- Civil Litigation
- Real Estate
- Oil and Gas
- Business Law
- Trusts and Estates
Fordham University, B.A., 1972
Hofstra University, J.D., 1975
1976, New York and U.S. District Court, Eastern, Southern and Northern Districts of New York; 1977, Alabama and U.S. District Court, Middle District of Alabama; 1983, Colorado and U.S. District Court, District of Colorado; 1990, New Mexico and Southern Ute Tribal Court; 1992, U.S. District Court, District of New Mexico; 1995, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit; 1999, U.S. Supreme Court
Southwest Colorado, Colorado and American Bar Associations; State Bar of New Mexico; Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute.
Washington, D.C., November 4, 1950
Moot Court. Member, Hofstra University Law Review, 1974-1975. Author: "Plato's Preconceptions," 3 Hofstra 427, 1975; "School Finance Systems," 27 Syracuse 573, 1976; "Psychopharmacology," 2 Hofstra 811, 1974; "In-Kind Gas Rights of Landowners - the Tap May be Free, But it is Not Free From Issues!" Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute, Vol. 51, p. 14-1, 2005.
Burkett v. Amoco Production Company, 85 P.3d 576 (Colo.App. 2003); Amoco Production Co. v. Thunderhead Investments, 235 F.Supp.2d 1163 (D.Colo. 2002); Petrogulf Corp. v. Arco Oil & Gas Co., 92 F.Supp.2d 1111 (D.Colo. 2000); Dunne v. Shenandoah Homeowners Ass'n., 12 P.3d 340 (Colo.App. 2000); Lyon v. Amoco Production Co., 923 P.2d 350 (Colo.App. 1996); Theriot v. Colorado Ass'n. of Soil Conservation Districts Medical Benefit Plan, 38 F.Supp.2d 870 (D.Colo. 1999); La Plata County Board of County Commissioners v. Bowen Edwards Associates, Inc., 830 P.2d 1045 (Colo. 1992); Bowen Edwards Associates, Inc. v. La Plata County Board of County Commissioners, 812 P.2d 654 (Colo.App.1991); Citicorp Acceptance v. Sittner, 772 P.2d 655 (Colo.App. 1989); Cadillac Gage Company v. Verne Engineering, Corp., et al. 203 U.S.P.Q. 574 (Mich.Cir.Ct. 1978).
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com