Mr. Robert Fulton Clark

RC
  • Member at Clark & Deen, P.C. (4 Attorneys)
  • Mobile, AL 36652
  • Peer Reviews
    5.0/5.0
    Client Reviews
    < 50% Recommended (2)
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
  • Update this Profile

Areas of Practice (7)

  • Criminal Defense
  • Driving While Intoxicated
  • Misdemeanors
  • Felonies
  • Homicide
  • Drug Crimes
  • Juvenile Law

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of Alabama, B.A., 1967
Law School Attended:
University of Alabama, J.D., 1970
Year of First admission:
1970
Admission:
1970, Alabama, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit; 1978, U.S. Supreme Court; 1981, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
ISLN:
908359491

Peer Reviews

  • 5.0/5.0
  • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

  • 1.0/5.0 (2 reviews)
  • Communication

    1.0/5.0
  • Responsiveness

    1.0/5.0
  • Quality of Service

    1.0/5.0
  • Value for Money

    1.0/5.0
  • No Recommendations   1.0/5.0 Rated on 11/04/11 in Criminal Law.

    This is without a doubt one of the rudest individuals that I had ever had the bad forturn to have to rely on. He is very good at telling you things, like he is coming to see you, and conveniently forgets what he says. I paid good money for NOTHING.

    This is without a doubt one of the rudest individuals that I had ever had the bad forturn to have to rely on. He is very good at telling you things, like he is coming to see you, and conveniently forgets what he says. I paid good money for NOTHING. Read less

    Read less
  • No Recommendations   1.0/5.0 Rated on 07/26/11 in Criminal Law.

    Mr. Clark failed to communicate with his client properly. He did not provide assistance as he should have for the expensive cost. He actually was working with the prosecutors.

    Mr. Clark failed to communicate with his client properly. He did not provide assistance as he should have for the expensive cost. He actually was working with the prosecutors. Read less

    Read less
Disclaimer