Kevin J. Connors

Kevin J. Connors: Attorney with Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C.
  • Shareholder; Managing Attorney, Wilmington, DE Office; Chair, Casualty Practice Group Wilmington, DE Office at Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C. (495 Attorneys)
  • Nemours Building, 1007 N. Orange Street, 6th Floor, Wilmington, DE 19801
    View Kevin J. Connors's office location
  • Kevin J. Connors is the Managing Partner of Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin's Wilmington, Delaware office. He is also the Chair of the Casualty Practice Group for Delaware. Kevin handles catastrophic injury and damages claims, involving product liability, construction defect, motor vehicle, fire and property claims, premises liability, and toxic tort litigation.
  • Peer Reviews
    4.4/5.0 (1)
    Client Reviews
    No Reviews
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]


As a member of the casualty department, Kevin handles catastrophic injury and damages claims involving product liability, construction defect, motor vehicle, fire and property claims, liquor liability, premises liability and toxic tort litigation. In addition to his extensive experience in casualty insurance defense litigation, Kevin has defended numerous defamation, commercial libel and professional malpractice cases.

Kevin also dedicates part of his practice to defending of municipal liability cases under 42 U.S.C. 1983. He frequently represents police officers, police departments and municipalities in police liability claims, including claims for false arrest, malicious prosecution, excessive force, as well as non-police employees in claims based upon their work on behalf of the municipality. Kevin defends municipalities and government agencies against premises liability, automobile accident, property damage and related tort claims arising under state law.

Additional, Kevin has significant experience handling employment discrimination and wrongful discharge cases under federal and state law. He routinely appears before the Delaware Human Relations Commission, the Delaware Department of Labor and in the Delaware Court of Chancery in matters of equity.

Kevin has served as managing attorney of the firm's Wilmington, Delaware, office since its inception in 1995. As managing shareholder of the Wilmington office, Kevin oversees the day-to-day operations for the entire office, ensuring that client matters are handled promptly, professionally and effectively.

Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey in 1993, Kevin was a partner with the firm of Liebert, Short and Hirshland in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where he practiced law for 11 years. After graduating from law school, Kevin served as a law clerk to former Associate Justice John J. McNeilly of the Delaware Supreme Court, Delaware's highest appellate court.

Classes/Seminars Taught

•Taught seminars: strict liability, motor vehicle, and Pennsylvania and Delaware Insurance law (1990-2007)

Past Employment Positions

•Supreme Court of Delaware, Hon. John J. McNeilly, Associate Justice, Law Clerk, 1981 - 1982

Year Joined Organization:1993


Marshall Dennehey Relocates Wilmington Office to Nemours Building
October 27, 2014
Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman and Goggin has relocated from North Market Street in downtown Wilmington to the landmark Nemours building. Effective today, the office's new address is 1007 N. Orange Street, Suite 600, Wilmington, DE 19801. All telephone numbers remain the same, with the exception...


On the Pulse...Profile of Our Wilmington, Delaware Office
Defense Digest Article • September 1, 2013
by Kevin J. Connors, Esq.*It is hard to imagine that over eight years have passed since I was asked to write about the Wilmington, Delaware, office of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. I do so now with great pride in the invaluable..., Defense Digest, Vol. 19, No. 3, September 2013Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide...

Delaware Premises Liability
Defense Digest Article • September 1, 2012
Key Points:The Supreme Court of Delaware confirms that willful and wanton common law premises liability standard applies to both trespassers and licensees.Defense practitioners must hold non-business invitee plaintiffs to this..., Defense Digest, Vol. 18, No. 3, September 2012

Areas of Practice (9)

  • Insurance Law
  • Appeals
  • Product Liability
  • Employment Law
  • Civil Rights Law
  • Municipal Defense
  • Professional Malpractice
  • Toxic Tort Law
  • Hospitality and Liquor Liability

Education & Credentials

Contact Information:
(302) 552-4302  Phone
(302) 552-4340  Fax
University Attended:
University of Virginia, B.A., with High Distinction, 1977
Law School Attended:
Villanova University School of Law, Villanova, Pennsylvania, J.D., 1981
Year of First Admission:
1983, U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit; 1982, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania; 1982, District Court District of Delaware; 1982, Delaware; 1982, Pennsylvania

Associations & Memberships

•Defense Counsel of Delaware
•Defense Research Institute
•Delaware Bar Association
•Delaware Claims Association
•Trial Attorneys of America

Reported Cases:
Significant Representative Matters: Successfully represented publisher of magazine in commercial trade libel case. Major insurer of podiatrists sued rival insurance company and publisher for advertisement claiming plaintiff would be unable to meet coverage obligations in the future. Plaintiff's claims were predicated upon interference with contracts and violation of the federal Lanham Act. Following a week-long trial, jury determined publisher was not liable under any theory. Defense verdict was upheld on appeal to Third Circuit Court of Appeals.; Jury verdict for defense in product liability action alleging manufacturing defect in electric timer caused significant property damage. Plaintiffs sought to support claim of product defect with fire cause and origin experts. Defense successfully presented independent electrical engineers and in-house experts who proved fire was caused by device not associated with the timer.; Summary judgment and affirmance on appeal by Delaware Supreme Court in wrongful death case wherein decedent's representative sought to bring a direct cause of action against plaintiff's employer. Delaware Supreme Court, in affirming matter, clarified permissible basis for bringing and supporting a direct cause of action against a plaintiff's employer. This case is often cited by defense counsel in matters involving the workers' compensation exclusivity bar.; Summary judgment entered in favor of defendant. Represented tenant store in large outlet shopping mall from which an allegedly false alarm was emitted. A police officer, attempting to respond to alarm, struck a motor vehicle, flipping it over several times. One child was killed, and there were other significant injuries to other vehicle occupants. The basis for Motion for Summary Judgment was absence of a duty of care under the factual circumstances of the case as a matter of law. Decision upheld by the Delaware Supreme Court.; Represented excavator in case wherein a gas explosion occurred and most of a city block was leveled with serious injuries to certain individuals, lesser injuries to others and questionable injuries to multiple other parties. Basis for the litigation was failure to properly mark underground utilities prior to excavation. Key issue was employment status of a particular individual. During trial, the matter successfully settled.; Jury returned verdict for defense in product liability case against power tool manufacturer. Trial featured testimony by engineering experts concerning an on/off switch on a power saw. First trial resulted in hung jury. Second trial resulted in non-suit in favor of defense. Defense demonstrated that plaintiff's expert had mixed up critical pieces of power saw, establishing that the factual basis for his opinions were invalid.; Jury verdict in favor of defendant escalator manufacturer in product liability action alleging design defect in end plate/comb plate configuration, causing plaintiff to have toes amputated. Plaintiff's expert opined that comb plate was defective in not being designed to break off in a wedge-in contact. The defense successfully demonstrated that plaintiff misused escalator and illustrated safety features of comb plate/end plate and escalator in general.; Summary judgment obtained in claim by prisoner that corporate health care provider in the state's prison system was deliberately indifferent in violation of 1983 civil rights and medically negligent in failing to afford plaintiff treatment for an allegedly serious medical condition. Plaintiff claimed he suffered from number of distinct medical conditions and had exhausted all administrative remedies prior to filing suit. Summary judgment was awarded on the grounds that plaintiff received proper medical care and failed to exhaust all administrative remedies.; Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Motion to Dismiss in favor of councilpersons against whom a political candidate filed a 1983 civil rights claim alleging violations of his civil rights by making defamatory remarks against him in retaliation for exercising his first amendment rights to free speech and petition. Plaintiff sought restrictions for election signs during political campaigns and spoke to defendant councilpersons opposed to proposed legislative restrictions. Plaintiff's complaint alleged that a newspaper reported that defendant councilpersons said plaintiff had made threatening remarks to them, which caused plaintiff to suffer damages and injury to his reputation. Defendants asserted plaintiff failed to demonstrate it was clearly established that an individual had a constitutional right not to be subjected to defamatory remarks in retaliation for engaging in constitutionally protected first amendment activity. The Court engaged in extended discussion of client councilpersons' defense of qualified immunity and granted their Motion to Dismiss on theory of qualified immunity.; Published Works: Delaware Premises Liability, Defense Digest, Vol. 18, No. 3, September 2012; The Admissibility of Vehicle Photographs and the Correlation of Minimal Damages with Minimal Injuries, Defense Digest, Vol. 9, No. 4, December, 2003; Note, Commonwealth v. Bussey, 26 Villanova Law Review 205, 1981
Payment Information:

    Peer Reviews

    • 4.4/5.0 (1 review)
    • A Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating.
    • Legal Knowledge

    • Analytical Capability

    • Judgment

    • Communication

    • Legal Experience


    *Peer Reviews provided before April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

    Client Reviews

    This attorney does not have client reviews.

    Documents (2)

    Documents by this lawyer on

    Wilmington, Delaware

    Contact Kevin J. Connors

    Required Fields

    Required Fields

    By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

    You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.