- 5.0/5.0 (2 reviews)
"Surviving Allegations of Professional Misconduct" (with Stephen M. Goldman), Washington Lawyer, Oct. 2004.
"Defense Counsel and Coverage Implications of the Tripartite Relationship", Coverage (a publication of the Committee on Insurance Coverage Litigation of the American Bar Association's Section of Litigation), November/December 2003.
News about Danny M. Howell:
• D. C. Regional Law Office Relocates
Board Member, Center for Auto Safety
reversed, 2014 Va. Unpub. LEXIS 29, *1 (Va. Oct. 3, 2014) (McClanahan, Chief J. dissenting)
affirmed, Smith v. Purnell, 475 F. App'x 464, 465 (4th Cir. 2012) (per curiam).
(E.D.Va. 2010) (“Chinese Drywall” remediation claim dismissed for failure to allege that insured was legally obligated to pay); 709 F. Supp. 2d 441 (E.D.Va. 2010) (amended complaint adequately pleads legal obligation); 793 F. Supp. 2d 785 (E.D. Va. 2011) (granting summary judgment to insurers where insured was not legally obligated to pay for remediation); dismissed on jurisdictional grounds, Builders Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dragas Mgmt. Corp., 497 F. App'x 313, 314 (4th Cir. Oct. 23, 2012).
th Cir. Dec. 9, 2009) (abuse of discretion not to hear insurer’s declaratory judgment action involving defense duties in a lawsuit arising out of the $600 million Blackberry settlement, where decision was limited to “eight corners” of the policy and the complaint); 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122836 (E.D. Va. Nov. 18, 2010) (on remand) (summary judgment granted to insurer declaring no duty to defend because business enterprise exclusion precluded coverage).
affirmed, Minn. Lawyers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Batzli, 442 F. App'x 40, 55 (4th Cir. 2011) (Shedd, J., dissenting).
Great American Ins. Co. v. Gross, 2005 WL 2009284 (E.D.Va. Aug 19,2005), rev’d, 468 F.3d 199 (4th Cir. 2006); on remand, 2007 WL 1577503 (E.D.Va. May 30, 2007); 2008 WL 376283 (Feb. 11, 2008) (rescission of directors & officer insurance policy)
reconsid. denied, 2004 WL 1080187 (E.D. Va. April 5, 2004); rev'd and remanded, 142 Fed. Appx. 147 (4th Cir. July 20, 2005) (insurance coverage, construction defect, subcontractor exception to “your work” exclusion)
5.0/5.0 Rated on 09/19/17 in Insurance.
Danny Howell has superbly handled many complex litigated insurance coverage matters for me over a number of years. Danny is whip-smart, aggressive and hard working. Danny is an affable, knowledgeable well connected attorney I trust to handle the most... Read more
Danny Howell has superbly handled many complex litigated insurance coverage matters for me over a number of years. Danny is whip-smart, aggressive and hard working. Danny is an affable, knowledgeable well connected attorney I trust to handle the most difficult of coverage matters, including complex DJs and related litigation. I highly recommend attorney Danny Howell! Read lessRead less
5.0/5.0 Rated on 09/19/17 in Litigation.
Danny Howell is a lawyer's lawyer. He represents the intersection of immense stock knowledge and the ability to craft the right arguments. And while thoughtful and professorial, Danny remains a zealous advocate.
You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.