Ms. Kim E. Pittman, Esq.

KP
  • Partner at Kim E. Pittman, Esq. (1 Attorney)
  • Portland, ME 04101-5035
  • Peer Reviews
    No Reviews
    Client Reviews
    < 50% Recommended (1)
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
  • Update your Profile

Areas of Practice (36)

  • Family Law
  • Alimony
  • Annulment
  • Cohabitation Agreements
  • Collaborative Family Law
  • Community Property Law
  • Divorce
  • Divorce Arbitration
  • Divorce Mediation
  • Domestic Partnerships
  • Domestic Relations
  • Domestic Torts
  • Domestic Violence
  • Equitable Distribution
  • Family Arbitration
  • Gay and Lesbian Family Law
  • Interstate Support
  • International Family Law
  • Marital Agreements
  • Marital Property Law
  • Marital Property Distribution
  • Marital Property Settlements
  • Matrimonial Law
  • Military Divorce
  • Name Changes
  • Non-Traditional Family Law
  • Palimony
  • Paternity
  • Post Divorce Modification
  • Postnuptial Agreements
  • Premarital Agreements
  • Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs)
  • Restraining Orders
  • Separation Agreements
  • Spousal Support
  • Uncontested Divorce

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of New Hampshire, B.A., 1988
Law School Attended:
University of Maine School of Law, J.D., 2005
Year of First admission:
2005
Admission:
2005, Maine
ISLN:
918968768

Peer Reviews

This lawyer does not have peer reviews.

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

  • 1.0/5.0 (1 review)
  • Communication

    1.0/5.0
  • Responsiveness

    1.0/5.0
  • Quality of Service

    1.0/5.0
  • Value for Money

    1.0/5.0
  • No Recommendations   1.0/5.0 Rated on 08/19/17 in Family Law.

    Kim Pittman was harsh and unsympathetic to the client. She showed up at court totally unprepared and unknowledgeable of the facts and ran from court room to court room simultaneously litigating at least 2 cases. In short she was a disaster.

    Kim Pittman was harsh and unsympathetic to the client. She showed up at court totally unprepared and unknowledgeable of the facts and ran from court room to court room simultaneously litigating at least 2 cases. In short she was a disaster. Read less

    Read less
Disclaimer