Anthony J. Dain

Anthony J. Dain: Attorney with Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP AV stamp icon
Attorney Awards

Biography

Professional Summary

Anthony J. Dain has represented clients in more than 100 jury trials, successfully representing international companies, financial institutions, federal agencies, tribal governments, public utilities, businesses and individuals. Anthony’s practice focuses on litigation in the areas of intellectual property, financial institutions, white-collar crime, environmental, commercial litigation and Native American issues, as well as alternative dispute resolution, mediation and arbitration. He has experience representing more than 100 matters before state and federal courts of appeal, and has 20 published appellate cases. Anthony is licensed to practice in all California Courts, Federal Courts, the Ninth and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Recognitions

•AmLaw Top Rated Lawyer in Intellectual Property Law, 2018
•Best Lawyers, 2017 (Appellate Practice), San Diego, CA
•Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent Rating
•The Best Lawyers in America 2016-2019 (Appellate Practice & Litigation - Patent)
San Diego Super Lawyers 2007-2019 (Intellectual Property Litigation)
•The State Bar of California Board Certified Appellate Specialist
•“Top Lawyers,” San Diego Magazine, Appellate Law - 2013
•“Top Lawyers,” San Diego Magazine, Land Use and Zoning - 2013
•“Top Lawyers,” San Diego Magazine, 2013 - 2018
•“Southern California Super Lawyers,” Super Lawyers Magazine, Southern California 2014

News Coverage

•Cullen, Anne. “Antitrust Deal ‘Breaches’ Must Be Arbitrated: Realtor Group,” Law360, January 23, 2019.

Seminars

In the past, Tony has served as a feature speaker for the San Diego County Bar Association, the American Corporate Counsel Association and the California Computer Expo.

(Also at Irvine Office)

Areas of Practice (6)

  • Asia-Pacific Cross-Border
  • Complex Commercial Litigation
  • Finance, Restructuring and Bankruptcy
  • Litigation, Intellectual Property
  • Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • White Collar Criminal Defense

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
619.515.3241  Phone
619.744.5441  Fax
www.procopio.com
University Attended:
University of California, San Diego, B.S., Biology, 1976
Law School Attended:
University of San Diego Law School, J.D., 1981
Year of First Admission:
1981
Admission:
registered to practice before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Federal District Court of Arizona; Ninth and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal; 1981, California; Supreme Court of the United States
Memberships:

Community

•California State Bar Association - Appellate Court Committee
•Salute to Teachers, 2017-2018

Reported Cases:
Representative Matters: Obtained patent infringement verdict of 13.5M, after a three week jury trial in the Central District of California, involving polyimide film used in the flexible printed circuit boards of mobile phones.; Obtained 2.2M verdict, after five day jury trial in the Central District of California, with findings of breach of fiduciary duty and conversion against the former CEO of a plastics recycling company.; Obtained high seven-figure patent infringement settlement on the eve of trial in Delaware District Court for the company of the inventor of a groundbreaking all-optical switch for data transmission.; Obtained mid seven figure verdict in first phase of multi-phase, consolidated trial, representing ambulatory surgical centers against several insurance coverers. After 17 day trial, and Defendants writ to the Court of Appeal the Appellate Court issued a published decision affirming the lower courts findings and judgment.; Obtained patent infringement verdict of 5.5M, plus 10% royalty on behalf of manufacturer of polymer fibers, against importer and distributor of infringing products. After a two week jury trial in the Northern District of Texas, the jury returned a verdict finding the patents infringed and valid and rejecting defendants' claims of unenforceability.; Obtained 2.9M judgment for distributor of automobile after-market products, after 4 week trial and appeal in trademark, false advertising and false patent marking case.; Obtained 1.73M toxic tort verdict after 5 week jury trial. Plaintiffs, owners of a family business, were exposed to pathogens in treated sewage water after defendants' water district and contractors misconnected an irrigation line to a tap water line.; Represented Federal Regulator in Director and Officer investigation of failed financial institution, negotiating settlement of 7.9M.; Defended ice delivery company in patent infringement preliminary injunction in Arizona District Court. In this bet the company evidentiary hearing, the trial court construed the claims and found the company's machine did not infringe the patent.; Obtained jury verdict on behalf of plaintiff in malicious prosecution lawsuit after two week trial in Malibu, CA.; Defended wireless telephone carrier in Eastern District of Virginia ( rocket docket ). Plaintiff was requesting 170M for alleged infringement of wireless modem adaptors. After three week jury trial, jury rendered verdict of non-infringement and invalidity of the patent.; Represented floor cleaning equipment manufacturer in defense of two week patent jury trial in Southern District of California. Patent claims currently rejected by USPTO following reexamination.; Obtained judgment of acquittal in jury trial on criminal charges brought against German exporter.; Obtained defense jury verdict on behalf of CPR Savers and First Aid Supplies in suit brought by Express Companies, Inc., alleging theft of trade secrets and interference with Express' contract with Yahoo.; Defended a tribal development corporation in jury trial in Atlanta, GA, involving allegations of breach of contract.; Obtained 1.38M jury verdict on behalf of the historic US Grant Hotel against its former operator; also obtained verdict for US Grant Hotel against the cross-complaint of operator seeking 5M for breach of contract.; Multi-million dollar recovery for receiver of failed financial institutions against officers and directors, as well as banker's bond and directors and officers insurance carriers, for wrongful acts committed in commercial and multi-family residential lending.; Defended vacuum equipment manufacturer in complex trade secret litigation in California Southern District Court. Case settled favorably on first day of trial, following successful rulings on in-limine motions.; Represented bank executives in criminal and civil case, obtaining published decisions in both California Court of Appeals and Supreme Court on novel state and federal constitutional issues.; Represented two energy utilities in Nox emission patent litigation in the Southern District of California obtaining damages and royalties in excess of 1M and a royalty free license to use more than 60 US and foreign patents.; Defended an institutional lender in CERCLA litigation using the Asset Conservation, Lender Liability and Deposit Insurance Protection Act.; Defended Jan San Company in patent infringement law suit brought by industry leader. Following successful invalidation of the patent, obtained confidential settlement in counterclaim for anti-trust violation.; Defended a public utility in solar energy patent litigation in the District Court of Arizona and the Central District of California - plaintiff claimed more than 2.5B in worldwide damages.; Represented a patent holder and its exclusive licensee in a jury trial in the Central District of California obtaining damages and a permanent injunction against the infringer - the infringer settled, post judgment, agreeing to pay several million dollars in past damages and future royalties.; Obtained a defense verdict for a biotech company in trade dress and unfair competition litigation in the Central District of California, involving the distribution of horizontal electrophoresis devices.; Obtained a multi-million dollar settlement for an internet company involving issues of trademark and copyright infringement.
ISLN:
908047367

Peer Reviews

5.0/5.0 (2 reviews)
A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.
  • Legal Knowledge

    5.0/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    5.0/5.0
  • Judgment

    5.0/5.0
  • Communication

    5.0/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    5.0/5.0

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

San Diego, California

Contact Anthony J. Dain

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.