Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results









Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. Washington, DC Document Search Results (110)

 

View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLInvestment Fund Violates “Investment-Only” HSR Exemption
Robert G. Kidwell, Dionne C. Lomax, Farrah Short, Bruce D. Sokler; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 27, 2015, previously published on August 26, 2015
At the request of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”), the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) filed this week in federal court a proposed settlement to charges that an investment fund violated the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976,...

 

HTMLAnother FTC Conduct Case to Bolster Generic Drug Competition: Pharmaceuticals Charged with Illegal Non-Compete for Generic ADHD Drug Sales
Farrah Short, Bruce D. Sokler; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 20, 2015, previously published on August 20, 2015
The Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC” or “Commission”) ever-expanding list of enforcement actions to preserve competition for generic pharmaceuticals just grew in a new direction. This week, two generic pharmaceutical companies entered into a Consent Order with the FTC...

 

HTMLNLRB Calls Out the Punt Team and Declines Jurisdiction Over Northwestern University Football Players
Tyrone P. Thomas; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 18, 2015, previously published on August 18, 2015
In a mild surprise given the current constitution of the Board (read - majority appointed by President Obama), the NLRB declined to assert jurisdiction in ruling on the petition of Northwestern University’s scholarship football players to unionize. However, in a display of special teams not...

 

HTMLSuprema, Inc. v. ITC: En Banc Federal Circuit Confirms ITC’s Jurisdiction to Exclude Articles Based on Induced Infringement
Nicholas W. Armington, Aarti Shah; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 18, 2015, previously published on August 17, 2015
On August 10, 2015, the full US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its en banc opinion in Suprema, Inc. v. ITC, which overturned an earlier panel decision and confirmed, by a 6-4 vote, that the International Trade Commission (ITC) has jurisdiction over allegations of induced...

 

HTMLNinth Circuit Upholds Judge Robart’s RAND Determinations in Microsoft v. Motorola
Sandra J. Badin, Richard G. Gervase, Michael T. Renaud, Bruce D. Sokler; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 17, 2015, previously published on August 14, 2015
Late last month, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its much-anticipated decision in Microsoft v. Motorola, a breach of contract action brought by Microsoft alleging that Motorola violated its commitment to license its standard essential patents (SEPs) on reasonable and non-discriminatory...

 

HTMLDraft Legislation Proposes Favorable Treatment for Intellectual Property Transferred to the United States
Aarti Shah; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 14, 2015, previously published on August 13, 2015
On July 29, Representatives Charles Boustany, Jr. (R-La.) and Richard E. Neal (D. Mass.) introduced draft legislation to the House Ways and Means Committee that would provide favorable tax treatment on certain intellectual property as a means of encouraging U.S. companies to bring their...

 

HTMLClearCorrect v. ITC: Federal Circuit Hears Argument in Case Which Will Decide Whether ITC Has Jurisdiction Over Digital Imports
Nicholas W. Armington, Aarti Shah; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 12, 2015, previously published on August 12, 2015
On Tuesday, August 11, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in ClearCorrect v. International Trade Commission, a case that will decide whether the ITC has the power to exclude intangible items that are imported digitally rather than physically. A decision confirming the ITC’s ability to...

 

HTMLSuprema v. ITC: En Banc Federal Circuit Overturns Panel Decision, Finds ITC Has Jurisdiction Over Induced Infringement of Method Claims
Nicholas W. Armington, Aarti Shah; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 12, 2015, previously published on August 11, 2015
Yesterday morning, the full Federal Circuit issued its en banc opinion in Suprema, Inc. v. ITC and reversed the controversial Federal Circuit opinion that had effectively precluded the International Trade Commission from finding induced infringement in most cases involving method claims. No....

 

HTMLALJ Shaw Confirms ITC’s Post-Suprema Authority to Exclude Articles That Infringe After Importation Based on Contributory Infringement
Nicholas W. Armington, Aarti Shah; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 12, 2015, previously published on August 10, 2015
The International Trade Commission has recently released the public version of the Administrative Law Judge¿s Final Initial Determination in Certain Marine Sonar Imaging Devices, Including Downscan and Sidescan Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-921, Init...

 

HTMLWest Virginia AG Clears Merger Creating Second Largest Hospital Chain in the State with Conduct Remedy
Helen J. Kim, Bruce D. Sokler; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 7, 2015, previously published on August 3, 2015
The federal antitrust enforcement agencies have trumpeted their preferences for structural, as opposed to conduct, remedies as the solution to potentially anticompetitive mergers.[1] In contrast, State Attorneys General have been more willing to enter into conduct remedies, particularly in the...

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  >>