Jerry Stouck

Jerry Stouck: Attorney with Greenberg Traurig, LLP AV stamp icon
  • Shareholder; Chair, Federal Regulatory and Administrative Litigation at Greenberg Traurig, LLP (2024 Attorneys)
  • 2101 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20037
    View Jerry Stouck's office location
  • Peer Reviews

    5.0/5.0
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
    • #947 in weekly profile views out of 55,144 Attorneys in Washington, DC
    • #42,536 in weekly profile views out of 1,822,458 total attorneys Overall
Attorney Awards

Biography

Jerry Stouck Chairs the Federal Regulatory and Administrative Law Practice and has more than 35 years of trial and appellate litigation experience in a wide range of cases and courts. He has particular experience in complex business, regulatory and environmental disputes with government agencies. Jerry regularly challenges federal agency action under various regulatory regimes, and has represented the lead parties in several very large and important cases seeking monetary relief from the federal government. He also handles environmental and land use litigation, including related contract/commercial disputes, and has deep experience with eminent domain and Fifth Amendment regulatory takings claims. Jerry appears frequently in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and Federal Circuit, in the D.C. federal district court and D.C. Circuit, and in other trial and appellate courts across the country.

Concentrations

•Complex business and regulatory litigation
•Environmental and land use litigation
•Eminent domain/regulatory takings litigation
•Monetary claims against federal agencies

Clerkships

•Hon. Raymond J. Pettine, U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, Super Lawyers magazine, Washington, D.C. Super Lawyers, 2013-2018
•Team Member, U.S. News - Best Lawyers, Best Law Firms Edition, Law Firm of the Year, Real Estate - Litigation, 2017
•Team Member, U.S. News - Best Lawyers, Best Law Firms Edition, Law Firm of the Year, Environmental Law, 2016
•Team Member, Daily Business Review's Real Estate Litigation Department of the Year, 2015
•Team Member, a Law360 Appellate Practice Group of the Year, 2010
•Rated, AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5

Areas of Practice (5)

  • Litigation
  • Appellate
  • Federal Regulatory & Administrative Law
  • Environmental
  • Trial Practice

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
202.331.3173  Phone
202.331.3101  Fax
www.gtlaw.com/People/Jerry-Stouck
University Attended:
Wesleyan University, B.A., magna cum laude, 1977
Law School Attended:
New York University School of Law, J.D., 1980
Year of First Admission:
1981
Admission:
District of Columbia; Maryland; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit; U.S. Court of Federal Claims; U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; Supreme Court of the United States; U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
Memberships:

Professional & Community Involvement

•Co-Chair, D.C. Lawyers for Children's Hospital Annual Golf Classic
•Member, American Bar Association
•Member, Court of Federal Claims Advisory Council
•Member, Federal Circuit Bar Association Amicus Briefing Committee

Birth Information:
Washington, D.C., March 24, 1955
Reported Cases:
Experience: Federal and State Liability Cases: Obtained $142 million damages award after trial for three nuclear utility companies in New England on breach of contract claim arising from U.S. DOE's failure to remove utilities' spent nuclear fuel to the Yucca Mountain, NV disposal site. Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. US, 94 Fed. Cl. 678 (2010); see 73 Fed. Cl. 249 (Fed. Cl. 2006).; Won summary judgment for a major West coast financial institution in one of the first Winstar savings and loan contract cases, 26 Cl. Ct. 904 (1992); argued consolidated Winstar appeal to Federal Circuit panel, 994 F.2d 797 (Fed. Cir. 1993), and en banc court, 64 F.3d 1531 (Fed. Cir. 1995); was counsel of record in appeal to U.S. Supreme Court, 518 U.S. 839 (1996), and at subsequent trial on claim for damages exceeding $1 billion, see 43 Fed. Cl. 390 (1999). Also represented 11 other Winstar-related plaintiffs.; Represents three Medicare equipment providers advancing breach of contract and takings claims arising from Congressional enactment terminating and directing reprocurement of previously awarded contracts. See CardioSom v US, 91 Fed. Cl. 659 (2010), rev'd, 656 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2011), on remand, 115 Fed. Cl. 761 (2014) and No. 08-533C, 2014 WL 2937920 (Fed. Cl. Jun. 30, 2014). Following favorable liability decision in lead case, now proceeding to damages discovery and trials.; Represented plaintiffs in several other spent nuclear fuel cases, including one leading to $89 million award for a major West Coast utility. Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. US., 92 Fed. Cl.175 (2010), aff'd, 668 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Negotiated a settlement of that case, together with a related case seeking additional, subsequent-period damages of $204 million, for payment by U.S. of $266 million in 2012, plus periodic later payments of on-going damages.; Represented numerous utility companies in challenge to retroactive imposition of a $2.25 billion federal tax, first on contract grounds, Yankee Atomic Elec. Co. v. US, 33 Fed. Cl. 580 (1995), rev'd, 112 F.3d 1569 (Fed. Cir. 1997), then on constitutional grounds, see Commonwealth Edison Co v US, 271 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2001).; Represent large public university that holds patent on important technology used in Alzheimer's disease research in seeking damages from the United States, under 28 U.S. C. 1498, for infringement of the patent by federal grantees. Univ. of South Florida v. United States, No. 15-1549 (Fed. Cl.); Obtained federal appellate decision upholding Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in federal court for public university in Florida, on ground that the school was an arm of the state. Univ. of South Florida v. CoMentis Inc., 861 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2017).; Authored amicus brief cited and followed by the en banc Federal Circuit in a landmark patent infringement case against the U.S. under 28 U.S.C. 1498, which provides damages for infringement by the government and its contractors and grantees. See Zoltek Corp. v. US, 67 F.3d 1309 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (en banc).; Represented cigar manufacturer in challenge to methodology for calculating federal tobacco transition payments. See Prime Time Int'l Co. v. Vilsack, 599 F.3d 678 (D.C. Cir. 2010), on remand, 930 F. Supp. 2d 240 (D.D.C. 2013), aff'd, 753 F.3d 1339 (2014).; Represented owner of a large private marina challenging, in the Florida Supreme Court, the real estate tax exemption provided to a competing municipal marina under a state constitutional provision exempting from tax property that is used for a municipal or public purpose. Treasure Coast Marina, LC v. City of Ft. Pierce, __So. 3d __(Fla. 2017).; Environmental Cases: Represent State of North Dakota in litigation challenging EPA's Clean Power Plan regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from electric generating units.North Dakota v. EPA, No. 15-1381 (DC Cir.).Obtainedstay of the regulation from the U.S. Supreme Court .See 136 U.S. 999 (2016).; Represented plaintiff in environmental litigation against DOE, EPA, and other government agencies seeking federal remediation of residual radioactive contamination from uranium ore milling in the 1950's for the U.S. nuclear weapons programs. See El Paso Natural Gas Co. v US, 605 F. Supp. 2d 224 (D.D.C. 2009), aff'd, 632 F.3d 1272 (D.C. Cir. 2011), on remand, 847 F. Supp.2d 211 (D.D.C. 2012), aff'd, 750 F.3d 863 (D.C. Cir. 2014).; Represented national trade association challenging revised air emission standards for chromium issued by EPA under the Clean Air Act following a risk and technology (RTR) review. National Assoc. for Surface Finishing v. EPA, 795 F.3d 1 (D.C.Cir. 2015).; Represented real estate industry group in litigation seeking to require EPA to impose a stormwater discharge permitting program throughout the Charles River watershed. Conservation Law Foundation v. EPA, No. 15-11727 (D.Mass.).; Argued Federal Circuit appeal establishing federal liability to all utilities in the spent nuclear fuel damages litigation. Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co. v US, 225 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2000).; Challenged a D.C. Circuit DOE administrative action aimed at justifying DOE's failure to perform spent fuel removal contracts. Northern States Power Co. v DOE, 128 F.3d. 754 (D.C. Cir. 1997).; Land Use and Regulatory Taking/Eminent Domain Cases: Represents developer of prominent Florida coastal community in a takings case establishing a key precedent on the parcel-as-a-whole and Lucas/residual value issues. See Lost Tree Village Corp. v. US, 707 F.3d. 1286 (Fed. Cir. 2013), rev'g, 100 Fed. Cl. 412 (2011), on remand, 115 Fed. Cl. 219 (2014), aff'd, 787 Fed. 3d 1111 (Fed. Cir. 2015).; Represented Town of Palm Beach, Florida, in litigation to establish federal responsibility to remediate beach erosion resulting from a navigation channel constructed and maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Town of Palm Beach, Fla. v. US, No. 09-64 (Fed. Cl.). Settlement achieved in 2013 provides enhanced beach protection and renourishment for the Town.; Obtained just compensation award plus attorneys' fees from U.S. for real estate developer after trial in takings case arising from federal denial of a wetlands development permit, Cooley v US, 46 Fed. Cl. 538 (2000); after appeal, see 324 F.3d 1297 (Fed. Cir. 2003), obtained monetary settlement (including attorneys' fees) plus valid permit and right to complete mixed-use commercial development on the 30-acre wetlands site.; Authored U.S. Supreme Court amicus brief of ten real estate industry groups, led by the National Association of Home Builders, in Murr v. Wisconsin, No. 15-214, involving the relevant parcel or parcel-as-a-whole doctrine.
ISLN:
903374123

Peer Reviews

5.0/5.0
A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Documents (9)

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com

Washington, District of Columbia

Contact Jerry Stouck

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.