Robert J. Telfer, III

Robert J. Telfer, III: Attorney with Messer Caparello, P.A.


Public Service
- Law Clerk, Chief Judge Joseph W. Hatchett, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, 1998-1999

- Martindale-Hubbell Rating: AV® Preeminent ™
- Florida Super Lawyers, Rising Stars, 2009 and 2010

Community Activities
- Leadership Tallahassee, Class 23
- World Class Schools of Leon County, Board of Directors

Publications and Lectures
- “The Importance of Appellate Oral Argument”, 33 Stetson Law Review 139 (Fall 2003)

Areas of Practice (12)

  • Litigation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Civil Appeals
  • Complex and Multi-District Litigation
  • Civil Practice
  • Federal Civil Practice
  • Labor and Employment
  • Civil Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Constitutional
  • Election
  • Campaign and Political

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
850.222.0720  Phone
850.224.4359  Fax
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 15579, Tallahassee, FL 32308
University Attended:
Northwestern University, B.A., 1994
Law School Attended:
Stetson University College of Law, J.D., cum laude, 1997
Year of First admission:
U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit; U.S. District Court; U.S. District Court; 1997, Florida
- The Florida Bar, Appellate Practice Section
- The Florida Bar, Trial Lawyers Section
- Tallahassee Bar Association
- American Bar Association
- William H. Stafford Inn of Court
- The Florida Bar, Appellate Court Rules Committee (2008 — present)
- The Florida Bar, Federal Court Practice Committee, 2002 — 2007 (Vice Chair 2003 — 2005)
Birth Information:
Titusville, Florida, September 13, 1972
Reported Cases:
- Harrington, et al. v. Gutierrez, et al., No. SC01-1814 (Fla. April 19, 2002). Order granting All Writs Petition and directing circuit court judge to vacate his order prohibiting defense counsel who are employed as full-time insurance company staff counsel from using their individual firm names in pleadings and correspondence, or requiring insurance company staff counsel to disclosure their insurance company affiliation in filing pleadings or other papers in his Division.
- In re: Constitutionality of House Joint Resolution 1987, 817 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 2002). The Florida Supreme Court, in an original proceeding pursuant to Article III, Section 16(c) of the Florida Constitution, unanimously upheld the Florida House of Representatives' plan for reapportionment.
- Griffin v. Kia Motors Corp., 843 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). In the first appellate decision on the “crashworthiness doctrine” after the Florida Supreme Court's landmark decision inD'Amario v. Ford, 806 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2001), the First District reversed a jury's defense verdict. However, the court instructed, on remand, that evidence of the driver's conduct in causing the first accident could be introduced by Kia as a threshold decision.
- International Truck & Engine Corp. v. Capital Truck, Inc., 872 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). On petition to review a non-final order of an administrative agency, the First District quashed the challenged order of the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, as it failed to give effect to a Florida judgment and caused economic deprivation to the aggrieved parties.
- Curry v. Florida Bd. of Professional Engineers, 873 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (reversing order of the Board denying Appellant's request for formal hearing).
- Advisory Opinion to Governor re Sheriff and Judicial Vacancies Due to Resignations, 928 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. 2006). The Florida Supreme Court opined that a “vacancy in office” for a county sheriff shall be calculated from the date of the resignation letter.
- XL Specialty Ins. Co. v. Aircraft Holdings, LLC, 929 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). The First District granted the insurance company's petition for writ of certiorari, holding that the attorney-client privilege is not eliminated in first-party bad faith insurance lawsuits.
- Jennings v. Florida Elections Comm'n, 932 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). The Second District held that a statutory change to Section 106.25, Florida Statutes, should be applied retroactively, thus resulting in the dismissal of nearly 30 alleged violations against a city councilman.
- DiOrio v. Granger, 942 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (upholding trial court's entry of default).
- Floridians Against Expanded Gambling v. Floridians for a Level Playing Field, 945 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (en banc). The First District, en banc, reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in a pre-election challenge of a proposed constitutional amendment, in which it was alleged that petition signatures were procured by fraud, holding that the election could not have cured the alleged fraud as a matter of law.
- Wennett v. Abramson, 996 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (per curiam affirmed) (upholding trial court's final judgment in an election contest).
- Represents clients in appellate proceedings before the Supreme Court of Florida, all Florida District Courts of Appeal, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
- Represents public and private entities in complex litigation, including employment litigation, before the state and federal courts of Florida.
Payment Information:
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Peer Reviews

    Client Reviews

    This attorney does not have client reviews.

    Documents ({{amountArticles}})

    Documents by this lawyer on
    Other documents: ,

    Tallahassee, Florida

    Contact Robert J. Telfer, III

    Required Fields

    Required Fields

    By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

    You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.