Practice Areas & Industries: Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

 





Group Profile Lawyers in this Group Offices Locations for this Group
 

Practice/Industry Group Overview

"An impressive firm that is very much on the ball. They explain very clearly the pros and cons of a certain strategy and help us to the best outcome.’” – Chambers USA

Cadwalader's Intellectual Property team is known for its depth of experience and exceptional capabilities in all intellectual property matters. Our lawyers help clients maximize their investments in intellectual property and protect their market assets, whether that requires enforcing or defending IP claims in litigation and trials, or providing expert opinions, or evaluating and selling or licensing intellectual property, or obtaining comprehensive/strategic IP protection, or conducting due diligence.

The lawyers who advise in these areas include a growing number of nationally and internationally recognized intellectual property lawyers who hold Ph.D., bio-medical, engineering and other advanced scientific degrees and who are highly experienced in range of technologies - mechanical and electro-mechanical subject matters, computer hardware/software, business methods, financial services, cellular telephone and semiconductor technologies, sophisticated medical devices, chemical and pharmaceutical matters, and complex biotechnologies. Our lawyers have even helped clients obtain pioneer patent protection in new emerging technologies, such as the famous "Priceline" patent, which was successfully asserted in litigation.

Many of our IP lawyers have also been serving in prestigious leadership positions with and remain active members of key bar associations, including the New York Intellectual Property Law Association (NYIPLA), the International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association (ITCTLA), the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), the Licensing Executives Society (LES), Intellectual Property Owners (IPO), the Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law and Intellectual Property Sections of the New York State Bar Association and the American Bar Association.


 
 
Articles Authored by Lawyers at this office:

Federal Circuit Rules No Per Se Prohibition Against Injunctions for FRAND-Encumbered Standard Essential Patents
Alexander J. Hadjis,Tihua Huang,Kristin L. Yohannan, May 07, 2014
On April 25, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in the appeal from Judge Posner’s ruling that denied both Motorola and Apple damages and injunctive relief in Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. This decision not only revived Apple and...

Federal Circuit Rules No Per Se Prohibition Against Injunctions for FRAND - Encumbered Standard Essential Patents
, May 02, 2014
On April 25, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in the appeal from Judge Posner’s ruling that denied both Motorola and Apple damages and injunctive relief in Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. This decision not only revived Apple and...

The ITC Has Jurisdiction Over Digital File Transmissions Under Section 337
Alexander J. Hadjis,Chao Huang,Kristin L. Yohannan, April 23, 2014
On April 3, 2014, the U.S. International Trade Commission has issued a notice in Certain Digital Models, Digital Data, and Treatment Plans for Use in Making Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment Appliances, the Appliances Made Therefrom, and Methods of Making Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-833,...

The Federal Circuit Considers Petitions for Rehearing Suprema — Its Decision Defining The ITC’s Authority to Police Induced Infringement
Alexander J. Hadjis,Tihua Huang,Kristin L. Yohannan, April 20, 2014
The International Trade Commission and Cross Match Technologies Inc. requested rehearing of the December panel decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Suprema Inc. and Mentalix Inc. v. U.S. International Trade Commission. In Suprema, the panel concluded that the ITC has no...