The Most Influential Property Lawyers in Los Angeles, 2017
•Listed, The International Who's Who of Sports & Entertainment Lawyers, 2013-2014
•Team Member, U.S. News - Best Lawyers Law Firm of the Year in Entertainment Law - Music, 2011-2012
•Rated, AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5

AV , AV Preeminent , Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies.

Areas of Practice (2)

  • Media & Entertainment Litigation
  • Gaming

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
310.586.7731  Phone
310.586.0231  Fax
www.gtlaw.com/People/Vincent-H-Chieffo
University Attended:
Hamilton College, A.B., 1967
Law School Attended:
Columbia Law School, J.D., magna cum laude, 1970
Year of First admission:
1971
Admission:
1971, California; Supreme Court of the United States; U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; U.S. District Court for the Central District of California; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California; U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California; U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Memberships:

Professional & Community Involvement

•Member, American Bar Association
•Member, Beverly Hills Bar Association
•Member, Board of Directors of Public Counsel, a public interest law firm
•Member, Century City Bar Association
•Member, Copyright Society of the U.S.A.
•Member, International Bar Association
•Member, Los Angeles County Bar Association, Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition Section
•Past President, Los Angeles Copyright Society
•Member, Association of Business Trial Lawyers Los Angeles
•Member, USC Entertainment Law Institute Planning Committee

Birth Information:
New York, New York, October 5, 1945
Reported Cases:
Experience: Litigation: Gray v. Perry, 2:15-cv-05642-CAS (JCx), 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50803 (C.D. Cal. April 3, 2017), granting a defense partial summary judgment in a copyright infringement action.; Roberts v. Gordy, 181 F. Supp. 3d 997 (S.D. Fla. 2016), dismissal of copyright infringement action for lack of a valid copyright registration and for lack of standing.; Branca v. Heal the World Found., 568 Fed. Appx. 521 (9th Cir. 2014), affirming district court's denial of relief under Rule 60(b) that had attached a judgment obtained on behalf of the personal representatives of the Estate of Michael Jackson.; Moreau v. Daily Independent, 2013 WL 85362, 41 Med. L. Rep. 1471 (E.D. Cal. 2013), granting anti-SLAPP motion and dismissing defamation claim against newspaper.; National Center for Jewish Film v. Riverside Films LLC, 2012 WL 4052111, 2012 Copr. L. Dec. P. 30, 316 (C.D. Cal., 2012), granting defense summary judgment on fair use grounds in copyright infringement action based on film clips used by the producer of a documentary film about Sholem Aleichem.; RST (2005) Inc. v. Research in Motion Ltd., 597 F. Supp.2d 362 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), granting, in part, summary judgment to plaintiff in dispute arising from license agreement for a Rolling Stones branded, limited edition Blackberry smartphone.; Silverlit Toys Manufactory, Ltd. V. Absolute Toy Marketing, Inc ., 2007 WL 521239 (N.D. Cal. 2007), granting preliminary injunction for copyright and trademark infringement.; Polygram Records, Inc. v. Legacy Entertainment Group, LLC, 2006 WL 163223 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006), affirming summary judgment that held Heirs of Hank Williams Sr. are exclusive owners of exploitation rights to Hank Williams recorded radio programs.; Lyrick Studios, Inc. v. Big Idea Productions, Inc., 420 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2005), reversal of breach of distribution agreement, $10 million jury verdict.; Briarpatch Ltd. L.P. v. Phoenix Pictures, Inc., 373 F.3d 296 (2d Cir. 2004) cert. denied 544 U.S. 949 (2005), copyright infringement.; Winter v. D.C. Comics, 30 Cal.4th 881 (2003), right of publicity.; Adidas-Salomon AG v. Target Corp., 228 F.Supp. 2d 1192 (D. Oregon 2002), trademark.; Fogerty v. Fantasy, 510 U.S. 57 (1994) on remand, 94 F.3d 553 (9th Cir. 1996), copyright infringement and right to attorney's fees.; Schwartz v. Las Vegas Sun, 104 Nev. 508, 761 P.2d 849 (1988) and 110 Nev. 1042, 881 P.2d 638 (1994), defamation.; Stone v. Williams, 970 F.2d 1043 (2d Cir. 1992) and Stone v. Gulf America Fire & Casualty Co. 554 So. 2d. 346 (Alabama 1989), right of illegitimate child of Hank Williams Sr. to renewal U.S. copyrights and to share in the Estate of Hank Williams Sr.; Demaris v. Greenspun, 712 F.2d. 433 (9th Cir. 1983), defamation.; Cher v. Forum International Ltd., 692 F.2d 634 (9th Cir. 1982), right of publicity.; H.M. Greenspun v. Del E. Webb Corporation, 634 F. 2d 1204 (9th Cir. 1980), shareholder derivative action.; Guglielmi v. Spelling-Goldberg Prods, 25 Cal.3d 860 (1979), right of publicity.; Entertainment Transactional: Represented various clients who have granted or obtained trademark licenses, name and likeness rights, and literary rights including the licensing of personal rights for the production of a television movie, the grant of syndication rights for television programming, the sale of theatrical rights to a best-selling novel, the sale and optioning of screenplays, and the negotiation of a multimillion-dollar endorsement and concert tour promotion agreement.; Represented strategic partners in several mini-major studio international partnerships involving equity investments, multi-picture revolving lines of credit for up to $300 million and single picture financing.; Represented music publishing companies, including copyright catalog acquisitions, and various recording artists and independent record companies regarding recording, production and distribution agreements, and royalty accountings.; Represented musical and performing artists for single and multi-engagement tours, for tour and retail merchandising agreements, and for tour promotion agreements.
ISLN:
908410789

Peer Reviews

  • 5.0/5.0
  • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

This attorney does not have client reviews.
Disclaimer

Documents ({{amountArticles}})

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
Other documents: ,

Los Angeles, California

Contact Vincent H. Chieffo

Please correct the fields highlighted in red.

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.


You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.