Customer Support: 800-526-4902
 

Donald R. Ware: Lawyer with Foley Hoag LLP

Donald R. Ware

LinkedIn
Partner
Boston,  MA  U.S.A.
Phone617 832 1167

Peer Rating
 5.0/5.0
AV® Preeminent

Client Rating

Featured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer IconFeatured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer Icon
Printer Friendly VersionEmail this PageDownload to My Outlook ContactsAdd lawyer to My FavoritesCompare this lawyer to other lawyers in your favorites

Experience & Credentials Ratings & Reviews
 

Practice Areas

  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Licensing & Strategic Alliances
  • Intellectual Property
 
University Yale College, A.B., magna cum laude, 1971
 
Law SchoolHarvard Law School, J.D., magna cum laude, 1974
 
Admitted1974, Massachusetts; U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit; Supreme Court of the United States
 
Memberships Boston Bar Association; Federal Circuit Bar Association; American Intellectual Property Law Association; Boston Patent Law Association.

 
Biography

Don Ware is chair of the firm's Intellectual Property Department and past member of the firm's Executive Committee. He is recognized by Chambers USA, The Best Lawyers in America, IAM Patent Litigation 250, PLC Which Lawyer? and Massachusetts SuperLawyers for his prominence in intellectual property. A special emphasis of his practice is representation of biopharma companies and universities in patent and inventorship disputes, technology transfer issues, and intellectual property strategy.

Don's patent litigation experience involves a wide range of technologies. He has successfully litigated major cases involving recombinant DNA, monoclonal antibodies, siRNAs, small molecule compounds, drug delivery, molecular diagnostics, research tool patents, and medical devices. Don has also litigated patent disputes in a variety of other fields, ranging from Internet search engines to integrated circuits.

In addition to his trial practice, Don has extensive experience in appellate litigation, including appearances before the United States Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and many other state and federal courts. He also has extensive experience in alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration, both as counsel and as an arbitrator in the International Chamber of Commerce and the International Centre for Dispute Resolution.

Representative Experience

The following is a brief summary of Donald's experience and accomplishments:

· Currently representing Becton, Dickinson and Company in a patent infringement suit brought by Gen-Probe involving methods of automating nucleic acid diagnostic assays and related consumable products.

· Currently representing Biogen Idec in a patent dispute with Sanofi-Aventis involving patents directed to human CMV regulatory sequences. See In re Genentech, Inc. and Biogen Idec Inc., 566 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2009). Obtained summary judgment of non-infringement.

· Currently representing University of Massachusetts Biologic Laboratories in dispute with MedImmune over royalty obligations under technology license agreement covering MedImmune's Syangis® drug for treatment of RSV. Separate actions pending in District of Massachusetts and Maryland state court.

· Represented Johns Hopkins University and Xanthus Pharmaceuticals in Delaware Court of Chancery in a dispute over ownership of intellectual property relating to a novel method of treating autoimmune disorders, resulting in negotiation of patent license.

· Represented University of Massachusetts (UMass) in federal court action brought by Max Planck Institute and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals against three co-owners of patent applications directed to therapeutic uses of RNA interference. Obtained judgment in favor of UMass on all damages claims asserted against it. Thereafter, negotiated global settlement agreement by which UMass became a co-owner of Max Planck's competing patent applications on RNA interference.

· Represented Biogen Idec, Genzyme and Baxter Healthcare in multidistrict litigation against Columbia University challenging Axel patent on recombinant DNA technology, resulting in Columbia's grant of a royalty-free covenant not to sue.

· Defended Becton, Dickinson in a patent infringement suit brought by Enzo Biochem involving nucleotide sequences used in genetic probes. Summary judgment of invalidity was affirmed in Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe, Inc. et al., 424 F.3d 1276 (Fed. Cir. 2005)

· Represented Johns Hopkins University and Baxter Healthcare in patent litigation against CellPro involving human stem cell technology. Won jury verdict of willful infringement and awards of treble damages and attorneys' fees. Judgments affirmed in Johns Hopkins Univ. v. CellPro, Inc., 152 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 1998).

· Author of numerous amicus briefs on behalf of professional and trade associations, including recent Supreme Court briefs in Mayo Clinic v. Prometheus Laboratories, and Microsoft v. i4i.

Professional / Civic Involvement

· Federal Circuit Bar Association, Member

· American Intellectual Property Law Association, Member

· Boston Patent Law Association, Member

· Boston Bar Association, Member

· Chairman, Board of Trustees, American Repertory Theater

· Master Plan Committee, Hopkinton, New Hampshire

Speeches and Conferences

Frequent speaker on patent law issues and biosimilars legislation at conferences and hearings, including: FTC Hearings on the Evolving IP Marketplace; BIO Annual Meeting; BIO IP Counsels Committee; AIPLA; Licensing Executives Society; ACI's Follow-On Biologics (Co-Chairman); ACI's FDA Boot Camp; Windhover's FDA/CMS Summit; NACUA Workshops; Suffolk Law School IP Conferences; CBI's Biopharma Forum, and others.

Publications

· Donald Ware and Nick Littlefield, Follow-on Biologics and Patent Reform, VENTURE CAPITAL REVIEW (Fall 2007)

· Patented research tool infringement - the reach-through royalties risk, LIFE SCIENCES LAW & BUSINESS (December 2004/January 2005)

· Research Tool Patents: Judicial Remedies, 30 AIPLA Q.J. 267 (2002) (cited in Integra Life Sciences v. Merck, 331 F.3d 860 (Fed. Cir. 2003))

· Donald R. Ware and Prof. Janice M. Mueller, A Trial Lawyer's Guide to Presenting Evidence on Claim Construction, 22 THE TRIAL LAWYER 152 (1999)

Industries

Life Sciences

Honors/Awards

Recognized in the 2011 IAM PATENT LITIGATION 250 as a top-ranked individual patent litigator and life sciences patent litigator

Listed in THE BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA for intellectual property law

Recognized by CHAMBERS USA: AMERICA'S LEADING LAWYERS FOR BUSINESS as a top-ranked intellectual property lawyer (2010, 2011)

Recognized by PLC WHICH LAWYER? as a LEADING INDIVIDUAL for intellectual property

Listed in MASSACHUSETTS SUPER LAWYERS for intellectual property

Profiled in IP LAW AND BUSINESS ("The Science Guy," September 2003)

Editor, HARVARD LAW REVIEW, Harvard Law School

 
ISLN902954302
 

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

FDA Releases Long-Awaited Draft Guidances on Biosimilar Product Development
Barbara A. Fiacco,James M. Flaherty,Paul T. Kim,Donald R. Ware, February 13, 2012
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released three draft guidance documents designed to assist industry in developing biosimilars. Biosimilar products are biological products shown to be highly similar (biosimilar) to biological products previously approved by FDA (known as...

FDA’s Draft Guidance on Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity
Barbara A. Fiacco,James M. Flaherty,Paul T. Kim,Donald R. Ware, February 13, 2012
Yesterday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration released three draft guidance documents designed to assist industry in developing biosimilars and implementing the new abbreviated biologics approval pathway under section 351(k) of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCI...

Supreme Court Holds That Facts Underlying Patent Challenge Must Be Proved by Clear and Convincing Evidence
Barbara A. Fiacco,Donald R. Ware, June 22, 2011
In Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, a unanimous Supreme Court held last week that an accused infringer must prove the facts underlying any challenge to the validity of a United States patent by clear and convincing evidence.


View Ratings & Reviews
Profile Visibility
#2,155 in weekly profile views out of 18,799 lawyers in Boston, Massachusetts
#176,267 in weekly profile views out of 1,461,250 total lawyers Overall

Office Information

Donald R. Ware
Foley Hoag LLP
155 Seaport Boulevard
Boston, MA 02210-2600




Loading...
 

Professional Networking for Legal Professionals Only

Quickly and easily expand your professional
network - join the premier global network for legal professionals only. It's powered by the
Martindale-Hubbell database - over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Join Now
 

Affiliations

Lex Mundi