David M. Schuller

DS
  • Member at Edelman & Edelman, P.C. (11 Attorneys)
  • 61 Broadway, Suite 2220, New York, NY 10006
    View David M. Schuller's office location
  • Peer Reviews
    4.4/5.0
    Client Reviews
    No Reviews
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]

Biography

Second Circuit Review Editor, Brooklyn Law Review, 1976-1977. Recipient, Corpus Juris Secundum Award, 1976. Co-Author: "Trial Handbook for New York Lawyers," 3rd Ed. 1996, and annual supplements, 1997-2007.

Areas of Practice (3)

  • Personal Injury
  • Construction Accidents
  • Traumatic Brain Injury

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
(917) 579-4772  Phone
www.edelmanpclaw.com
University Attended:
Baruch College of the City University of New York, B.B.A., 1970
Law School Attended:
Brooklyn Law School, J.D., magna cum laude, 1977
Year of First admission:
1978
Admission:
1978, New York
Memberships:
New York State Bar Association; New York State Trial Lawyers Association.
Birth Information:
Brooklyn, New York, 1948
Reported Cases:
Pescatore v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. , 97F.3d 1 (2d Cir. 1996); Ebert v. NYC Health & Hospitals Corp., 186 A.D. 2d 621 (2d Dept. 1992), modified, 82 N.Y.2d 863 (1993); subsequent appeal, 210 A.D. 2d 292 (2d Dept. 1994), mot. for lv. denied, 85 N.Y. 2d 806 (1995); Green v. City of New York, 308 A.D.2d 408 (1st Dept. 2003), mot. for lv. denied, 1 N.Y.3d 505 (2004); Estate of Zimmerman v. Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc., 34 A.D.3d 628 (2d Dept. 2006); Alexander v. City of New York, 21 A.D.2d 389 (2d Dept. 2005); Stringari v. Peerless Importers, Inc., 304 A.D.2d 413 (1st Dept. 2003); Campisi v. Epos Contracting Corp., 299 A.D.2d 4 (1st Dept. 2002); Salles v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, 250 A.D. 2d 548 (1st Dept.), mot. for lv.denied, 92 N.Y.2d 817 (1998). Moore v. City of New York, 29 A.D.3d 751 (2d Dept. 2006); Boulukos v. 213 P.A.S., L.L.C., 7 A.D. 3d 346 (1st Dept. 2004); Castro v. Cepero, 299 A.D.2d 237 (1st Dept. 2002); Giardino v. Beranbaum, 279 A.D.2d 282 (1st Dept. 2001); Avacato v. Mount Sinai Medical Center, 277 A.D.2d 32 (1st Dept. 2000); Tenuto v.Lederle Laboratories, 276 A.D.2d 550 (2d Dept. 2000); Mineroff v.Silber, 274 A.D.2d 379 (2d Dept. 2000); Hecht v. Bass Restaurant, Inc., 267 A.D.2d 279 (2d Dept. 1999); Almodovar v. City of New York, 267 A.D2d 10 (1st Dept. 1999); Pilewski v. Solymosy, 260 A.D.2d 286 (1st Dept. 1999); Dores v. New York Medical Group, P.C., 259 A.D.2d 297 (1st Dept. 1999); Lebron v. NYC Housing Authority, 257 A.D. 2d 541 (1st Dept. 1999); Bonano v. S.Z Realty Corp., 256 A.D.2d 268 (1st Dept. 1998); Fitzgerald v. NYC Transit Authority, 243 A.D.2d 606 (2d Dept. 1997); Blass v. Hong, 240 A.D.2d 187 (1st Dept. 1997); Linares v. Fairfield Views, Inc., 231 A.D.2d 418 (1st Dept. 1996); Blades v. Franklin General Hospital, 199 A.D.2d 232 (2d Dept. 1993); Malavenda v. New York Telephone Co., 188 A.D.2d 962 (3d Dept. 1992); Wengrover v. Glass, 167 A.D.2d 985 (4th Dept. 1990); Moore v. NYC Transit Authority, 161 A.D.2d 505 (1st Dept. 1990); Spano v. City of New York, 144 A.D.2d 355 (2d Dept. 1988); Klein v. Mount Sinai Hospital, 121 A.D.2d 164 (1st Dept. 1986); Pigno v. Bunim, 114 A.D.2d 405 (2d Dept. 1985); Kingsley v. Redevco Corp., 97 A.D.2d 364 (1st Dept. 1983), affirmed, 61 N.Y. 2d 714 (1984).
ISLN:
903932361

Peer Reviews

  • 4.4/5.0
  • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

This attorney does not have client reviews.
Disclaimer

New York, New York

Contact David M. Schuller

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.