Keith E. Whitson

Keith E. Whitson: Attorney with Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP

Biography

Keith Whitson is a partner in the Litigation Services Department and is Managing Partner of the Firm’s Pittsburgh Office. He concentrates his practice in general commercial litigation, professional liability, product liability, appellate advocacy and mediation. He also has substantial experience in aviation litigation, insurance coverage and environmental law. A member of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Practice Group, he is an approved mediator and early neutral evaluator with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and serves in a variety of ADR roles, including settlement counsel.

Mr. Whitson represents corporations facing significant potential liabilities, including claims of environmental contamination, antitrust violations, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, product liability and breach of contract. He regularly represents design professionals in actions involving construction defects or professional liability claims. He also represents companies of all sizes in shareholder disputes, allegations of breach of fiduciary duties and disputes stemming from acquisitions.

Mr. Whitson also has substantial experience advising insurance companies with respect to insurance coverage questions and representing insurance companies in breach of contract, bad faith or declaratory judgment actions.

Clerkships

•Honorable Thomas A. Wallitsch, Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County

Other Distinctions

•Listed in The Best Lawyers in America for Commercial Litigation, 2018-2019 and Product Liability Litigation-Defendants, 2019
•Named a “Pennsylvania Super Lawyer,” 2017-2018 and a “Pennsylvania Rising Star,” 2005, by the publishers of Law & Politics and Super Lawyers
•Recognized in Who’s Who in Energy, 2014-17
•Sole recipient of the Client Choice Award for Product Liability in Pennsylvania (Client Choice Guide - USA & Canada), 2014
•Recipient of the Earl G. Harrison Pro Bono Award, 2012
•Named as a 2008 “Lawyer on The Fast Track” by The Legal Intelligencer and Pennsylvania Law Weekly
•Recipient of the Pennsylvania Bar Association Pro Bono Award, 2008

News & Publications

•Pro Bono Victory Protects Attorney-Client Communications for Incarcerated Individuals in PA
•Schnader Attorneys Named to The Best Lawyers in America 2019
•Many Schnader Lawyers Named to PA Super Lawyers
•Schnader Attorneys Named to Super Lawyers 2017
•40 Schnader Attorneys Named to The Best Lawyers in America 2018
•Keith Whitson Appointed Managing Partner of the Pittsburgh Office
•Schnader Receives Pennsylvania Youth Court Champion Award
•Pittsburgh Attorneys Lead Constitution and Youth Court Projects at Local Charter School
•Schnader Participates in Volunteer Day at Ronald McDonald House of Pittsburgh
•Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh Asking Supreme Court to Hear Case
•Third Circuit Weighs in on Application of Daubert at Class Certification Stage
•Schnader Attorneys Obtain Dismissal of Defamation Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania News Website
•“Takeaways From NY’s Dietary Supplement Investigation”
•Pennsylvania Raises the Bar: New Paradigm for Strict Liability Claims
•PA Supreme Court Declines to Extend Multiple Trigger Theory to Property Damage Claims
•The New Product Liability Paradigm in Pennsylvania
•2014 William A. Schnader Print Media Award Winners Announced
•Supreme Court Holds That CERCLA Preemption Is Inapplicable to Statutes of Repose
•Keith Whitson Selected as the Exclusive Winner of the Client Choice Awards for Product Liability in Pennsylvania (Client Choice Guide - USA & Canada 2014)
•Keith Whitson Offers Comment Regarding PA Access to Justice Commission
•New York’s Highest Court Does Not Recognize Claims for Medical Monitoring - For Now: Using “Phobia” Claims as a Backdoor to “Medical Monitoring?”
•Keith Whitson Offers Comment Regarding ACBA Small Business Legal Assistance Program
•Clarifying Media Reports Regarding Maryland Law and Causation in Asbestos Exposure Cases - part 1
•Does Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. Bartlett Herald the Demise of the “Failure-To-Withdraw” Theory?
•Superior Court Affirms Dismissal of Paxil Birth Defect Case Lacking Proximate Causation
•Limited scope engagements useful in pro bono representation
•Does New York Law Contain a Heeding Presumption? It Depends Who You Ask
•Keith Whitson Quoted in Charitable Work Refugee Article
•Recent Trends in Asbestos Litigation
•Inside the Minds: Settling Products Liability Claims
•Pro Bono Newsletter Summer 2012
•Schnader Honors Keith Whitson with Earl G. Harrison Pro Bono Award
•Pennsylvania Supreme Court Decision Expands Scope of Frye Challenges
•Schnader to Partner with Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. to Support the 2012 Pittsburgh Marathon
•Pennsylvania District Court Finds Supreme Court Failed to Adopt Clear Personal Jurisdiction Standard Over Foreign Defendant
•A Team of Schnader Attorneys Achieve Appellate Victory for Client in In re SK Foods
•Keith Whitson Appears on “Our Region’s Business” to Discuss Pennsylvania’s Fair Share Act
•Pro Bono Newsletter Summer 2011
•Cloudy Skies Ahead: A Divided Supreme Court Provides Uncertain Course for Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Manufacturers
•Supreme Court Strengthens Preemption Defense for Manufacturers
•Schnader Mentioned in Law360 Article on Air France Suit
•Design Defect Claims Against Vaccine Manufacturers Are Preempted by Federal Law
•Superior Court Interprets Oil and Gas Lease in Favor of Landowners
•Manufacturers of Generic Pharmaceuticals Must Warn of Dangers Learned After Obtaining FDA Approval
•Jeffrey Letwin and H. Lee Schwartzberg to Co-Chair Schnader’s Business Services Department
•“BNA Insights: House, Senate Bills Attempt to Expand Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers”
•“‘Equalizing’ the Playing Field with Foreign Manufacturers”
•Whitson Quoted in Article Detailing the Case of a Scientist Seeking to Clear His Name
•Pro Bono Newsletter Fall 2009
•“New Reporting Requirements Under MMSEA”
•New Mandatory Reporting Requirements Affect Companies Who Pay Money to Resolve Personal Injury Claims
•California’s Green Chemistry Initiative Promises Many Changes for Manufacturers and Distributors of Products Sold in California
•Two Schnader Attorneys Named 2008 “Lawyers on the Fast Track”
•Two Schnader Attorneys Are Honored With a 2008 Pennsylvania Bar Association Pro Bono Award
•Miller, Whitson at Forefront of Changing Product Safety Landscape
•Pro Bono Newsletter
•Five Schnader Attorneys Honored as Pennsylvania Rising Stars
•Whitson Quoted on Pittsburgh-Area Veterans Dispute
•Litigation Alert - Joint and Several Liability in Pa.
•Keith Whitson Quoted on Asbestos Trust Funds
•Pro Bono Newsletter

Community & Pro Bono

•Mr. Whitson’s community and pro bono focus is on diversity and inclusion and protecting rights of recent immigrants. He was part of the Allegheny County Bar Association’s Gender Equality Task Force and currently serves on the Gender Equality Committee. He also serves on the Firm’s Diversity Committee and is very active on the Pittsburgh Legal Diversity & Inclusion Coalition. He is a member of the Board of Directors of the Women and Girls Foundation.
•Mr. Whitson has assisted dozens of individuals in obtaining asylum or other protected status in the United States, either for themselves or their family members. He also has represented individuals facing deportation in the Immigration Courts and in the Courts of Appeals. He regularly works with the Pittsburgh Regional Immigration Assistance Center (PRIAC), part of Jewish Family & Children’s Service, and the University of Pittsburgh Immigration Law Clinic. He serves on the board of Legal Services to Immigrants and Internationals.

Related Events

•Asylum Law for Non-Immigration Lawyers
•Whitson Spoke on Advanced Issues in Civil Practice and Procedure
•Keith Whitson and Nancy Winkelman Participated in DRI Appellate Advocacy Seminar
•Schnader’s Whitson Moderated DRI Appellate Advocacy Committee Discussion
•Megan Harmon, Elliot Dater and Keith Whitson Presented M&A - Expanding Successor Liability Trends in Asset Sales CLE
•Keith Whitson Presented CLM Webinar
•Schnader Attorneys Gave CLE on Ethics
•Keith Whitson Presented at DRI’s 11th Appellate Advocacy Seminar
•Keith Whitson Presented “Early Resolution of Claims Using Settlement Counsel” for the Western PA Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel
•Keith Whitson Presents CLE Program “How to Properly Document A Settlement Agreement (After the New Joint and Several Liability Law)”
•Schnader’s Whitson and Winkelman Attend DRI’s 10th Annual Appellate Advocacy Seminar
•Keith Whitson Presented Appellate Practice Workshop at the Allegheny County Bar Association’s Bench-Bar Conference
•Schnader’s Keith Whitson Presented at CLE Seminar “Pennsylvania’s New Joint and Several Liability Law”
•Schnader’s Whitson Serves as Moderator at Allegheny County Bar Association CLE, “Preserving Issues At Trial and On Appeal”
•Taking and Defending Effective Depositions: Including a View From the Bench
•Navigating the Risks of Aerospace Product Liability

Areas of Practice (9)

  • Litigation Services
  • Product Liability
  • Appellate Practice
  • Aviation
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Creditors' Rights and Business Restructuring
  • Energy & Environmental
  • Higher Education
  • Insurance Services

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
University Attended:
Duke University, B.S., 1990
Law School Attended:
Washington University School of Law, J.D., 1993
Year of First Admission:
1993
Admission:
West Virginia; U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania; U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania; U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Ohio; U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Ohio; 1993, Pennsylvania; 1994, New York; 1996, Ohio; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio; U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia; U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
Memberships:

Professional Affiliations

•Allegheny County Bar Association, Appellate Practice Committee, Vice-Chair
•Allegheny County Bar Association, Gender Equality Committee
•Allegheny County Bar Association, Public Service Committee
•Allegheny County Bar Foundation, Board of Trustees
•Claims and Litigation Management Alliance
•Defense Research Institute, Appellate Advocacy Committee, Steering Committee
•Leadership Pittsburgh XXVI
•3rd Circuit Bar Association

Birth Information:
1968
Reported Cases:
Representative Matters: Commercial Litigation: Prosecuted claims for breach of contract on behalf of the owner of a landfill gas to electric facility against the EPC contractor.; In a CERCLA cost recovery action, obtained a judgment that response costs were divisible, thereby substantially reducing client's potential liability.; Represented an acquiring company in litigation against seller of the business for misrepresentations regarding the business' client base.; Defended a national company against allegations that its subsidiaries were the company's alter egos and obtained a judgment in the company's favor.; Defended a parent company against allegations that it was directly liable for contamination at a subsidiaries' facility, under U.S. v. Bestfoods .; Defended an engineering firm from allegations stemming from a landslide at a municipal solid waste landfill.; Defended a national cable service provider from a competing cable provider's claims for interference with contract, unfair competition and trespass.; Represented a printing press manufacturer in litigation arising out of a fire at a commercial printing operation that was believed to have originated in the printing press.; Prosecuted and defended breach of contract and breach of warranty claims on behalf of numerous clients including manufacturers of thermoplastic composites, medical devices and aircrafts; a real estate firm, a software licensing company, and a civil engineering firm.; Prosecuted and defended numerous claims of misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, covenants not to compete, and similar claims on behalf of numerous clients including a cardiac monitoring company, a developer of telemedicine products, a manufacturer of air freshening products, a manufacturer of boilers and heat recovery steam generators, and a manufacturer of water purification technology.; Prosecuted and defended numerous claims involving disputes among shareholders of corporations and members of limited liability companies, including entities involved in construction services, advertising services, and janitorial services.; Represented a major health care provider in antitrust litigation with a large healthcare insurer and a competing health care provider, whose claims ultimately were dismissed. Led a team of 15 attorneys in extensive discovery efforts including predictive coding, drafted and argued numerous motions, and participated in overall strategy decisions and settlement negotiations.; Represented an investor in a major film project in litigation with the film's producers over the credits and distributions due to the investor. Negotiated additional credits and distributions as part of a settlement of all claims.; Represented potentially responsible parties in CERCLA cost recovery and contribution actions, including a five-week allocation trial which resulted in an allocation of less than 1 percent to the client.; Represented the Trustee in the bankruptcy proceedings of a large food services company and affiliated entities, and successfully obtained an injunction preventing the president and owner of the bankrupt entities from dissipating assets.; Represented a national brokerage firm in a dispute as to whether an alleged beneficiary defrauded the client's customer into naming him beneficiary of her brokerage account. Secured a nominal settlement with the alleged beneficiary to preserve the customer's assets.; Replevied numerous assets, including airplanes, tractor trailers, a fire engine, an ice hockey rink, computer equipment, gasoline and printing presses, on behalf of various manufacturers and lenders; Prosecuted claims on behalf of a factoring company against account debtors for payment of receivables purchased. Obtained two non-jury verdicts against account debtors and recovered 100 percent of total amount owed to the client.; Professional Liability: Defended an engineering firm from allegations of professional negligence and breach of contract with respect to the design and construction management of a municipal solid waste landfill.; Represented an Am Law 100 law firm with respect to allegations of negligence in the creation of a series of trusts.; Defended an Am Law 100 law firm from claims asserting conspiracy, fraud and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.; Represented an engineering firm with respect to allegations of an employee's conflicts of interest.; Product Liability and Toxic Torts: Represented manufacturers of various aviation components in litigation surrounding aircraft accidents, including multidistrict litigation in which all claims against the client were dismissed.; Represented a manufacturer of printing presses in various product liability actions arising from employees who suffered injuries including de-gloving and amputation while working on those presses. Obtained favorable settlements or complete dismissals in each instance.; Represented a manufacturer of tungsten carbide in an action involving hard-metal disease in a customer's employee, and successfully negotiated an eight-party settlement.; Represented a manufacturer of flooring tiles where tiles in a high school building failed to adhere to the underlying concrete, and litigation ensued over the cause of the failure. Client contributed a nominal amount to an overall settlement between numerous parties.; Represented a manufacturer of corrugated boxes in an action alleging that defective boxes caused the destruction and spoliation of thousands of boxes of vegetables, and achieved a favorable settlement during trial.; Represented manufacturers of various products, including brakes, printing presses, pumps, electrical products, cranes, heat exchangers, mufflers and joint compound in asbestos litigation.; For one client, obtained dismissals or summary judgment in 570 individual cases without paying any amounts in settlements or judgments.; Represented various manufacturers in litigation over the source of fires that caused extensive property damage.; Insurance Coverage: Represented insurance carriers in litigation over the applicability of policies to underlying asbestos and other toxic tort litigation, and obtained favorable settlements on behalf of those clients.; Represented an insurance carrier in negotiations and litigation with an airport authority over claims arising out of the collapse of a runway.; Represented an insurance carrier with respect to claims arising out of the contamination of a major water supply in a metropolitan area.; Assisted an insurance carrier with revisions to its policy language in light of lessons learned from a mass disaster.; Prosecuted declaratory judgment actions and defended breach of contract and bad faith lawsuits on behalf of insurance carriers in multiple states.; Obtained rescission of an insurance policy based on fraudulent misrepresentations made in the insurance application.
ISLN:
900117792

Peer Reviews

Reviews Not Shown
This attorney has chosen not to display the review(s) provided by their peers.

Documents (7)

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Contact Keith E. Whitson

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.