Keith E. Smith

Keith E. Smith: Attorney with Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Shareholder at Greenberg Traurig, LLP (2024 Attorneys)
  • 2700 Two Commerce Square, 2700 Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103
    View Keith E. Smith's office location
  • Peer Reviews

    3.8/5.0 (2)
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
    • #540 in weekly profile views out of 18,045 Attorneys in Philadelphia, PA
    • #42,536 in weekly profile views out of 1,822,458 total attorneys Overall
Attorney Awards

Biography

Keith E. Smith is a trial lawyer and corporate advisor whose wide-ranging practice is focused on the defense of national class actions, products liability, environmental, toxic tort and complex commercial litigation. He has wide-ranging experience as a both an advisor and trial counsel for regional, national and international clients for matters including product defect liability, class action, warranty, anti-counterfeiting and brand integrity, fire, construction, sexual abuse, employee terminations, restrictive covenants, misappropriation of trade secrets, employee fraud and embezzlement, contract disputes, and general commercial litigation.

Keith has represented national and international manufacturers of chemicals compounds, plumbing products, commercial and industrial machinery, automobiles and component parts, food and food products, tobacco, consumer products, textiles, and alloy, carbon, and composite piping.

He has also represented manufacturers in the defense of numerous class actions involving allegations of product defect, warranty, mislabeling and consumer fraud; and multi-state energy resellers in TCPA and variable rate energy contract claims.

Concentrations

•Consumer class actions
•Consumer protection litigation
•Product defect litigation
•False advertising
•Unfair and deceptive trade practices
•Products liability and mass torts
•Complex commercial litigation
•Trials

Areas of Practice (6)

  • Class Action Litigation
  • Products Liability & Mass Torts
  • Environmental & Toxic Tort Litigation
  • Retail
  • Antitrust Litigation & Competition Regulation
  • Commercial Litigation

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
215.988.7843  Phone
215.851.8383  Fax
www.gtlaw.com
University Attended:
Villanova University, B.A., 1989
Law School Attended:
Villanova University School of Law, J.D., 1992; Member, Villanova Law Review
Year of First Admission:
1992
Admission:
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York; U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey; U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado; New York; Pennsylvania; New Jersey
Memberships:

Professional & Community Involvement

•Member, Philadelphia Bar Association
•Member, Pennsylvania Bar Association
•Member, New York Bar Association
•Member, American Bar Association
•Member, Federal Bar Association
•Defense Research Institute
•Class Action Specialized Litigation Group (Past Membership Chair)
•Member, Editorial Board
•President, Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law, Board of Advisors, 2016-2017

Reported Cases:
Experience: Class Action Litigation: National counsel for a manufacturer of aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) in defending class action and individual cases across the United States alleging groundwater contamination by the U.S. Military and others using AFFF to train and to fight Class B fires.; Class action counsel for a manufacturer of professional hair care products, in defense of putative nationwide class action claims brought under state consumer protection laws challenging the labeling of the company's sulfate-free products.; Class action trial counsel for insurance company in defending litigation alleging, on behalf of a class of medical providers, a failure to pay millions of dollars in interest on hundreds of thousands of bills submitted under state statutes and not paid within 30 days of submission. Obtained dismissal on the merits of common law claims for conversion, unjust enrichment, and accounting. The class was decertified at the conclusion of trial.; Class action trial counsel for the U.S. subsidiary of an international automobile manufacturer against allegations of breach of express warranties, implied warranties and violations of the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act in which the defense verdict returned as to the implied warranty of merchantability claim and remaining verdict returned represented a small fraction of the amount claimed on behalf of the class and in line with the terms of previously agreed upon multi-state and national settlements reached after the start of trial.; Class action counsel for a plumbing supply line manufacturer in defense of putative nationwide class actions alleging warranty, tort, and consumer protection claims involving certain braided stainless steel water heater supply lines. Secured a negotiated settlement that was largely funded by insurance.; Class action counsel for an energy provider in defense of putative class actions filed in Federal courts in New York, Connecticut and Pennsylvania alleging contract and consumer protection claims arising from variable rate residential electricity supply contracts. Obtained a dismissal of Pennsylvania Action, which was affirmed by the Third Circuit. The New York case saw the dismissal of plaintiffs from half of the states; before the company reached a favorable multi-state settlement of the Connecticut action.; Class action counsel for electricity suppliers in defense of TCPA litigation surrounding marketing programs.; Class action counsel for a multi-family residential property management company in defense of class action claims for violations of the New Jersey Security Deposit Act. Secured the dismissal of all claims.; Part of a team representing a rental car company in defense of putative nationwide class action challenging the company's handling of damage claims to rental vehicles when the customer declines LDW coverage, including a claim under the FDCPA. The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Court denied class certification.; Representing international bank in wage and hour overtime pay class actions under state minimum wage laws and collective action under Federal Fair Labor Standards Act alleging that certain salaried employees have been misclassified as exempt and therefore not entitled to overtime pay.; Representing regional multi-state supermarket chain in wage and hour class action litigation under the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act and New Jersey Wage and Hour Law and collective action under Federal Fair Labor Standards Act claims alleging that supermarket chain is a joint employer under such state and federal overtime statutes with contracted vendor of cleaning services.; Class action counsel representing an international snack food manufacturer and distributor against claims that independent delivery operators working under a Distributor Agreement are in fact franchisees entitled to various protections and prohibitions on termination found in state franchise practices acts.; Class action counsel for distributor of musical instruments, in numerous class actions and multi-district litigation pending in the Southern District of California alleging antitrust violations and price manipulation in a hub and spoke conspiracy through the use of suggested minimum advertised pricing policies. Twice obtained the dismissal of the Federal antitrust claims. In August 2015, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the Federal claims. In re Musical Instruments & Equip. Antitrust Litig ., 798 F.3d 1186 (9th 2015).; Represented as national counsel an international manufacturer of water heaters in successfully defeating numerous national and state class actions (seeking damages in excess of $1 billion) in which class certification was overturned by the Texas Court of Appeals.; Represented Japanese automobile manufacturer in nationwide class action alleging property damage resulting from vehicle accidents allegedly connected to recall of vehicle, in which the nationwide settlement of class action was negotiated prior to class certification hearing.; Defended a putative national class action against an American subsidiary of a foreign manufacturer of microwave ovens on behalf of a class of over two million purchasers alleging a defective part created an increased risk of fire, in which the case was dismissed with prejudice prior to class certification.; Product Liability and Commercial Litigation: National Counsel for National Foam, Inc., a manufacturer of aqueous film forming foam (AFFF), in PFAS multidistrict litigation defending class action, municipal and individual cases filed across the United States alleging PFOS/PFOA contamination by the U.S. Military and others using AFFF. In Re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation , MDL No. 2873.; Representation of the air operations division of a prominent university in aircraft and airport issues, FAA regulatory matters, tax and aircraft purchases.; Lead trial counsel to one of the world's quality-leading manufacturers of small household appliances in a fire property damage case alleging defects in a toaster and damages in excess of $500,000 in a fast-tracked case that was tried within ten months of filing the complaint, obtained a defense verdict of no defect.; Trial counsel for apparel manufacturers and the leading national manufacturer of tuxedos for the rental market against a German component supplier in cases arising from claims of defective fusible interlining leading to delamination and buckling of coat fronts in which he obtained successful settlements for several clients and a seven-figure verdict in New York County Supreme Court after a six-week jury trial.; Trial counsel for a Taiwanese biotech company in breach of contract cases surrounding clinical trials of its HIV biologic.; Representation of a German automobile and motorcycle manufacturer in personal injury and property damage product liability cases, including crashworthiness and idle fire cases.; Successfully represented plaintiff in a sexual abuse case against a prestigious private boarding school in Princeton, New Jersey resulting in the New Jersey Supreme Court overturning over 40 years of charitable immunity law. Hardwicke v. The American Boychoir School , 188 N.J. 69 (2006).; Represented financial services company and related individuals in various litigation matters arising out of premium finance transactions.; Representing a group of investors in securities litigation arising out of misrepresentations made to investors and conversion of investors' funds in violation of investor agreements.; Representing developers, general contractors and subcontractors in breach of contract disputes arising from completed and suspended construction projects.; Represented national bank in various litigation matters involving enforcement of loan rights, fraud, conversion and conspiracy claims.; Represented numerous automotive component part manufacturers in product liability litigation including manufacturers of commercial brake systems, airbags, seat belts and semiconductors used in the automotive industry.; Represented individual investor in claims alleging violations of RICO, fraud and civil conspiracy.; National representation of a supplier of alloy and carbon pipe fittings to the energy industry as plaintiff and defendant in cases alleging specification deficiencies involving inadequate heat treatment, product deformity, improper composite material and other alleged metallurgical deficiencies.; Represented a food product distributor against claims of breach of warranty and fraud alleging that one of its products was infested with beetles when delivered to its customer.; Represented a cigarette manufacturer in trademark and brand integrity litigation involving the sale of counterfeit cigarettes and obtained numerous temporary restraining orders, ex parte seizure orders and dozens of permanent injunctions against infringers for trademark violations.; Represented a successful candidate's campaign for the United States Congress in areas of federal regulations in advertising, challenging false advertising, ballot challenges and overseeing vote canvas and certification.; Represented an international automobile component part manufacturer in flex-fan cases across Mid-Atlantic and Northeast region.; Represented one of the nation's leading technical and engineering recruiting and staffing agencies against a former placement manager for violation of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements and obtained a temporary restraining order against the former employee and ultimate dismissal of the former employee from the competing firm.; Represented a national leader in the distribution of specialized alloy fittings for the energy industry in a dispute against the former president of an acquired corporation for subsequent violation of non-compete and non-solicitation provisions of post-acquisition consulting agreement.; Represented one of the nation's largest suppliers and installers of home improvement products against a former executive employee who had sold several businesses to the client, and negotiated a seven figure buy-out by the executive of his non-compete obligations, after litigation in federal and state courts and before the AAA.; The above representations were handled by Mr. Smith prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
ISLN:
901052092

Peer Reviews

3.8/5.0 (2 reviews)
Peer Reviewed
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.0/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.0/5.0
  • Judgment

    3.5/5.0
  • Communication

    3.5/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.0/5.0

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Contact Keith E. Smith

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.