Scott H. Angstreich

Scott H. Angstreich: Attorney with Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C.

Biography

Scott Angstreich’s practice encompasses a wide array of regulatory, litigation, and appellate matters, with a particular focus on administrative law and telecommunications. He has argued more than 45 appeals, including before the United States Supreme Court, eleven different United States Courts of Appeals, and two state supreme courts, as well as more than 25 dispositive motions in federal district courts and state trial courts.

Publications

The Insiders’ Guide to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in Council of Appellate Lawyers, Appellate Practice Compendium (2012) (co-author, with Andrew S. Oldham)

Shoring Up Chevron: A Defense of Seminole Rock Deference to Agency Regulatory Interpretations, 34 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 49 (2000)

Multinational Merger Review: Lessons from Our Federalism, 68 Antitrust L.J. 219 (2000) (co-author, with Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg)

The Rules Enabling Act and the Limits of Rule 23, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 2294 (1998)

Comment, Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 309 (1997)

Clerkship

Law Clerk, Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, 1998-1999

OTHER

•John M. Olin Research fellow in Law and Economics, Harvard Law School, 1999-2000

•John M. Olin fellow in Law, Georgetown University Law Center, 1999-2000

in Law and Economics at the Harvard Law School. He is the author of Shoring Up Chevron: A Defense of Seminole Rock Deference to Agency Regulatory Interpretations, 34 U.C. Davis Law Review 49 (2000), and the co-author of Multilateral Merger Review, 68 Antitrust Law Journal 219 (2000).

Areas of Practice (5)

  • Appellate Litigation
  • Telecommunications
  • FCC Regulation
  • U.S. Supreme Court Litigation
  • Administrative Hearings and Appeals

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
University Attended:
Princeton University, A.B., summa cum laude, 1993; Oxford University, Balliol College, M.Phil., Politics, 1995
Law School Attended:
Harvard Law School, J.D., magna cum laude, 1998
Year of First Admission:
1999
Admission:
2004, U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas, U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Court of Appeals, First, Second and Third Circuits; 2006, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit; 2008, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit; 2005, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit; 2006, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit; 2010, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit; 2004, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas; 2005, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 2008, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit; 2001, District of Columbia; 1999, New York; 2001, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Birth Information:
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, October 14, 1971
Reported Cases:
Noteworthy Representations: Peerless Network, Inc. v. MCI Communications Services, Inc., No. 18-2747 (7th Cir. Jan. 14, 2019); SoundExchange, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board, 904 F.3d 41 (D.C. Cir. 2018); Cobb County v. BellSouth Telecomms., LLC, 802 S.E.2d 686 (Ga. Ct. Appeals 2017); Johnson v. American Towers, LLC, 781 F.3d 693 (4th Cir. 2015); U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Verizon Communications Inc., 761 F.3d 409 (5th Cir. 2014); In re: FCC 11-161, 753 F.3d 1015 (10th Cir. 2014); In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litig., 673 F.3d 381 (5th Cir.), on reh'g, 696 F.3d 436 (5th Cir. 2012); Talk America Inc. v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co., 131 S. Ct. 2254 (2011)
ISLN:
913773121

Peer Reviews

This lawyer does not have peer reviews.

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Washington, District of Columbia

Contact Scott H. Angstreich

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.