Frank S. Eschmann

FE
  • Member at Eschmann & Pringle, P.A.
  • Topeka, KS 66611
  • Peer Reviews
    4.5/5.0 (1)
    Client Reviews
    100% Recommended (2)
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
  • Update your Profile

Areas of Practice (4)

  • Personal Injury
  • Auto Accidents
  • Workers Compensation
  • Professional Malpractice

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
Washburn University of Topeka, B.B.A., 1979
Law School Attended:
Washburn University of Topeka, J.D., 1985
Year of First admission:
1986
Admission:
1986, Kansas and U.S. District Court, District of Kansas; 1994, U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit; 1993, Missouri
ISLN:
907568788

Peer Reviews

  • 4.5/5.0 (1 review)
  • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.5/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.5/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.5/5.0
  • Communication

    4.5/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.5/5.0

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

  • 3.9/5.0 (2 reviews)
  • 100% (2 recommendations)
  • Communication

    4.0/5.0
  • Responsiveness

    4.0/5.0
  • Quality of Service

    4.0/5.0
  • Value for Money

    3.5/5.0
  • Recommended 5.0/5.0 Rated on 04/09/12 in Personal Injury.

    I appreciate Mr. Eschmann's hard work on my case. He was very professional, easy to talk to and always helped me understand everything. Since my case was complicated, I needed to rely on him a lot, and his advice always turned out to be right on th... Read more

    Read more

    I appreciate Mr. Eschmann's hard work on my case. He was very professional, easy to talk to and always helped me understand everything. Since my case was complicated, I needed to rely on him a lot, and his advice always turned out to be right on the mark. I was very pleased with the outcome of my case! Read less

    Read less
  • Recommended 2.8/5.0 Rated on 06/15/10 in Personal Injury.

    1. There was a lack of communication at times,{newline}2. Some things were not explained correctly and led me to believe a different outcome,{newline}3. Frank was very friendly,{newline}4. I felt some things should have been done sooner, such as witn... Read more

    Read more

    1. There was a lack of communication at times,{newline}2. Some things were not explained correctly and led me to believe a different outcome,{newline}3. Frank was very friendly,{newline}4. I felt some things should have been done sooner, such as witness interviews before {newline} so much time passed that the witnesses had forgotten the post accident events. Read less

    Read less
Disclaimer