John K. Crisham

John K. Crisham: Attorney with Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Shareholder at Greenberg Traurig, LLP (2024 Attorneys)
  • 2101 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20037
    View John K. Crisham's other office locations
  • Peer Reviews

    No Reviews
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
    • #947 in weekly profile views out of 55,144 Attorneys in Washington, DC
    • #42,536 in weekly profile views out of 1,822,458 total attorneys Overall

Biography

John Crisham represents clients in high-stakes, sensitive, and complex civil litigation matters, in state and federal trial and appellate courts across the country. Before joining the firm, John was a litigation partner in the Washington, D.C. office of another prominent international law firm.

Concentrations

•Complex civil and business litigation
•Litigation of legal issues in state and federal appellate courts
•Product liability and mass tort litigation

Clerkships

•Circuit Judge Paul J. Kelly, Jr., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Areas of Practice (4)

  • Litigation
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Pharmaceutical, Medical Device & Health Care Litigation
  • Appellate

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
303.685.7453  Phone
202.331.3101  Fax
www.gtlaw.com/People/John-K-Crisham
University Attended:
University of Notre Dame, B.A., 2000
Law School Attended:
Notre Dame Law School, J.D., cum laude, Thomas J. White Scholar, Article Editor, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2005
Year of First Admission:
2005
Admission:
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado; Colorado; District of Columbia; Supreme Court of the United States
Memberships:

Professional & Community Involvement

•Member, William E. Doyle Inn of Court
•Member, Colorado Bar Association
•Member, Denver Bar Association
•Member, Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce Health & Wellness Committee
•Member, Tenth Circuit Historical Society

Reported Cases:
Experience: Representative Matters: Representing Fortune 50 company in defense of complex commercial and employment class actions in state and federal courts nationwide.; Representing Fortune 50 company, at state trial and appellate court levels, in litigation challenging the constitutionality of regional transportation authority's sales-and-use tax regime.; Secured dismissal for a Fortune 50 company of a Lanham Act false-advertising lawsuit; Secured dismissal for a Fortune 50 company of a putative class-action lawsuit asserting claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act; Representing large, privately-held federal and state government contractor in a putative class-action litigation filed in federal court.; Represented former owner of petroleum refinery in two-and-a-half week arbitration hearing concerning claims in excess of $100 million arising from alleged corrosion-related failure of buried pipe, and subsequent release of petroleum product, at refinery. Case settled on a confidential basis prior to final ruling.; Mutual Pharm. Co. v. Bartlett, 133 S. Ct. 2466 (2013): secured U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that the Hatch-Waxman Act preempts state-law tort claims targeting the design/composition of generic drug products.; PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing, 131 S. Ct. 2567 (2011): secured U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that the Hatch-Waxman Act preempts state-law tort claims challenging generic product warnings.; Susan B. Anthony List, et al. v. Driehaus, et al., No. 13-193 (S. Ct. 2014 Term): amicus counsel for the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education in case involving the appropriate ripeness standard for free speech pre-enforcement challenges brought under the First Amendment.; Wagner v. Teva Pharms USA., Inc., 840 F.3d 355 (7th Cir. 2016): successfully defended district court's dismissal of state-law tort claims predicated on allegedly inadequate labeling and design on federal preemption grounds.; Brinkley v. PLIVA, Inc ., 772 F.3d 1133 (8th Cir. 2014): successfully defended district court's dismissal of state-law tort strict liability design defect, strict liability failure to warn, negligence, and breach of express and implied warranty claims on federal preemption grounds.; In re Darvocet, Darvon, and Propoxyphene Prods. Liab. Litig ., 756 F.3d 917 (6th Cir. 2014): successfully defended district court's dismissal of multi-district litigation plaintiffs' state-law tort claims on federal preemption grounds.; In re Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. II), 751 F.3d 150 (3d Cir. 2014): successfully defended district court's dismissal of multi-district litigation plaintiffs' state-law design-defect and other tort claims on grounds of federal preemption.; Drager v. PLIVA USA, Inc., 741 F.3d 470 (4th Cir. 2014): successfully defended district court's holding that plaintiffs' state-law negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, and misrepresentation and fraud claims all are preempted by federal law.; Abrahamsen v. ConocoPhillips Co., 2014 WL 2884870 (Del. Sup. Ct. May 30, 2014): secured dismissal, as a matter of Delaware forum non conveniens law, of four complaints asserting Delaware personal-injury claims that over one hundred Norwegian workers allegedly incurred while working on oil rigs and platforms in the North Sea.; Wells v. Allergan USA, Inc., et al ., 2014 WL 117773 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2014): secured dismissal of various state-law tort claims asserted against Class III medical device manufacturer as preempted by the Medical Device Amendments to the Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act.; Henderson v. Palmer, 730 F.3d 554 (6th Cir. 2013): on behalf of pro bono client, secured reversal of district court's denial of habeas corpus petition, allowing client to assert his claims on the merits in the district court.; Washington v. Medicis Pharms. Corp ., 2013 WL 496063 (S.D. Miss. Feb. 7, 2013): on behalf of manufacturer of generic drug product, secured dismissal of various state-law tort claims premised on innovator liability theory.; Cook v. Rockwell Int'l Corp., 618 F.3d 1127 (10th Cir. 2010): secured reversal of $926 million judgment in favor of plaintiff class in nuclear environmental contamination case on a variety of grounds, including erroneous interpretation of the federal Price-Anderson Act establishing claims for nuclear-related liability, erroneous approach to preemption of state law by federal nuclear safety standards, and erroneous interpretation of the Colorado common law of trespass and nuisance.; United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al., 566 F.3d 1095 (D.C. Cir. 2009): secured reversal and remand of client-specific rulings made by district court in $280 billion RICO/health care recovery action brought by the Department of Justice.; Secured dismissal of dozens of state and federal cases at the motion-to-dismiss and summary-judgment stages on federal preemption grounds on behalf of Teva Pharmaceuticals, Baxter Healthcare, Ranbaxy Laboratories, and other prescription drug manufacturers.; Counsel for Teva Pharmaceuticals and related entities in nationwide products-liability litigation involving unapproved drugs.; Counsel for Teva Pharmaceuticals and related entities in complex multidistrict commercial litigation involving more than 20 cases brought by state Attorneys General alleging Medicaid/Medicare fraud and unfair competition based on purported inflation of published drug prices (AWP/WAC).; Counsel for Baxter International and Teva Pharmaceuticals in major product-liability litigation involving anesthesia product.; The above representations were handled by Mr. Crisham prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
ISLN:
919024227

Peer Reviews

This lawyer does not have peer reviews.

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Washington, District of Columbia

Contact John K. Crisham

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.