Jonathan B. Frank

Jonathan B. Frank: Attorney with Jonathan B. Frank Of Counsel to Maddin, Hauser Roth & Heller, P.C. AV stamp icon
Attorney Awards

Biography

Finalist, Campbell Moot Court Competition, University of Michigan Law School. Shareholder: Jonathan B. Frank, P.C., August 1999-February 2001; Mason Steinhardt, September 1989-August 1999. Associate: O'Melveny & Myers, January 1987-May 1989; Memel Jacobs, September 1985-December 1987. Member: Detroit Police Athletic League; Detroit Urban Debate League; Jewish News Foundation; Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit; American Jewish Committee; Jewish Family Service; Jewish Ensemble Theater; Stanford University Alumni; Bizdom U; University of Michigan Law School; University of Michigan Law School Alumni; The New Enterprise Forum Ann Arbor Michigan; Detroit Regional Chamber; Metro Detroit Small Business.

(Also Of Counsel to Jackier Gould, P.C.)

Areas of Practice (2)

  • Business and Real Estate Litigation
  • Dispute Resolution

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 215, Southfield, MI 48304
University Attended:
Stanford University, A.B., Political Science and Economics, with distinction, 1982
Law School Attended:
University of Michigan Law School, J.D., cum laude, 1985
Year of First Admission:
1985
Admission:
1985, California; 1989, Michigan
Memberships:
Oakland County (Member: Circuit Court Committee; ADR Committee) and American (Member, Litigation Section) Bar Associations; State Bar of Michigan.
Reported Cases:
Published opinions City of Flint v. Patel, 198 Mich. App. 153 (1993); Standard Federal Savings Bank v. Genesee County, 208 Mich. App. 569 (1995); Noel v. Fleet Finance, Inc., 971 F. Supp. 1102 (ED Mich. 1997); Great Lakes Steel v. City of Ecorse, 227 Mich. App. 366 (1998); Williams v. City of Troy, 269 Mich. App. 670 (2005); Unpublished opinions DaimlerChrysler Services v. Summit National, Inc., 2005 WL 1994321 (6th Cir. 2005); Phoenix Investment Holdings v. Nosan & Silverman Homes, Docket No. 126561 (Mich. 2005); Horvath v. Kempster, Docket No 264035 (Mich. App. 2006); Tres Galanes v. Cordoba, Docket No 282643 (Mich. App. 2009); Wagner v. Marroghi, Docket No 280632 (Mich. App. 2009).
ISLN:
907299590
Payment Information:
  • Credit cards accepted
  • Accepts Visa
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available

Peer Reviews

4.8/5.0 (35 reviews)
High ethical standing icon
A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.8/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.8/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.8/5.0
  • Communication

    4.8/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.9/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Of Counsel on 06/13/13 in Commercial Litigation

    I consider Jonathan Frank to be a fine lawyer, who possesses integrity and excellent work ethics. He is very bright, always prepared and has the best interests of his clients in mind at all times.

    I consider Jonathan Frank to be a fine lawyer, who possesses integrity and excellent work ethics. He is very bright, always prepared and has the best interests of his clients in mind at all times. Read less

    Read less
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 06/13/13 in Civil Litigation


*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Southfield, Michigan

Contact Jonathan B. Frank

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.