Andrew R. Frisch concentrates his practice in representing individuals who have been denied overtime wages and those individuals injured and disabled in personal injury and workers' compensation cases. Mr. Frisch joined Morgan & Morgan after serving six years with a prominent plaintiff's personal injury firm in the state of New York. He has extensive trial experience with both jury trials and administrative hearings.
Mr. Frisch brings a special brand of compassion and tenacity to every client he represents. He believes that financial hardship and compensation abuses levied upon working Floridians are every bit as injurious as the physical damages suffered in work and other accidents.
Mr. Frisch is admitted to the Bars of Florida (2006), Georgia (2012), New York (2001) and New Jersey (2001), as well as the U.S. District Court, Middle, Northern and Southern Districts of Florida, Eastern, Northern and Southern Districts of New York, District of New Jersey, Court of Federal Claims, Northern and Southern Districts of Texas, District of Colorado, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern District of Michigan, Middle and Northern Districts of Georgia, and Eastern and Western Districts of Tennessee, and the United States Court of Appeals, Third, Fifth, Sixth and Eleventh Circuits.
Mr. Frisch is also the author of a legal blog on wage and hour law. His latest posts can be read here .
News & Insights
Understanding Child Labor Laws for Restaurants and Fast-Food Jobs
Blue-Collar Jobs and Overtime Pay: Know Your Legal Rights
18 Publix managers join federal lawsuit, claim they worked without pay
Publix did not pay workers overtime, former employees claim in lawsuit
Former Amazon customer service rep sues for alleged missed overtime pay
Workers Say Home Health Care Co. Misclassified Them
Pepsi's $13M Unpaid Wages Suit From Kronos Hack OK'd - Law360
Honda Stiffed Workers On Pay After Kronos Hack, Suit Says - Law360
Cargill Must Face Wage Claims Tied To Kronos Hack - Law360 Employment Authority
Hospital Co. To Pay $19.7M To End Wage Suit In Fla. - Law360
Ex-student sues Baylor, alleging retaliation after Title IX probe of former tennis coach
Tennis Player Accuses Baylor Of Title IX Retaliation
New Trouble for Baylor: 700-Lawyer Firm Suing Over Coach's Late-Night Texts
Lawsuit alleges Baylor retaliated against student for role in Title IX investigation
Lee Sheriff's Office ordered to pay ex-deputy $13,000 in OT; stemmed from 2018 lawsuit
4 Pay Mistakes That Lead To Oil & Gas Overtime Fights
Recent Wins
Unpaid Overtime Collective Action Settlement
$13,000,000
Unpaid Overtime, Wage and Hour Violation
2021
Stevens v Pepsico
$12,750,000
Unpaid Overtime, Employment Law, Class Action
2021
Unpaid Wages Class/Collective Action Settlement
$12,750,000
Unpaid Overtime, Wage and Hour Violation
2022
Unpaid Overtime - Mass Arbitration Settlement
$6,000,000
Mass Arbitration
2020
Kutzback v. LMS Intellibound Logistics
$5,281,534
Unpaid Overtime, Employment Law
2022
Private Settlement
$3,995,000
Unpaid Overtime, Wage and Hour Violation
2021
Private Settlement
$3,995,000
Class Action, Employment Law
2021
Private Settlement
$3,050,000
Unpaid Overtime, Wage and Hour Violation
2021
Private Settlement
$3,050,000
Class Action, Employment Law
2021
Private Settlement
$1,800,000
Class Action, Employment Law
2019
$1,600,000 Wage and Hour Settlement
$1,600,000
Unpaid Overtime, Wage and Hour Violation
2023
Private Settlement
$1,450,000
Employment Law
2018
Private Settlement
$1,200,000
Class Action, Employment Law
2017
$960,000 Wage and Hour Settlement
$960,000
Wage and Hour Violation, Unpaid Overtime
2022
Private Settlement
$244,805
Class Action, Employment Law
2018
$200,000 Private Settlement
$200,000
Workplace Discrimination
2025
Caiazza v. Marceno, et al.
$24,361
Employment Law
2020
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
Working with this lawyer is a great experienced. I would love and recommend to others about this lawyer.
See more