Aaron Thomas Winn

Experience: Representative Matters: Mislabelling / False Representation Class Actions: Winn has defended clients in various industries from claims that their product labels were false or misleading.; Privacy Class Actions: Winn has defended clients against alleged violations of the TCPA and California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA).; Unfair Competition Class Actions: Winn has defended numerous clients from claims alleging unfair competition, misrepresentation, or fraud.; Employment Class Actions:California businesses have repeatedly asked Mr. Winn to defend them in putative class actions involving wage and hour issues, misclassification claims, donning and doffing disputes, expense reimbursement claims, independent contractor questions, and other employment-related claims.; Banking and ATM Class Actions: Winn has represented several banks and financial institutions in purported class actions alleging misrepresentations and statutory violations.; Real Estate Class Actions:Real estate developers have turned to Mr. Winn to defend them against misrepresentation, unfair competition, and breach of contract claims arising from condominium projects and infill subdivision developments.; Trade Secret Litigation:In addition to his class action experience, Mr. Winn has both prosecuted and defended trade secret misappropriation cases for clients in a host of industries, including the hospitality, medical device, food, energy, banking, consumer goods, and insurance industries.; Lanham Act / Patent Mismarking Claims: Winn defended an international consumer goods distributor against patent mismarking and Lanham Act claims.; Appellate Decisions: Kelly v. Bay Area Toll Auth., No. A164532, 2025 WL 2267679 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2025), review denied (Oct. 29, 2025), (affirming order denying class certification in privacy class action) (counsel for respondent).; Osuna v. Spectrum Sec. Servs., Inc., 111 Cal. App. 5th 516 (2025) (PAGA standing), review granted, (counsel for Respondent).; Ascentium Cap. LLC v. Hi-Tech the Sch. of Cosmetology Corp., 558 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. App. 2018) (affirming dismissal of claims for lack of personal jurisdiction) (counsel for appellees); Lemaire v. Covenant Care California, LLC (234 Cal. App. 4th 860) (consumer class action re alleged violations of federal and state skilled nursing home regulations) (counsel for respondents).; Curtin v. Keenan (June 10, 2014, D064135) (reversing trial court's judgment re application of collateral estoppel doctrine) (counsel for appellants).; Shuts v. Covenant Holdco LLC (2012, 208 Cal. App. 4th 609) (reversing judgment in consumer class action) (counsel for appellants).; Bowers v. Raymond J. Lucia Companies, Inc. (2012, 206 Cal. App. 4th 724) (affirming $5 million judgment and clarifying rules governing binding mediation) (counsel for respondents).; Allen v. County of Stanislaus (9th Cir. 2012, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 14400) (reversing order of dismissal) (counsel for appellant).; Alvarado v. Equity Residential (May 25, 2012, B241451) (dismissing appeal) (counsel for respondents).; Miller v. Lifestyles Senior Hous. Managers (2010, 2010 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 6942) (affirming arbitration award in employment dispute) (counsel for respondents).; Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP v. Ferreira (2009, 2009 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 9342) (affirming trial court's judgment) (counsel for respondents).; Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP v. Koch (2008, 162 Cal. App. 4th 720) (affirming arbitration award) (counsel for respondents).; The above representations were handled by Mr. Winn prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.