Seth J. Schwartz

Seth J. Schwartz: Attorney with Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.
  • Shareholder at Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C. (510 Attorneys)
  • 2000 Market Street, Suite 2300, Philadelphia, PA 19103
    View Seth J. Schwartz's office location
  • Seth J. Schwartz is a shareholder with Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin in the firm's Casualty Department. He provides legal counsel to commercial property owners/commercial property managers, amusement parks and recreational facilities, and insurance companies in Pennsylvania.
  • 5.0/5.0
    No Reviews


A shareholder with the highest rating, AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell in the firm's Casualty Department, Seth provides legal counsel to commercial property owners/commercial property managers, amusement parks and recreational facilities and insurance companies in Pennsylvania. He handles a wide array of serious loss cases where there is often catastrophic injury or death in the areas of premises liability, construction accidents, construction defects, sports, amusement and entertainment litigation. As an experienced trial attorney, Seth has tried numerous casualty cases to a jury verdict.

Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey, Seth was a staff trial attorney for seven years at Nationwide Insurance. He handled general defense litigation including automobile liability, construction matters, and premises liability. Before joining Nationwide Insurance, Seth entered private practice at a small civil litigation firm in Philadelphia, where he handled a range of civil litigation from premises liability to complex product liability matters.

Seth was appointed to judge pro tem for the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas and to the Investigative Division of the Philadelphia Bar Association's Commission on Judicial Selection and Retention.

Seth graduated from Temple University School of Law in 1992. He attended college at The American University where he graduated in 1988 with honors.

Classes/Seminars Taught

An Overview of Construction Defect Litigation in Pennsylvania, Nationwide Insurance Company, December 16, 2014

Commercial Defense Practice in New York, New Jersey & Pennsylvania, Nationwide Insurance Company, December 5, 2014

Commercial Defense Practice in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, Nationwide Insurance Company, December 2013

Brief Overview of Pennsylvania Contractual Indemnity and Additional Insured Issues, Nationwide insurance Company, April 2012

•Numerous presentations to property managers and insurance companies regarding effective claims handling and tender issues

•Pennsylvania Amusement Park Association Annual Conference, 2007

Honors & Awards

•AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell

Year Joined Organization


Areas of Practice (5)

  • Construction Accidents
  • Construction Defect Litigation
  • Premises Liability - Defense
  • Amusement
  • Sports and Entertainment

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
(215) 575-2720  Phone
(215) 575-0856  Fax
University Attended:
The American University, B.S., Finance, cum laude, 1988
Law School Attended:
Temple University School of Law, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, J.D., 1992
Year of First admission:
1992, Pennsylvania; 1994, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Associations & Memberships

• International Amusement & Leisure Defense Association

• Pennsylvania Amusement Park Association

• Pennsylvania Bar Association

Reported Cases:
Significant Representative Matters: Defense verdict in automobile rear-end collision with negligence stipulation involving surgery and significant wage loss claim. Negligence was admitted to the jury. Significant credibility issues developed during the case, including Plaintiff's vocational expert admitting in front of the jury of failing to produce all discoverable documents. After hearing the evidence, jury returned a defense verdict, although negligence was admitted; Defense verdict in rear-end motor vehicle accident case. Negligence was admitted. Plaintiff alleged surgery and a significant vocational claim. Numerous inconsistencies were developed during trial involving the Plaintiff's reporting of the incident to the doctor. After deliberation, jury awarded a defense verdict; Defense verdict in rear-end collision with negligence stipulation involving two personal injury claims of multiple herniations and permanency. During trial, evidence was developed which revealed that Plaintiffs provided varying medical histories to different doctors. After hearing the evidence, jury returned a defense verdict; Defense verdict in premises liability case whereby the plaintiff, a pizza delivery person, allegedly fell on ice while delivering a pizza. During trial Plaintiff admitted on cross examination to observing alternative pathways and that he did not maintain a vigilant look out. The jury returned a defense verdict in favor of the homeowners; Summary judgment on behalf of a national sports association. Plaintiff was playing in a league-sponsored game when he fell. Plaintiff sued claiming association was negligent. The court granted the Motion for Summary Judgment in light of certain technical provisions in the By-Laws, despite evidence of a negligent condition; Secured numerous tender acceptances in construction, amusement and sports industry matters.

Peer Reviews

  • 5.0/5.0
  • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

This attorney does not have client reviews.

Documents ({{amountArticles}})

Documents by this lawyer on
Other documents: ,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Contact Seth J. Schwartz

Please correct the fields highlighted in red.

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.