Attorney Profile:

Mark C. Nanavati

Mark C. Nanavati: Attorney with Sinnott, Nuckols & Logan, P.C.

Biography

Pi Sigma Alpha. Member, Moot Court Board.

Areas of Practice (6)

  • Civil Litigation
  • Construction Law
  • Insurance Defense
  • Insurance Coverage
  • Products Liability
  • Professional Liability

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
804 893-3866  Phone
804 378-7600 x3316  Phone
804 378-2610  Fax
www.snllaw.com
University Attended:
University of Virginia, B.A., 1992
Law School Attended:
George Washington University, J.D., with honors, 1995
Year of First admission:
1995
Admission:
1995, Virginia; U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Court of Appeals 4th Circuit; U.S. District Court, Eastern and Western Districts of Virginia
Memberships:
Richmond and Virginia Bar Associations; Virginia State Bar (Member, Construction Law and Public Contracts Section); Chesterfield Bar Association; Virginia Association of Defense Attorneys; Defense Research Institute.
Reported Cases:
Federal
Unistaff, Inc. v. Koosharem Corp., 667 F. Supp. 2d 616; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93854, October 7, 2009.
Epes v. Green Tree Fin. Servicing Corp., 228 Fed. Appx. 275, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11946 (2007)
Structural Concrete Products, LLC v. Clarendon American Insurance Company, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61714 (2007)
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. J.A. Fielden Co., 440 F. Supp. 2d 523 (W.D. Va. 2006)
Dan Oliver, et al. v. K. Fowlkes, et al., 10 Fed. Appx. 236; 2001 U.S. App. Lexis 11872 (2001)
David Atkins, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Day, et al., 22 Fed. Appx. 182, 2001 U.S. App. Lexis 24874 (2001)
Derinda S. Person v. Physicians Health Plan, Inc., 20 F. Supp. 2d 918 (E.D.Va. 1998)

State
Riggins v. Andrews, 79 Va. Cir. 340 (2009)
Stephen Seals v. Erie Insurance Exchange, 277 Va. 558 (2009)

ISLN:
913010240

Peer Reviews

  • 4.8/5.0 28 reviews
  • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.8/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.6/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.9/5.0
  • Communication

    4.9/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.8/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 by a Associate on 07/25/12 in Personal Injury Defense

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 07/25/12 in Civil Liability

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Managing Partner on 07/25/12 in Personal Injury

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 07/10/12 in Construction Litigation

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 07/10/12 in Civil Litigation

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 07/10/12 in Construction Defects

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Managing Partner on 07/09/12 in Civil Liability

    I have known Mark since he started practicing and can attest that he is certainly an AV lawyer. We have litigated against each other, the last time being in a $1.75M sli... Read more

    I have known Mark since he started practicing and can attest that he is certainly an AV lawyer. We have litigated against each other, the last time being in a $1.75M slip and fall settlement that he defended and many times before that. He is one of the better defense lawyers in this area and has always demonstrated the highest ethical and professional standards in his practice, while zealously representing his clients.

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 07/09/12 in Construction Law

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Managing Partner on 07/09/12 in Litigation

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Member on 07/09/12 in Construction Litigation

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

See All 28 Reviews See All 28 Reviews »


*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

Disclaimer

Documents ({{amountArticles}})

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
Other documents: ,

Midlothian, Virginia

Contact Mark C. Nanavati

Please correct the fields highlighted in red.

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.


You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.