Mr. David Carlson Smith

DS
  • Attorney at David Carlson Smith, P.C. (1 Attorney)
  • Santa Fe, NM 87501-2055
  • Peer Reviews
    4.4/5.0
    Client Reviews
    100% Recommended (1)
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
  • Update your Profile

Areas of Practice (12)

  • Entertainment Law
  • Trust Law
  • Copyright and Trademark Law
  • Asset Protection
  • Creditors Rights
  • International Asset Protection
  • Bankruptcy/Debtor/Creditor/Consumer
  • Business/Corporations
  • Estate Planning/Taxation/Probate/Wills
  • Intellectual Property/Patent/Entertainment
  • Torts/Pers Injury/Prop Damage
  • Real property/Landlord-tenant

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
Yale University, B.A., 1964
Law School Attended:
Temple University, J.D., 1968
Year of First admission:
1968
Admission:
1989, U.S. District Court, District of New Mexico; 1968, Pennsylvania; 1985, New Mexico
ISLN:
903630847
Hobbies & interests:
Photography, Music Production, Scuba Diving, Travel.

Peer Reviews

  • 4.4/5.0
  • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

  • 5.0/5.0 (1 review)
  • 100% (1 recommendation)
  • Communication

    5.0/5.0
  • Responsiveness

    5.0/5.0
  • Quality of Service

    5.0/5.0
  • Value for Money

    5.0/5.0
  • Recommended 5.0/5.0 Rated on 12/02/10 in Consumer Law.

    He really "told it like it is" and did not appear to give an optimistic view even though we were "right." The facts were that we would probably not be successful in demanding our rights even though we had been told orally that we... Read more

    Read more

    He really "told it like it is" and did not appear to give an optimistic view even though we were "right." The facts were that we would probably not be successful in demanding our rights even though we had been told orally that we would be treated in a certain way and when "push came to shove" we were not. Read less

    Read less
Disclaimer