- Antitrust Law
- Environmental Law
- Real Property Law
- Development and Financing
- Real Estate Finance
- Common Interest Community Law
- Commercial Transactions
- Business Formation
- Emerging Business Law
- Natural Resources
- Trade Regulation
University of Colorado, B.S., 1970
University of Colorado, J.D., Member, Order of the Coif, 1981
1981, Colorado and U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
Boulder, Colorado and American Bar Associations; Faculty of Federal Advocates.
Appointed Member and Chair of Committee on Anticompetitive Conduct of Colorado Board of Medical Examiners, 1996-1998; reappointed, 1998-2001.
Everett, Washington, 1948
David M. Packard was employed in various management capacities for large Canadian and American manufacturers before attending the University of Colorado School of Law where he was a member of the Order of the Coif. Dave authored "A Test for Churning in Stock Options" in the Corporation Law Review, a national legal publication, and has taught many professional programs on antitrust law and other subjects. He has served as Chairman of the Antitrust Subsection and as a member of the Business Law Council of the Colorado Bar Association. In 1995 he was appointed by Governor Romer to a three-year term on the Committee on Anticompetitive Conduct, a subcommittee of the Colorado Board of Medical Examiners. He was elected chair of the Committee in 1996 and was appointed to an additional term in 1998. His off-hours activities include rafting, canoeing, tennis, backpacking, skiing and golf. Dave retired from active practice in 2013 and is now acting as special counsel to the firm.
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com