Daniel R. Cherry: Lawyer with Husch Blackwell LLP

Daniel R. Cherry

View Daniel R. Cherry 's Martindale-Hubbell Connected Profile
Partner
Chicago,  IL  U.S.A.
Phone312.526.1570

Peer Rating
 5.0/5.0
AV® Preeminent

Client Rating

Featured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer IconFeatured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer Icon
Printer Friendly VersionEmail this PageDownload to My Outlook ContactsAdd lawyer to My FavoritesCompare this lawyer to other lawyers in your favorites

Experience & Credentials Ratings & Reviews
 

Practice Areas

  • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Pharmaceuticals
  • Appellate
  • Intellectual Property
  • Intellectual Property Counseling
  • Trademarks & Copyrights
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Life Sciences
  • Patents
  • Trade Secrets
 
Contact InfoTelephone: 312.526.1570
Fax: 312.655.1501
http://www.huschblackwell.com/dan-cherry/
 
University Massachusetts Institute of Technology, B.S., 1970
 
Law SchoolHarvard Law School, J.D., with honors, 1976
 
Admitted1976, Ohio; 1987, Illinois; 1982, U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit; 1987, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois (Trial Bar); U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 1978
 
Memberships 

Professional Associations and Memberships
• American Bar Association
• American Intellectual Property Law Association
• Chicago Bar Association
• Federal Circuit Bar Association
• Illinois State Bar Association
• Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago
• Licensing Executives Society
• Ohio State Bar Association

 
Biography

an brings more than three decades of legal experience to his clients as a member of the Healthcare, Life Sciences & Pharmaceuticals industry team. He practices in all areas of intellectual property law, with an emphasis on litigation of patent cases. He also works on matters involving patent prosecution, trademark clearance and registration, licensing, negotiations and preparation of validity, right-to-use, infringement and trade secret claims.

Dan's victories for clients in the pharmaceuticals and medical device industries include:
•Litigating the ibandronate Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) case for Apotex.

Before attending law school, Dan was an officer in the U.S. Coast Guard.

Awards and Recognitions
Illinois Super Lawyers, Intellectual Property, 2005
•Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent

Civic Involvement
•BloomTree Learning Community, Prescott, Ariz.

Experience
•Litigated the ibandronate ANDA case for Apotex Inc. This drug is used to prevent and treat osteoporosis
•Defended against $500 million claim of patent misuse. Minebea Co. v. Papst Licensing, 444 F.Supp.2d 68 (D.D.C. 2006)
•Obtained a reversal of a multimillion-dollar verdict of patent infringement involving truck transmissions. Eaton Corp. v. Rockwell International Corp. and Arvin Meritor Inc., 323 F.3d 1332 (Fed.Cir. 2003)
•Obtained a summary judgment of noninfringement for a patent infringement claim against client involving data compression in computer modems. Holtz v. Conexant Systems Inc., Case No. 97-CV-20493 (N.D.Cal.), aff'd, 2002 WL 31875667 (Fed.Cir.)
•Assisted Ohio counsel in persuading the judge to vacate a temporary restraining order that he had previously entered against client and to deny a preliminary injunction in a service mark case. Charter National Bank and Trust v. Charter One Financial Inc., 65 USPQ2d 1684 (N.D.Il. 2001)
•Assisted Florida counsel in obtaining summary judgments dismissing patent infringement and trade secret claims in a case involving jet engine parts. United Technologies Corp. v. Heico Corp., et al., 60 F.Supp. 2d 1306 (S.D.Fla. 1999)
•Obtained a multimillion-dollar jury verdict for client for patent infringement involving hay balers. Case Corp. v. New Holland North America Inc., Case No. 95 C 1225 (E.D.Wisc. 1999)
•Secured multimillion-dollar jury verdict for client for patent infringement and false advertising involving typewriter ribbon cassettes. Smith Corona Corp. v. Pelikan Inc., 784 F.Supp. 452 (N.D.Tenn. 1992), aff'd., 1993 WL 192516 (Fed. Cir.)
•Obtained summary judgments for clients accused of trade dress infringement and breach of franchise contracts. Watch What Develops Franchise Concepts Inc., et al. v. Par Five Inc., et al., 110 F.R.D. 243 (N.D.Ohio 1986), mod., 1987 WL 38109 (SixthCir.)
•Obtained a jury verdict of noninfringement for patent infringement claims against client involving digital noise reducers for TV circuits. Cooper v. Harris Corp., Case No. C-82-1060 (N.D. Ohio 1987)

Business Insights

Business Insights
10.07.14 “Joint Defense and Indemnification,” PLI's Patent Litigation 2014
Healthcare, Life Sciences & Pharmaceuticals Speaking Engagement Chicago, IL
4.22.10 Intellectual Property Seminar
Seminar Chicago, IL
1.01.97 Patent Practice, PRI
Article

 
ISLN908418006
 


View Ratings & Reviews
Profile Visibility
#2,810 in weekly profile views out of 39,925 lawyers in Chicago, Illinois
#111,830 in weekly profile views out of 1,616,736 total lawyers Overall

Office Information

Daniel R. Cherry

120 South Riverside Plaza, Suite 2200
ChicagoIL 60606-3912




Loading...
 

Professional Networking for Legal Professionals Only

Quickly and easily expand your professional
network - join the premier global network for legal professionals only. It's powered by the
Martindale-Hubbell database - over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Join Now