Charles H. Carpenter

Charles H. Carpenter: Attorney with Carpenter Law Firm plc

Biography

Associate, 1991-2000 and Partner, 2001-2009, Pepper Hamilton LLP. Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Water Rights Bureau 1983-1988.

Areas of Practice (3)

  • Federal Civil Practice
  • Administrative Litigation
  • Government Contracts Litigation

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
406-543-0511  Phone
www.carpenterlawplc.com
University Attended:
Montana State University, B.S., 1983
Law School Attended:
Columbus School of Law at Catholic University of America, J.D., 1991
Year of First admission:
1991
Admission:
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth and District of Columbia Circuits; U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois; U.S. District Court, District of Maryland; U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin; U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; U.S. District Court, District of Idaho; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana; U.S. District Court, District of Montana; U.S. District Court, Western District of New York; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas; U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin; U.S. District Court, District of Colorado; U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana; U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; U.S. Supreme Court; 1992, District of Columbia; 2007, Maryland; 1991, Montana; 2009, Idaho
Memberships:
The District of Columbia Bar; State Bar of Montana.
Birth Information:
Hartford, Connecticut, October 8, 1958
Reported Cases:
H&R Block Tax Servs. LLC v. Kutzman, 681 F. Supp.2d 1248 (D. Mont), aff'd, 373 Fed. Appx. 797 (9th Cir. 2010); Polartec LLC v. 180s LLC, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 28918 (D. Md. 2009); Gherebi v. Bush, 609 F. Supp.2d 43 (D.D.C. 2009); Conrail v. Ritter, 593 F. Supp.2d 107 (D.D.C. 2009); Jacobsen v. Oliver, 201 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2002), 451 F. Supp.2d 181 (D.D.C. 2006), 555 F. Supp. 2d 72 (D.D.C. 2008), appeal dismissed, No. 08-7060 (D.C. Cir. October 22, 2008); Titan International v. Compania Administradora, 533 F.3d 555 (7th Cir. 2008); Abdullah v. Bush, 534 F. Supp.2d 22 (D.D.C. 2008); Public Citizen, Inc. v. NHTSA, 489 F.3d 1279 (D.C. Cir. 2007); Falesteny v. Gates, 2007 U.S. App. Lexis 21740 (D.C. Cir. 2007); Christian Relief Services v. Walton, 943 So. 2d 869 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006); Leighton v. CIA, 412 F. Supp.2d 30 (D.D.C. 2006); City Chemical LLC, B-296135.2, B-296230.2, 2005 C.P.D. 120; Knoll, Inc., Steelcase, Inc., B-294986.3, B-294986.4, 2005 C.P.D. 63; Chongasing v. Virgin Islands Housing Authority, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 16813 (D.V.I. 2004); AmerisourceBergan Drug Corp. v. United States, 60 Fed. Cl. 30 (2004); Smart, Inc. v. Virgin Islands Housing Authority, 320 F. Supp. 2d 332 (D.V.I. 2003); Warsco v. Household Bank F.S.B., 272 B.R. 246 (Bankr. N.D. Ind.), aff'd, No. 02-26 (N.D. Ind. 2002), aff'd, 334 F.3d 638 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1073 (2003); Furash v. McClave, 130 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2001); Signet Maritime Corp., B-288402 (GAO 2001); Fagg v. United States, 211 F.3d 1273 (9th Cir. 2000); ES-KO, Inc. v. United States, 44 Fed. Cl. 429 (1999); Georgetown University Hosp. v. Reliance Std. Ins. Co., 1999 U.S. App. Lexis 7803 (4th Cir. 1999); American Competitiveness Institute v. Calder, 80 F. Supp. 2d 461 (E.D. Pa. 1999); Abrahim-Youri v. United States, 36 Fed. Cl. 482 (1996), aff'd, 139 F.3d 1462 (Fed. Cir. 1997), cert. denied sub nom. Gurney v. United States, 524 U.S. 951 (1998); Abdullah Sayid Rajab Al-Rifal & Sons, W.L.L. v. McDonnell Douglas Foreign Sales Corp., 988 F. Supp. 1285 (E.D. Mo. 1997); SEC v. Parkersburg Wireless LLC, 991 F. Supp. 6 (D.D.C. 1997); Seattle Audubon Soc'y v. Lyons, 871 F. Supp. 1286 (W.D. Wash. 1996), aff'd, 80 F.3d 1401 (9th Cir. 1996); In re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos Lit., 78 F.3d 764 (2d Cir. 1996); Henderson v. Department of the Navy, 39 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1699 (Comm. Dept. 1996); Sheridan-Kalorama Historical Ass'n v. Christopher, 49 F.3d 750 (D.C. Cir. 1995); NFRC v. Espy, 846 F. Supp. 1009 (D.D.C. 1994).
ISLN:
901390927

Peer Reviews

  • 4.9/5.0 (14 reviews)
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.9/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.9/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.9/5.0
  • Communication

    4.9/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.9/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 07/06/10 in Litigation

    Charlie is a terrific lawyer.

    Charlie is a terrific lawyer. Read less

    Read less
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 06/28/10 in Habeas Corpus

    It has been my pleasure to work with Mr. Carpenter on the representation of detainees at Guantanamo. He has demonstrated the highest levels of professionalism and ability and I recommend Mr. Carpenter for the highest available ratings.

    It has been my pleasure to work with Mr. Carpenter on the representation of detainees at Guantanamo. He has demonstrated the highest levels of professionalism and ability and I recommend Mr. Carpenter for the highest available ratings. Read less

    Read less

See All 14 Reviews »


*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

This attorney does not have client reviews.
Disclaimer

Documents ({{amountArticles}})

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
Other documents: ,

Missoula, Montana

Contact Charles H. Carpenter

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.