Attorney Profile:

Mr. Vann Allan Spray

VS

Areas of Practice (2)

  • General Practice
  • Personal Injury

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of Alabama, B.A., 1993
Law School Attended:
University of Alabama, J.D., 1996
Year of First admission:
1996
Admission:
1996, Alabama; 1997, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama; 1999, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit; 2000, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Alabama; 2002, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama
ISLN:
911880951

Peer Reviews

  • 4.4/5.0 16 reviews
  • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.3/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.4/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.4/5.0
  • Communication

    4.7/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.3/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 by a Managing Partner on 05/25/12 in General Practice

    Vann Spray is an excellent attorney and person. Read more

    Vann Spray is an excellent attorney and person.

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Member on 09/13/10 in Personal Injury

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Member on 09/13/10 in Civil Litigation

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 09/02/10 in Civil Practice

    Vann is an outstanding and hard working lawyer. Read more

    Vann is an outstanding and hard working lawyer.

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Marketing Partner on 09/02/10 in Civil Litigation

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 5.0/5.0 by a Partner on 09/02/10 in General Practice

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 4.8/5.0 by a Partner on 04/14/12 in General Practice

    • Legal Knowledge

      5.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      4.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 4.6/5.0 by a Partner on 09/23/10 in General Practice

    • Legal Knowledge

      4.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      5.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      4.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 4.4/5.0 by a Partner on 09/02/10 in Civil Litigation

    Very good, capable lawyer Read more

    Very good, capable lawyer

    • Legal Knowledge

      4.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      4.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      4.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 4.4/5.0 by a Partner on 09/02/10 in Defense Litigation

    • Legal Knowledge

      4.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      4.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      4.0/5.0
    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

See All 16 Reviews See All 16 Reviews »


*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

  • 5.0/5.0 1 review
  • 100% client recommended 1 recommendation
  • Communication

    5.0/5.0
  • Responsiveness

    5.0/5.0
  • Quality of Service

    5.0/5.0
  • Value for Money

    5.0/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 on 10/27/11

    Read more

    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Responsiveness

      5.0/5.0
    • Quality of Service

      5.0/5.0
    • Value for Money

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

Write a Review

Disclaimer