Brad M. Dick

Open for Business
Brad M. Dick: Attorney with Bose McKinney & Evans LLP

Biography

Bradley Dick is a partner in the Litigation, Government Services, and Utilities groups, assisting governmental entities, utilities, businesses, and individuals in administrative appeals, litigation, and appeals.

Brad has argued cases before the Indiana Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the Indiana Court of Appeals, United States District Courts, and trial courts across the State and country. Brad also has extensive experience representing parties in administrative hearings and appeals from Boards of Zoning Appeals and Plan Commissions.

Brad also represents government entities and utilities, serving as municipal counsel for cities and towns, responding to public records requests and related litigation, drafting ordinances and resolutions, and representing utilities in a wide range of matters.

Before joining the firm, Brad served as a judicial law clerk for Chief Justice Rush of the Indiana Supreme Court. He graduated from the University of Michigan Law School Magna Cum Laude.

From 2021 to 2025, Best Lawyers recognized Brad as one of the “Ones to Watch” for outstanding performance in private practice.

Honors / Awards

Best Lawyers Ones to Watch - Municipal Law (2021-2025); Indiana Super Lawyers - Rising Stars Edition (2018 - 2019; State, Local & Municipal)

Appearances / Publications

• “Developments in Indiana Appellate Procedure: Rule Amendments, Remarkable Case Law, and Court Guidance for Appellate Practitioners,“ 57 Ind. L. Rev. 795 (2024)

• “Developments in Indiana Appellate Procedure: Rule Amendments, Remarkable Case Law, and Court Guidance for Appellate Practitioners,“ 56 Ind. L. Rev. 653 (2023)

• “Developments in Indiana Appellate Procedure: Rule Amendments, Remarkable Case Law, and Court Guidance for Appellate Practitioners,“ 54 Ind. L. Rev. 767 (2021)

• “Developments in Indiana Appellate Procedure: Rule Amendments, Remarkable Case Law, and Court Guidance for Appellate Practitioners,“ 53 Ind. L. Rev. 805 (2020)

• “Developments in Indiana Appellate Procedure: Rule Amendments, Remarkable Case Law, and Court Guidance for Appellate Practitioners,“ 52 Ind. L. Rev. 617 (2019)

• “Developments in Indiana Appellate Procedure: Rule Amendments, Remarkable Case Law, and Court Guidance for Appellate Practitioners,“ 52 Ind. L. Rev. 617 (2019)

• “Developments in Indiana Appellate Procedure: Rule Amendments, Remarkable Case Law, and Court Guidance for Appellate Practitioners,“ 51 Ind. L. Rev. 925 (2018)

• “Developments in Indiana Appellate Procedure: Rule Amendments, Remarkable Case Law, and Court Guidance for Appellate Practitioners,“ 50 Ind. L. Rev. 1145 (2017)

• Co-author “Developments in Indiana Appellate Procedure: Rule Amendments, Remarkable Case Law, and Court Guidance for Appellate Practitioners,“ 49 Ind. L. Rev. 963 (2016) [Reprinted with permission of the Indiana Law Review]

• Co-author “Developments in Indiana Appellate Procedure: Rule Amendments, Remarkable Case Law, and Court Guidance for Appellate Practitioners,“ 48 Ind. L. Rev. 1173 (2015) [Reprinted with permission of the Indiana Law Review]

• Co-author “Developments in Indiana Appellate Procedure: Rule Amendments, Remarkable Case Law, and Court Guidance for Appellate Practitioners,“ 47 Ind. L. Rev. 969 (2014) [Reprinted with permission of the Indiana Law Review]

• Brad was also a regular contributor to the Res Gestae Civil Case Law Update.

See more ›

Areas of Practice (10)

  • Electricity
  • Governmental Services
  • Governmental Services and Public Finance
  • Litigation
  • Municipalities
  • Natural Gas
  • State and Local Government
  • Stormwater
  • Utilities
  • Water

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
Indiana University - Bloomington, B.A. in Telecommunications, 2003
Law School Attended:
University of Michigan Law School, J.D., magna cum laude, 2010
Year of First Admission:
1900
Admission:
Indiana; United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Memberships:

Appointments / Memberships

Sagamore Inn of Court (2013-2014)
Indiana State Bar Association
Indianapolis Bar Association

Reported Cases:
Representative Matters:Todd Rokita v. Board of School Commissioners for the City of Indianapolis, 23A-PL-02729 (Ind. Ct. App. 2025). Represented the Indianapolis Public Schools in a challenge to the applicability of a law restricting its ability to sell school buildings.; Xirum v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 1:22-cv-00801-TWP-KMB (S.D. Ind. Dec. 13, 2024). Represented Clay County in challenge to jail conditions, district court abstained from hearing state-law claims against Clay County, and dismissed them without prejudice.; Connie Ehrilich v. Bottlebrush Solar Energy LLC, 66D01-2306-PL-00009 (Pulaski Sup. Ct. June 7, 2024). Successfully defended approval of a tax abatement for a utility.; Phillips v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis, 49D04-2202-PL-005209 (Marion Cnty. Sup. Ct. 2023). Obtained summary judgment on behalf of Washington Township Schools in suit alleging trespass, nuisance, and inverse condemnation.; S.E. (by Next Friend Glaser) v. City of Carmel, 198 N.E.3d 1209 (Ind. Ct. App. 2022). Represented City of Carmel in appeal where Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of Carmel that Carmel was immune from liability.; Amberly Pointe Manufactured Home Community v. Stucker Fork Conservancy Dist., 195 N.E.2d 859 (Ind. Ct. App. 2022). Represented utility defending appeal by manufactured home community appealing dismissal of appeal by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, with Court of Appeals affirming dismissal.; Edwards (by Next Friend Glaser) v. City of Carmel, 191 N.E.3d 900 (Ind. Ct. App. 2022). Successfully defended City of Carmel in appeal of attorneys' fee award.; Geist Lake Forest Property Owners' Association, Inc. v. Taso's Toy's LLC, 190 N.E.3d 372 (Ind. Ct. App. 2022). Represented homeowner's association in challenge to structure that did not comply with covenants and restrictions. Ultimately obtained order to demolish the structure and for attorneys' fees.; Ley v. Common Council of City of Auburn, 17D02-2202-PL-00002 (DeKalb Sup. Ct. 2022). Represented Mayor of Auburn in challenge regarding nomination of department heads and obtaining permanent injunction.; State v. Koorsen, 181 N.E.2d 327 (Ind. Ct. App. 2021). Represented homeowners in inverse condemnation action against the State of Indiana.; Burkhart Advertising, Inc. v. Howard Cnty. Board of Zoning Appeals, 176 N.E.3d 594 (Table) (Ind. Ct. App. 2021). Represented Board of Zoning Appeals in appeal by billboard owner appealing dismissal of petition for judicial review.; Tax Analysts v. Indiana Economic Development Corp., 162 N.E.3d 1111 (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). Represented the Indiana Economic Development Corporation in appeal by reporter challenging denial of public records request.
ISLN:
922798283

Peer Reviews

This lawyer does not have peer reviews.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Brad M. Dick

Contact Information:

317-223-0370  Fax

www.boselaw.com/people/brad-m-dick

Required Fields

Required Fields

Clear All Fields

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.