Alexander Edward Eisemann

Alex Eisemann has extensive experience representing individuals and corporate entities throughout the United States in civil and criminal litigation as well as government and regulatory investigations. He is an accomplished trial lawyer, having tried dozens of cases to verdict in federal and state court.

Alex is focused on efficiently solving his clients’ problems, whether they involve commercial disputes or contacts with prosecutors or regulators. He has negotiated favorable settlements for his clients, sometimes without the need for any litigation. In the white collar area, he has repeatedly warded off indictments and regulatory charges through sound strategic choices, meticulous preparation and forceful advocacy. When cases are actually litigated, he is equally effective, winning favorable verdicts in both civil and criminal jury trials.

Widely-recognized as a go-to lawyer in the most challenging situations, Alex has helped clients overcome seemingly insurmountable odds to obtain favorable results. Legislators at an impasse in Westchester County, New York, reached out to him when their County Executive refused to comply with laws enacted over his vetos. Navigating difficult separation-of-power issues, Alex secured a court order that forced the County Executive to comply with duly-enacted laws and ended his wrongful use of a contract-approval board to block other legislation. In another matter, Alex obtained an emergency restraining order that prevented a fired employee from selling stolen trade secrets to competitors of Alex's client. He overcame daunting jurisdictional challenges to hold an overseas resort accountable in a United States court for causing the loss of life of a young child who had been visiting with her parents.

With his extensive experience and ability to get up to speed on any issue quickly, Alex is unparalleled in his ability to provide critical analysis and guidance in civil and criminal matters when time is of the essence. The quality of his work invariably surpasses that of the large firms that are frequently his adversaries, at a cost far below what their own clients are paying. He believes legal representation should be affordable and that fees should be reasonably proportional to the matters involved.