John H. Newcomer, Jr.

John H. Newcomer, Jr.: Attorney with Morris James LLP


John practices in the areas of real estate and commercial litigation. His experience in these dual fields provides his clients with a rare perspective in dealing with complex real estate and business matters. Understanding the dynamics of litigation, and how it impacts his clients' business strategies, gives John the ability to draft transactional documents with an eye towards avoiding problems before they arise.

John chairs Morris James' Real Estate Group. In his real estate practice, he represents landowners and developers in the acquisition, improvement and financing of properties in Delaware, including hotels, medical and assisted living facilities, apartments, shopping centers and malls, restaurants, residential developments, schools, condominiums, warehouses and other industrial sites. He also assists clients with the review and negotiation of leases.

John's litigation practice involves a wide range of business, contract, and real property disputes. His experience includes cases dealing with land purchase and sale agreements, construction defects, leases, adverse possession of real property, zoning and deed restrictions, mortgage foreclosures, breach of fiduciary duties, non-compete agreements, employment and tenure disputes, and estate litigation. He is frequently called upon to assist clients of other members in the firm when they become involved in complex disputes involving their real estate or other commercial transactions. John also handles mechanic's lien actions. His experience as a certified mediator of the Delaware Superior Court gives John the additional insight to resolve his clients' disputes before they turn into costly litigation.


Delaware Business Litigation Report

Delaware Healthcare Industry Blog


Downtown Newark Partnership, Volunteer of the Year Award


• Acquisition, financing and development of apartments, assisted living facilities, medical complexes, condominiums, hotels, residential developments, restaurants, schools and shopping centers

• Commercial real estate leasing, including solar leases

• Purchase and sale of small businesses

• Litigation involving construction defects

• Litigation involving breach of contract

• Litigation involving the sale and valuation of businesses

• Mechanics' Liens

Community Affiliations

Commercial - Industrial Realty Council of New Castle County

Committee of 100

Downtown Newark Partnership, Executive Board, Past Member

Downtown Newark Partnership, Parking Committee, Past Chairman

St. Philip's Lutheran Church, Past Board Member and Chairman

Recent Matters

Recent Transactional Experience

Sale of nursing home properties valued in excess of $90 million

Refinance of commercial properties with loan in excess of $100 million

Refinance of residential construction projects

Refinance of apartment complex loan through Freddie Mac

Acquisition, financing and development of shopping center projects

Acquisition, financing and development of hotels

Acquisition and development of land for new schools

Redevelopment of commercial projects through use of condominium regime

Representative Litigation Matters

Reybold Venture Group XI-A, LLC v. Atlantic Meridian Crossing, LLC

Represented landowner in breach of contract action involving the sale of land and payment of development expenses in connection with a large subdivision in New Castle County. Several of the defendants entered into a settlement agreement relating to the release of lots, and a judgment was entered against other parties arising from their failure to pay their required share of the build-out of the common areas of the project.

Davidson v. Deery

Represented 50% owner of two apartment complexes in dispute with the other owner, who controlled the management of the two properties. Settlement agreement reached whereby properties were marketed and then sold, with proceeds of sale equitably distributed among owners.

Wharton v. Worldwide Dedicated Services

Represented company providing medical review of laboratory findings of drugs in blood of terminated employee. Summary judgment granted in favor of medical review company, based on the record evidence that the company followed the federal regulations regarding the employee's drug test.

Manzo v. Rite Aid Corp.

Represented accounting firm in class action in which the plaintiff filed claims of common law fraud and equitable fraud against all defendants, a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against all the inside directors and audit committee directors, and a claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty against the accounting firm. Motion to dismiss granted, with prejudice, as to accounting firm on aiding and abetting claims.

Eastern Shore Environmental, Inc. v. Kent County Dept. of Planning

Represented governmental respondents in action brought to challenge denial of plaintiff's application to operate a waste transfer station in Kent County. Motion to dismiss granted as to due process claims, as well as claims against individual levy court commissioners.

Hudson v. Wesley College

Represented college in an action brought by a professor who was denied tenure. Following trial and post-trial briefing, the court ruled in favor of the college, finding that the plaintiff failed to document either material misrepresentations or material omissions by the college president to the Board of Trustees, that the preponderance of the evidence demonstrated that the Trustees based their vote on reasonably accurate information, and that the Trustees did not premise their vote to deny plaintiff tenure on misleading information presented as a result of bad faith or an intent to act unfairly.

Santora, Starr and Baffone, P.A. v. Lewis

Represented accounting firm in action against former employee who failed to pay certain damages to employer upon leaving the firm and taking clients with him. Court ruled in favor of accounting firm, finding that employee could not claim credits for payments made by another person against liabilities owed to accounting firm.

In re: Goldstein Estate Litigation

Represented administrator of estate in complex dispute among family members arising from extensive land holdings of decedents. Protracted litigation was settled on the eve of trial, with the family members conceding to most of the administrator's claims that properties in dispute were assets of the estate. Following settlement, assisted the administrator with the sale and disposition of numerous properties.

In re: Estate of Getchell

Represented pension plan beneficiary in dispute over disbursement of plan assets claimed to be property of the decedent's estate. The court ruled in favor of the beneficiary, finding that the plan assets were properly designated as distributable to the beneficiary, rather than to the estate.

St. Mary's Coptic Church v. Daystar Sills

Represented church in dispute with contractor over methods of construction and delays in completing the project. Contractor refused to obtain the necessary certificate of occupancy to allow the church to occupy its new building. A settlement was negotiated pursuant to which the contractor completed the work, the certificate of occupancy was obtained, and the parties submitted their remaining disputes to binding arbitration under the terms of the construction contract. The remaining claims were settled after two days of arbitration.

Danforth v. Acorn Structures, Inc.

Represented property owner in dispute over construction defects. The Delaware Supreme Court ruled that the damages claimed by the property owner were barred by the economic loss doctrine. Dissatisfied with that result, John introduced legislation in the Delaware General Assembly, which was ultimately signed into law, that had the effect of "overruling" the Delaware Supreme Court's decision.

News & Events

News & Media Mentions

• Morris James Partners Host Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act Webinar For ALFA International

October 11, 2016

• Morris James to Sponsor the Wilmington and Southern Delaware Heart Balls

February 26, 2014

• Morris James Launches Delaware's First Healthcare Industry Blog

May 15, 2013

Professional Affiliations

Delaware Superior Court, Certified Mediator

Delaware State Bar Association, Real Estate Section

Delaware State Bar Association, Ethics Committee, Past Member

Richard S. Rodney Inn of Court, Master of the Bench

American Bar Association, Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Section

Delaware Board of Bar Examiners, Past Associate Member

Areas of Practice (5)

  • Business Litigation
  • Healthcare Industry Team
  • Land Use
  • Legal Opinions
  • Real Estate

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
302.888.6975  Phone
302.571.1750  Fax
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 2306, Wilmington, DE 19899-2306
University Attended:
Dickinson College, B.A., cum laude, 1981
Law School Attended:
Wake Forest University School of Law, J.D., 1984
Year of First admission:
1984, Delaware; United States District Court, District of Delaware; U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Birth Information:
Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, July 23, 1959

Peer Reviews

  • 4.4/5.0 (1)
  • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.
  • Legal Knowledge

  • Analytical Capability

  • Judgment

  • Communication

  • Legal Experience

  • John H. Newcomer, Jr.

    4.0/5.0 by a Partner on 04/28/14 in Commercial Litigation on 04/28/14

    • Legal Knowledge

    • Analytical Capability

    • Judgment

    • Communication

    • Legal Experience

    Read less

*Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews

Rating Not Shown
This attorney has chosen not to display reviews provided by their clients

Write a Review

Documents ({{amountArticles}})

Documents by this lawyer on
Other documents: ,

Wilmington, Delaware

Contact John H. Newcomer, Jr.

Please correct the fields highlighted in red.

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.