Stuart Carl Vess

SV
  • Member at Vess & Carpenter (2 Attorneys)
  • North Little Rock, AR 72114
  • Peer Reviews
    4.4/5.0 (1)
    Client Reviews
    < 50% Recommended (3)
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
  • Update this Profile

Areas of Practice (4)

  • Criminal
  • Social Security
  • Domestic
  • Traffic

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of Arkansas at Little Rock, B.S., 1969
Law School Attended:
University of Arkansas at Little Rock, J.D., 1973
Year of First admission:
1973
Admission:
1973, Arkansas
ISLN:
901820417

Peer Reviews

  • 4.4/5.0 (1 review)
  • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.4/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.4/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.4/5.0
  • Communication

    4.4/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.5/5.0

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

  • 1.0/5.0 (3 reviews)
  • Communication

    1.0/5.0
  • Responsiveness

    1.0/5.0
  • Quality of Service

    1.0/5.0
  • Value for Money

    1.0/5.0
  • No Recommendations   1.0/5.0 Rated on 12/26/14 in Criminal Law.

    Stewart Vess violated my sixth ammendment rights. He did not honestly represent me in a court of law I paid him his fees. At his judgment he suggested we take a judge trial. At the judge trail he did not call the witnesses we had brought to court in... Read more

    Read more

    Stewart Vess violated my sixth ammendment rights. He did not honestly represent me in a court of law I paid him his fees. At his judgment he suggested we take a judge trial. At the judge trail he did not call the witnesses we had brought to court in court who would have proven my innocence. He also informed me that he grew up with the judge and they socialize together. Mr Vess is nort an honest man much lee an honest lawer Read less

    Read less
  • No Recommendations   1.0/5.0 Rated on 03/14/13 in Criminal Law.

    i needed him to work for me and as long as i was giving him money he did.he did not advise me "what my best options were." nor did he argue my innocence in trial.subsequently i was sentenced to 15 yrs in prison under a law (70%) which meant... Read more

    Read more

    i needed him to work for me and as long as i was giving him money he did.he did not advise me "what my best options were." nor did he argue my innocence in trial.subsequently i was sentenced to 15 yrs in prison under a law (70%) which meant i served 10 years of the sentence.now i have a crime on my record that i am not guilty of,so record keeps me from being able to obtain suitable income in the work force. Read less

    Read less
Disclaimer