James M. Webster, III

James M. Webster, III: Attorney with Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C.


Jim Webster is a litigation partner with extensive experience trying dozens of complex cases in federal and state courts throughout the United States. He started with the firm in 1995, left in 1998 to serve as an Assistant United States Attorney in Baltimore, and returned as a partner in 2002.

Mr. Webster's practice is characterized by the diversity of the matters he has handled. His civil expertise includes representing plaintiffs and defendants in a variety of general commercial disputes involving claims of breach of contract, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, professional malpractice, antitrust violations, and patent infringement.

In his white collar practice, Mr. Webster has defended corporations and individuals throughout the world in investigations and prosecutions concerning claims for price-fixing and other antitrust violations, FCPA violations, tax fraud, securities fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, bribery, and other violations.

Mr. Webster also has extensive experience in arbitrations, where he has recovered over $100 million for clients.


Law Clerk, Judge Paul V. Niemeyer, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, 1994-1995

Noteworthy Representations

Aribtration re 2003 NPM Adjustment. Lead trial counsel for the common interests of over 40 states and territories in an arbitration against all the major tobacco companies. At stake were over a billion dollars in claims by the tobacco companies for adjustments of the settlement payments they made to the states in 2003 as a result of the 1998 global settlement agreement between the tobacco companies and the states.

BT Triple Crown Merger Co. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., No. 09-600899 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.). Trial counsel for private equity funds in a multibillion-dollar breach of contract action against six prominent banks to force them to fulfill their commitment to finance a leveraged buyout of Clear Channel Commuincations. Shortly after trial commenced in 2008, the banks settled and agreed to fund the transaction.

GARCO Investments LLP, et al. v. Sprint Corporation, et al.,Case No. 04CV01714 (Kan. Dist. Ct.) and State of New Jersey and its Division of Investment, v. Sprint Corporation, et al., Case No. 03-2071-JWL (D. KS.). Lead counsel for the former CEO and COO of Sprint Corp., in a series of federal and state cases asserting claims against them for securities fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. Secured dismissal of all claims.

Coleman Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley, Inc., Case No. CA 03-5045 AI (Fla. Cir. Ct.). Three days before trial commenced in 2005, Mr. Webster replaced prior defense counsel and assumed responsibility for trying multibillion-dollar claims against Morgan Stanley. All claims were dismissed pursuant to directed verdict.

Government Service

Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, District of Maryland, 1998-2002

Areas of Practice (1)

  • Litigation

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
202.326.7915  Phone
University Attended:
University of Virginia, B.A., 1990
Law School Attended:
Columbia University Law School, J.D., with honors, 1994
Year of First Admission:
1994, Maryland; 1996, District of Columbia
Birth Information:
Baltimore, Maryland, May 11, 1968

Peer Reviews

This lawyer does not have peer reviews.

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Washington, District of Columbia

Contact James M. Webster, III

Required Fields

Required Fields

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.