Joseph & Cohen is a premier banking, financial services and litigation boutique emphasizing complex banking, regulatory, corporate, litigation, securities, employment and transactional matters for public and private businesses and investors
All partners and of counsel are members of the California State Bar. Jonathan D. Joseph is also a member of the New York State Bar and the D.C. Bar.
Areas of Practice (109)
Specific Areas of Practice for our San Francisco office:
Antitakeover and Defensive Tactics
Bank and Bank Holding Company Law
Boards of Directors and Fiduciary Duties
Corporate Finance and Securities
Debt and Equity Structuring
Executive Compensation and Compensation Committees
Federal Bank Regulatory and Enforcement Matters
Mergers and Acquisitions
Public Company and Sarbanes Oxley Compliance
Private Equity and Public Offerings
Risk and Litigation Management
Start-ups and Choice of Entity
Federal Civil Litigation
Covenants Not To Compete
Employment Breach of Contract
Executive Employment Law
Executive Severance Contracts
Management Employment Law
Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation
Wrongful Termination Defense
Complex and Multi-District Litigation
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Labor and Employment
Corporate Banking Law
Corporate Commercial Law
Corporate Control Contests
Corporate Fiduciary Law
Closely Held Corporations
International Corporate Finance
International Corporate Law
Financial Institution Regulation
Financial Institution Reorganization
Financial Institutions Law
Financial Institutions Litigation
Debt and Equity Finance
Cross Border Investment
Financial Services Law
Financial Services Regulation
Foreign Investment in the United States
Institutional Investment Law
International Venture Capital
Investment Banking Law
Mergers, Acquisitions and Divestitures
Credit Card Law
Interest and Usury
Truth in Lending
About Peer Rating
Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.
The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell's extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.
What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer's peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.
Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.
*Attorneys who only have peer reviews prior to April 15, 2008 are not displayed.
About Client Rating
The Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by clients of lawyers and law firms.
The Client Review Rating score is determined through aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending and who want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners and private individuals.
Martindale-Hubbell validates that the reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified within the past year, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses are entirely from client reviewers.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review.
No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Testimonials or endorsements in any review do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Past results are not a guarantee of any future results as each case must be decided on its own merits. Client Review Ratings and/or Peer Review Ratings may not be available for all firms and/or lawyers and the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable.