- IRS Rules Remittance Basis Minimum Charge Paid by U.K. Nondomiciliaries Is Creditable Foreign Tax for U.S. Income Tax Purposes
- August 19, 2011 | Authors: Jane W. Meisel; Paul W. Oosterhuis; David Joseph Sotos
- Law Firms: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP - New York Office ; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP - Washington Office
On August 11, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Revenue Ruling 2011-19, which concludes that the remittance basis charge (RBC) applied to long-term nondomiciliaries of the U.K. — those resident in the U.K. for seven of the last nine years but who claim foreign domicile — meets the requirements of a creditable foreign income tax for U.S. income tax purposes. The conclusions reached in the IRS Ruling are consistent with the advice we provided to Her Majesty’s Treasury in March 2008 when the RBC provisions were initially announced. The IRS Ruling is important for U.S. citizens who are long-term resident nondomiciliaries of the United Kingdom, and employers of such persons, as it provides that U.S. citizens will generally not be subject to double taxation on unremitted non-U.K.-sourced income subject to the RBC.
In general, persons resident and domiciled in the U.K. are taxed on their worldwide income and capital gains as they arise — the so-called arising basis of taxation. Those persons who are resident but not domiciled within the U.K. may, alternatively, elect to be taxed pursuant to the remittance-basis tax regime. Under that regime, a nondomiciliary is not taxed on non-U.K. income that remains offshore for U.K. tax purposes, but is subject to U.K. tax only on income or gain remitted or deemed remitted to the U.K. and on U.K.-source income.
In 2008, the RBC was introduced as an amendment to the remittance-basis tax provisions, and requires long-term nondomiciliaries who elect to be taxed on the remittance basis to pay a £30,000 minimum charge to remain within the U.K. remittance-based tax regime. For purposes of the RBC, long-term nondomiciliaries are required to nominate an amount of income or gain that does not exceed an amount that, if subject to U.K. tax, would give rise to a U.K. tax equal to the £30,000 RBC amount. If a long-term nondomiciliary does not nominate a sufficient amount of income or gain, the RBC provisions deem an amount of income to have been nominated (“deemed nominated income”) that, along with the actually nominated income, would give rise to a U.K. tax equal to the £30,000 RBC amount.
In its ruling, the IRS determined that the RBC and remittance basis of taxation are a single tax, which is referred to as the long-term nondomiciliary (LTND) levy, and that the tax has the predominant character of an income tax. As a result of meeting these core requirements of the U.S. Treasury Regulations, the IRS Ruling concludes that the RBC paid as part of the remittance basis of U.K. taxation is a creditable foreign income tax for purposes of the U.S. foreign tax credit provisions. In its analysis of whether the LTND levy satisfies the predominant character test, the IRS Ruling considered the realization, gross receipts and net income requirements of the U.S. Treasury Regulations. In this regard, the IRS noted that, in limited cases, the realization requirement could be viewed as not met where a LTND did not have enough non-U.K. source income or gain to justify the £30,000 charge (e.g., the LTND had only £10,000 of unremitted non-U.K. source income), but still elected to be taxed on the remittance basis. The IRS recognized, however, that it was reasonable to assume that a LTND in such a case would not elect to be taxed on the remittance basis and pay the £30,000 RBC amount, but instead would choose to be taxed on the arising basis of taxation. Thus, the IRS concluded that, in most cases, the LTND levy is not based only or predominantly on amounts of income which a LTND has not actually earned. Based on meeting the above requirements, the IRS Ruling concludes that that the LTND tax is likely to reach net gain in the normal circumstances in which it applies and has the predominant character of an income tax in the U.S. sense.
Of particular note, the IRS Ruling cautions that, in certain circumstances, the remittance-basis tax (including the RBC) is not creditable for U.S. tax purposes if it is considered a noncompulsory payment of U.K. tax. The IRS Ruling states that in considering whether the remittance-basis tax (including the RBC) may be claimed as a credit, the payment of the U.K. tax must be considered in light of the elections and options an LTND could exercise in determining its U.K. tax liability, and such elections and options must be exercised in a manner that is considered to reduce, over time, the LTND’s liability for U.K. tax. In regard to the IRS caveat, there may be several situations where the remittance-basis tax (including the RBC) paid by an LTND may be considered noncompulsory, including the following two general circumstances.
1.Where a LTND elects to be taxed on the remittance basis but would pay less U.K. tax for the taxable year if the LTND had not made the election and instead had been taxed under the arising basis of taxation. As discussed above, this situation could occur where an LTND does not have enough non-U.K. source income to justify the £30,000 charge (e.g., the LTND has only £10,000 of unremitted non-U.K. source income). In such a case, the amount that the LTND could claim as a credit for U.S. tax purposes may be limited to an amount equal to the U.K. tax that the LTND would have paid if its income for the taxable year had been taxed under the arising basis of taxation.
2.Where a taxpayer actually nominates a small amount of income (e.g., £1) but subsequently remits income to the United Kingdom. Many individuals who do not anticipate remitting any of their non-U.K. income or gains actually typically nominate very small amounts. If, however, such an individual actually remits, either accidentally or otherwise, any of his or her nominated income or gains and not all of his or her previously unremitted income and gains, the individual must apply a statutorily prescribed regime for deciding which income or gains have been remitted to the U.K. for the relevant tax year (although it is currently proposed that a “safe harbor” be created in the amount of £10 of nominated income or gains that would not trigger such rules upon remittance). The application of this regime could result in more U.K. tax being paid by persons who have nominated only a small amount of income or gains than if they had actually nominated sufficient income or gains to give rise, in the aggregate, to £30,000 of
U.K. income or capital gains tax. This result could arise because, where all amounts of previously unremitted income or gains have been remitted, only the amount of income or gains actually nominated will not be taxed again when remitted. For this reason, it is generally advisable that an LTND subject to the RBC actually nominate the full amount of income or gains necessary to give rise to a U.K. tax charge of £30,000.
In addition to the above, an LTND should note that the IRS Ruling addresses only the general ability to claim a credit for the payment of a RBC to the United Kingdom. To actually claim an amount as a credit for U.S. income tax purposes, however, an LTND must also consider the application of other rules in the U.S. foreign tax credit regime that impose limitations on the ability of a person to claim a foreign tax credit. These limitations may require an LTND to defer actually claiming all or part of an otherwise creditable foreign tax, such as the RBC, to another taxable year.