James W. Walker

James W. Walker: Attorney with Vandeventer Black LLP

Biography

Jim is an AV rated trial lawyer who has tried more than 200 cases to verdict in the federal and state courts in Virginia and the District of Columbia. Jim focuses on complex civil litigation, including defense of professional malpractice lawsuits against design professionals, accountants and lawyers, construction defects, business and contract disputes, product liability, toxic torts, and catastrophic injury and wrongful death matters.

Jim’s broad range of trial experience, often defending complex, high stakes litigation, allows him to assess risk and cost early, advise the client confidently in the early stages of litigation, and prosecute the case to successful resolution efficiently.

Jim has been recognized by The Best Lawyers In America in the fields of Commercial Litigation and Litigation - Construction since 2012; and has been selected for Virginia Business’ “Legal Elite” in the area of Civil Litigation since 2009. He teaches Trial Advocacy at T.C. Williams School of Law, University of Richmond, and is a frequent lecturer on trial tactics, civil litigation and professional liability.

Representative Engagements:
•Dawson v. Clark Nexsen, et al. (Fairfax) - Defense of lawsuit against engineer and engineering firm who designed a mid-block crosswalk in which the plaintiff was struck and severely injured. Settled in mediation
•Blake v. Securitas - (District of Columbia) Defense of security company in lawsuit involving severe injuries where plaintiff fell three stories on premises guarded by the defendant. Summary Judgment
•Bosworth v. Securitas - (Fairfax) Defense of lawsuit against security firm who provided guarding services at Mall where plaintiff was abducted and later killed.
•Cuba Libre DC, LLC v. Cuhaci and Peterson Architects - (District of Columbia) Defense of lawsuit against architect for errors and omissions in design services for tenant improvements. Settled in mediation
•Landow Builders v. Bascon, Inc., et al - (Loudoun) Defense of lawsuit against architect/construction manager for errors and omission leading to collapse of Dulles Jet Center roof in a major snowstorm. Settled
•Moses, et al. v. Architecture, Inc., et al. - (Fairfax) Defense of lawsuits against Architect and others for personal injuries due to exposure to mold in a school where renovations and expansion had been design by the Architect. Settled in mediation.
•Jones v. Skanska USA Civil Southeast - (Alexandria) Defense of lawsuit against highway construction contractor where plaintiff motorist was injured when a construction sign blew into his during a high wind event. Settled.
•Williamsburg Vineyards, LLC v. Dixon Hughes Goodman - (Norfolk) Defense of accounting firm in lawsuit by client arising out of tax and indemnity implications stemming from a series of conservation easement transactions. Settled in mediation
•Hughes v. Freightliner Corp. - (Roanoke) Defense of products liability claim against tractor-trailer manufacturer following crash allegedly due to a fault suspension part. Settled port verdict in judicial settlement conference
•Faracca v. Bel-Star, Inc., et al. - (New Kent) Defense of highway construction inspection firm in lawsuit brought by motorcyclist severely injured in a construction zone. Settled in mediation
•Gannon, et al. v. Millennium Partners, et al. - (District of Columbia) Defense of a series of personal injury and property damage lawsuits brought against developer of condominium project for problems with mold. Settled in judicial settlement conference
•Doeman v. Howard University, et al. - (District of Columbia) Defense of campus police force in lawsuit brought by student raped on campus. Settled
•City of Portsmouth v. Buro Happold, et al. - (Portsmouth) Defense of architect in lawsuit brought by City for damage to amphitheater during Hurricane Isabel. Settled.
•Renze, et al. v. Valley Industries, et al. - (Virginia Beach) Defense of trailer hitch manufacturer in product liability/multiple wrongful death lawsuit where trailer detached, struck plaintiff’s car, puncture the gas tank, and caused the car to catch fire. Settled
•Slade v. Collawn, et al. (Supreme Court of Virginia) Prepare Brief in Opposition to Petition for Appeal in case involving “use” of a vehicle for purposes on uninsured motorist coverage. Appeal denied
•East v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. - (Maryland) Defense of product liability lawsuit against makers of Drano where plaintiff alleged a serious eye injury. Settled
•Neuroth v. Toyotomi Company - (Richmond) Defense of kerosene heater manufacturer in products liability/wrongful death lawsuit where plaintiff died as a result severe burns. Defense Verdict
•Allied Signal Corp. v. Parks - (Richmond) Defense of former Allied Signal scientist in theft of trade secrets lawsuit. Defense verdict

NOTABLE ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Listed in Best Lawyers in America : Litigation - Construction (2012-17); Commercial Litigation (2015-17); Construction Law (2016-17)

Virginia Business, “Legal Elite”

News

•Vandeventer Black Attorneys Listed as ‘The Best Lawyers in America’ of 2019
•27 Vandeventer Black Attorneys Named ‘The Best Lawyers in America’ of 2018
•25 Vandeventer Black LLP Attorneys Named Best Lawyers In America 2017
•24 Vandeventer Black LLP Attorneys Included in the Best Lawyers in America 2016
•17 Vandeventer Black LLP Attorneys Selected as 2014 Legal Elite
•Vandeventer Black LLP Announces 23 Lawyers in the Firm to be Included in the 2015 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America
•The Best Lawyers in America 2014 Lists 23 Vandeventer Black Attorneys
•The Best Lawyers in America 2013 Lists 23 Vandeventer Black Attorneys

articles

•Expert Witnesses in Virginia
•No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: The Risk of “Helping Out” an Owner
•Punching Out...
•Sunset in Repose
•Just Sign Here

(Resident Partner, Richmond Office)

Areas of Practice (8)

  • Accounting Malpractice
  • Appellate Practice
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Construction
  • Construction Defect
  • General Litigation
  • Government Investigations & Enforcement
  • Professional Liability Defense

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
804.237.8807  Phone
804.237.8801  Fax
www.vanblk.com
University Attended:
University of Virginia, B.A.
Law School Attended:
University of Richmond T.C. Williams School of Law, J.D., cum laude
Year of First admission:
1988
Admission:
Virginia; District of Columbia; U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit; U.S District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia; U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia; U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Memberships:

PROFESSIONAL & COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
•Virginia Bar Association
•Virginia State Bar
•Virginia Association of Defense Attorneys
•Defense Research Institute - Professional Liability Committee
•Professional Liability Defense Foundation
•District of Columbia Bar Association
•American Bar Association
•Claims & Liability Management Alliance
•David Brian Bullock Scholarship Trust, Counsel

Birth Information:
Richmond, Virginia, May 14, 1961
Reported Cases:
REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS: Reported cases:; Bosworth v. Vornado Realty L.P., 83 Va. Cir. 549, 2010 WL 8925838 (Fairfax Circuit Court, 2011; Blake v. Securitas Sec. Services, Inc., 2013 WL 4505286 (D.D.C. 2013); Blake v. Securitas Sec. Services, Inc., 292 F.R.D. 15 (D.D.C. 2013); Goodman & Company v. Costa Brava Partnership, record No. 081710 (decided per curiam in the Supreme Court of Virginia, 2009); City of Portsmouth v. Cederquist Rodriguez Ripley, P.C., 72 Va. Cir. 405, 2007 WL 6002101 (Portsmouth Cir. Ct., 2007); Hughes v. Freightliner, LLC, 2006 WL 1842997 (W.D. Va., 2006); City of Portsmouth v. Buro Happold Consulting Engineers P.C., 69 Va. Cir. 397, 2005 WL 4001133 (Portsmouth Cir. Ct., 2005); Speier v. Renaissance at Victoria Farms, L.L.C., 2002 WL 31188559 (Fairfax Cir. Ct., 2002); Jordan v. Sandwell, Inc., 189 F.Supp.2d 406 (W.D. Va., 2002); Speier v. Renaissance at Victoria Farms, LLC, 58 Va. Cir. 90, 2001 WL 1830005 (Fairfax Cir. Ct.,2001); Stone v. Door-Man Mfg. Co., 260 Va. 406, 537 S.E.2d 305 (Va., 2000); Sentry Ins v. U.S. Fidelity and Guar. Co., 51 Va. Cir. 418, 2000 WL 288467, Richmond City Cir. Ct., 2000); Greene v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware, 74 F. Supp. 2d 616 (E.D. Va. Nov. 1999); Scarbrow v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 256 Va. 357, 504 S.E.2d 860 (1998); Booth v. Leaf, 40 F.3d 1243 (Table) (4th Cir. 1994); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Cuffee, 444 S.E.2d 720 (Va.1994); Taylor v. Atlas Safety Equip. Co., Inc., 808 F. Supp. 1246 (E.D. Va. October 15, 1992), aff'd 993 F.2d 229, 1993 WL 147473 (4th Cir. 1993); Bigger v. Doe, 960 F.2d 145 (4th Cir. April 23, 1992); Representative Engagements; Dawson v. Clark Nexsen, et al. (Fairfax) - Defense of lawsuit against engineer and engineering firm who designed a mid-block crosswalk in which the plaintiff was struck and severely injured. Settled in mediation; Blake v. Securitas - (District of Columbia) Defense of security company in lawsuit involving severe injuries where plaintiff fell three stories on premises guarded by the defendant. Summary Judgment; Bosworth v. Securitas - (Fairfax) Defense of lawsuit against security firm who provided guarding services at Mall where plaintiff was abducted and later killed.; Cuba Libre DC, LLC v. Cuhaci and Peterson Architects - (District of Columbia) Defense of lawsuit against architect for errors and omissions in design services for tenant improvements. Settled in mediation; Landow Builders v. Bascon, Inc., et al - (Loudoun) Defense of lawsuit against architect/construction manager for errors and omission leading to collapse of Dulles Jet Center roof in a major snowstorm. Settled; Moses, et al. v. Architecture, Inc., et al. - (Fairfax) Defense of lawsuits against Architect and others for personal injuries due to exposure to mold in a school where renovations and expansion had been design by the Architect. Settled in mediation.; Jones v. Skanska USA Civil Southeast - (Alexandria) Defense of lawsuit against highway construction contractor where plaintiff motorist was injured when a construction sign blew into his during a high wind event. Settled.; Williamsburg Vineyards, LLC v. Dixon Hughes Goodman - (Norfolk) Defense of accounting firm in lawsuit by client arising out of tax and indemnity implications stemming from a series of conservation easement transactions. Settled in mediation; Hughes v. Freightliner Corp. - (Roanoke) Defense of products liability claim against tractor-trailer manufacturer following crash allegedly due to a fault suspension part. Settled port verdict in judicial settlement conference; Faracca v. Bel-Star, Inc., et al. - (New Kent) Defense of highway construction inspection firm in lawsuit brought by motorcyclist severely injured in a construction zone. Settled in mediation; Gannon, et al. v. Millennium Partners, et al. - (District of Columbia) Defense of a series of personal injury and property damage lawsuits brought against developer of condominium project for problems with mold. Settled in judicial settlement conference; Doeman v. Howard University, et al. - (District of Columbia) Defense of campus police force in lawsuit brought by student raped on campus. Settled; City of Portsmouth v. Buro Happold, et al. - (Portsmouth) Defense of architect in lawsuit brought by City for damage to amphitheater during Hurricane Isabel. Settled.; Renze, et al. v. Valley Industries, et al. - (Virginia Beach) Defense of trailer hitch manufacturer in product liability/multiple wrongful death lawsuit where trailer detached, struck plaintiff's car, puncture the gas tank, and caused the car to catch fire. Settled; Slade v. Collawn, et al. (Supreme Court of Virginia) Prepare Brief in Opposition to Petition for Appeal in case involving use of a vehicle for purposes on uninsured motorist coverage. Appeal denied; East v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. - (Maryland) Defense of product liability lawsuit against makers of Drano where plaintiff alleged a serious eye injury. Settled; Neuroth v. Toyotomi Company - (Richmond) Defense of kerosene heater manufacturer in products liability/wrongful death lawsuit where plaintiff died as a result severe burns. Defense Verdict; Allied Signal Corp. v. Parks - (Richmond) Defense of former Allied Signal scientist in theft of trade secrets lawsuit. Defense verdict
ISLN:
903000770
Payment Information:
  • Credit cards accepted
  • Accepts Visa and MasterCard
  • Peer Reviews

    • 4.8/5.0 (34 reviews)
    • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.
    • Legal Knowledge

      4.9/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      4.9/5.0
    • Judgment

      4.8/5.0
    • Communication

      4.8/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      4.9/5.0
    • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 10/24/13 in Litigation

      I have known James W. Walker for at least ten years and know him to be a professional with the highest ethical standards and possessing excellent knowledge, skills and ability.

      I have known James W. Walker for at least ten years and know him to be a professional with the highest ethical standards and possessing excellent knowledge, skills and ability. Read less

      Read less
    • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 10/16/13 in Litigation

    See All 34 Reviews »


    *Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

    Client Reviews

    This attorney does not have client reviews.
    Disclaimer

    Documents (1)

    Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com

    Norfolk, Virginia

    Contact James W. Walker

    Required Fields

    Required Fields


    By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

    You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.