Phoenix, AZ:

Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, LLP

Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, LLP

Office Details

Office Size:
4
Year Established:
1993

Areas of Practice (10)

Specific Areas of Practice for our Phoenix office:

  • Exclusively Litigationlitigation
  • Securities
  • Antitrust
  • Consumer Fraud
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Environmental Law
  • Class
  • Derivative Actions
  • Federal Practice
  • Almost Always For Plaintiffs

Peer Reviews

  • 4.8/5.0 (72)
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.8/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.8/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.7/5.0
  • Communication

    4.8/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.7/5.0

See All 13 Reviews See All 13 Reviewed Attorneys »


*Attorneys who only have peer reviews prior to April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

  • 2.5/5.0 (2)
  • 1 recommendation
  • Communication

    2.5/5.0
  • Responsiveness

    2.5/5.0
  • Quality of Service

    2.5/5.0
  • Value for Money

    2.5/5.0
  • FIRST, SHE MET ME AT A HIGH RISE BUILDING ON N. CENTRAL (TO IMPRESS ME) LATER I FIND OUT SHE HAS A LITTLE OFFICE SOUTH OF MCDOWELL. AT FIRST I THOUGH...

    Read more

    FIRST, SHE MET ME AT A HIGH RISE BUILDING ON N. CENTRAL (TO IMPRESS ME) LATER I FIND OUT SHE HAS A LITTLE OFFICE SOUTH OF MCDOWELL. AT FIRST I THOUGHT SHE WAS REALLY SUCESSFUL AND HAD TWO OFFICES. HER NAME WAS NOT ON THE DOOR OF THE N. CENTRAL OFFICE AND HER CARDS WERE NOT AVAILABLE ON THE COUNTER WITH EVERYONE ELSES. SECOND, IN MY DEALINGS WITH AMY I FOUND HER TO BE UNTRUSTWORTHY FOR AT LEAST 5 REASONS. TO DETAIL ALL OF THEM WOULD BE TOO LENGTHY. TO NAME JUST ONE, I FOUND THAT 100% HER AVVO PROFESSIONAL RECOMENDATIONS FROM OTHER LAWYERS, SHE RETURNED THE FAVOR BY LEAVING A PROFESSIONAL RECOMMENDATIONT FOR THEM. THIRD, SHE DOES NOT RETURN PHONE CALLS. SHE WAS NEVER GOOD AT RETURNING CALLS BUT IN THE BEGINNING SHE WAS FAIR, LATER NOT SO MUCH. THAT WAS PARTIUARLY STRESSFUL BECAUSE WAITING
    1 TO 2 WEEKS FOR A CALL BACK FROM HER WAS WAY BELOW STANDARDS BY ANY STRETCH. AT SEVERAL POINTS I MADE A SURPRISE VISIT TO HER OFFICE; THIS IS HOW I FOUND OUT SHE WASN'T IN AN UPSCALE OFFICE. THEN (USUALLY) I HEARD FROM HER RIGHT AWAY. I HAVE TO RATE HER KNOWLEDGE AS VERY POOR TOO. SHE GAVE ME THE WRONG INFORMATION DURING MY INITIAL VISIT WITH HER ABOUT GETTING A SUPERSEDES BOND AND MANY PROBLEMS AROSE FROM THAT MISINFORMATION. SHE ALSO NEGLECTED TO TELL ME MY CHANCES OF WINNING AN APPEAL ARE ABOUT 20%. I FEEL THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN BROUGHT UP IN MY INITIAL VISIT WITH HER. SHE DID FINALLY TELL ME THE PERCENTAGES I WAS DEALING WITH, HOWEVER, SHE ONLY TOLD ME WHEN I PRESSURED HER IN A PHONE CALL. AS FAR AS AMY BEING KNOWLEDGABLE ABOUT APPEALS, I DON'T KNOW. ANOTHER LAWYER IS DOING MY APPEAL.

    • Communication

      1.0/5.0
    • Responsiveness

      1.0/5.0
    • Quality of Service

      1.0/5.0
    • Value for Money

      1.0/5.0
    Read less
  • Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, LLP

    4.0/5.0 on 08/17/10 on 08/17/10

    Read more

    • Communication

      4.0/5.0
    • Responsiveness

      4.0/5.0
    • Quality of Service

      4.0/5.0
    • Value for Money

      4.0/5.0
    Read less
Disclaimer