Andrew
M. Jaffe, an attorney with a distinguished career spanning back to 1977, has
dedicated over 20 years
of his practice exclusively to E-Commerce and Internet Law. Throughout his
extensive legal journey, he has been a trusted advisor, offering counsel to
clients not only within the United States but also across the globe, navigating
the intricate web of cyber-related legislation.
Mr. Jaffe's commitment to his clients knows no geographic boundaries. He
leverages local co-counsel when necessary to represent his clients effectively
in court, regardless of their location.
Since 2003, Andrew M. Jaffe has immersed himself in the specialized field of
E-Commerce and Internet Law, focusing solely on this dynamic domain. with over 20 years of
hands-on experience in this niche, he ranks among a select few attorneys
nationwide with such profound expertise.
His practice extends beyond legal theory. Andrew has defended over 40 clients
facing allegations related to Internet-based crimes. Additionally, he has
authored an extensive portfolio of documents, including but not limited to
Terms of Service, Privacy Policies, and more. His expertise extends to contract
negotiation, serving both buyers and sellers of websites to craft the essential
agreements. Furthermore, he aids individuals and businesses in managing their
online reputation, helping to remove unfavorable posts from social media
platforms.
What sets Andy apart is his unwavering commitment to providing personalized
representation and unparalleled service to each client. While other attorneys
may possess similar experience, his accessibility sets him apart. Clients never
doubt whether their lawyer will respond promptly; Andy ensures that phone
messages are promptly returned, and emails are addressed immediately.
Representative Cases:
• America Online, Inc. v Ambro Enterprises, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, CIVIL #04-1498
• State of Florida v Scott J. Filary and Donald E. Townsend, Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough County, Florida, Case No. 05-02976
• Microsoft Corporation v Kevin Hertz, et. al, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. CV04-2219C
• Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al. v Downloaditall.com, et. al., United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, #05cv1986
• Microsoft Corporation v KSTM, LLC, et. al., Superior Court of the State of Washington, King County, No. 04-2-35603-2
• My Space, Inc. v Joel Aguilar, United States District Court for the Central District of California, CV 05-2424
• Federal Trade Commission v. Spear Systems, Inc. et. al., United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois 07CV5597
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
