Brittany E. Bakshi

Brittany E. Bakshi: Attorney with Marshall Dennehey

Biography

Brittany has developed valuable litigation experience in several defense practice areas including personal injury, automobile liability, premises liability, property damage and products liability as a member of the Casualty Department. Through her practice, Brittany has represented a variety of clients, including contractors, non-profit organizations, corporations, small businesses and individuals.

Within her diverse practice, Brittany has taken cases to trial, arbitration, and magistrate court and obtained favorable results at all levels. Moreover, she has resolved numerous cases through effective settlement negotiations and mediation. Brittany has represented clients in both state and federal courts.

Brittany earned her juris doctor in 2011 from The University of Pittsburgh School of Law. Brittany attended Franklin and Marshall College where she received her Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology in 2008.

Honors & awards

The Best Lawyers in America , Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
2026

The Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch , Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
2024-2025

Pennsylvania Super Lawyers Rising Star
2019-2025

Year joined

2015

Results

Summary Judgment Obtained in a Pennsylvania Trip-and-Fall Case

Premises & Retail Liability
June 19, 2025

We obtained summary judgment for residential renters in a trip-and-fall case. The plaintiff tripped and fell on a set of porch steps at our clients’ home while attending a barbeque, breaking her ankle. She brought claims against the homeowner. The homeowner then joined our clients, asserting claims of negligence and contractual indemnity under the lease agreement.

Summary Judgment Secured in Slip and Fall Case

Premises & Retail Liability
April 15, 2024

We obtained summary judgment on behalf of a university in a slip and fall case. The plaintiff, a university student, slipped and fell during an active winter storm as she was walking from one campus building to another. Discovery showed that the plaintiff received an emergency alert from the university warning of potentially icy conditions prior to exiting the building and that freezing rain was still falling as the plaintiff was walking.

Defense Verdict Secured in a Three-Vehicle Accident in Pennsylvania

Automobile Liability
March 8, 2024

We obtained a defense verdict following a compulsory arbitration in a motor vehicle pileup. The plaintiff alleged that while she was stopped in traffic, the co-defendant’s vehicle rear ended her, pushing her into the vehicle in front of her. To the contrary, the co-defendant contended that our client caused the entire accident by being the first to rear-end his vehicle, pushing him into the plaintiff’s vehicle just once.

Thought Leadership

Luzerne County Court Denies Amendment to Add Punitive Damages for Post-Incident Conduct in Dog-Bite Case

Harrisburg
General Liability
October 1, 2025
The plaintiff sought the amend her complaint to add a claim of negligence per se, to add a theory of joint and several liability against both defendants and, most notably, to include a claim for punitive damages for post-incident conduct by the de Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2025 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.

New York Appellate Division Affirms Denial of Summary Judgment, Holding Emergency Doctrine Does Not Eliminate Fact Issue on Reasonableness of Defendant’s Speed in Snowstorm Collision

Harrisburg
Automobile Liability
October 1, 2025
The plaintiff brought this action seeking damages for injuries she sustained when the vehicle she was operating was struck by the defendant’s vehicle when it was dark and snowing. Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2025 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.

New York Appellate Division Grants Summary Judgment, Holding Driver With Right-of-Way Not Comparatively Negligent in Police Pursuit Collision

Harrisburg
Automobile Liability
October 1, 2025
The plaintiff brought this negligence action for damages after he sustained injuries as a passenger in a vehicle that was fleeing from police. Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2025 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.

New York Appellate Division Reverses, Holding Biomechanical Expert Testimony on Causation Supports Summary Judgment Dismissing Motor Vehicle Injury Claim

Harrisburg
Automobile Liability
October 1, 2025
The plaintiff alleged that he sustained a serious injury as the result of a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and the defendants filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2025 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.

Pennsylvania Trial Court Holds Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint in Motor Vehicle Injury Case Met Specificity Requirements Under Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(3)

Harrisburg
Automobile Liability
October 1, 2025
The plaintiff alleged in their amended complaint that they suffered “other injuries, the extent of which is not yet known.” The defendant raised a specificity objection pursuant to Pa. R.C.P 1028(a)(3). Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2025 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.

Areas of Practice (5)

  • Automobile Liability
  • Premises and Retail Liability
  • Product Liability
  • Property Litigation
  • General Liability

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
Franklin & Marshall College, B.A., Psychology, 2008; Franklin & Marshall College, B.A., Pre-Law Honors Society, 2008; Franklin & Marshall College, B.A., National Honors Societies: Psychology & History, 2008; Franklin & Marshall College, B.A., Violin Scholarship, 2008; John P. Gismondi Civil Litigation Certificate, May 2011, Societies: Order of the Barristers
Law School Attended:
University of Pittsburgh School of Law, J.D., Murray S. Love Mock Trial Competition, 2011; University of Pittsburgh School of Law, J.D., 2011 Law Review, 2011; University of Pittsburgh School of Law, J.D., University of Pittsburgh School of Law, 2011; University of Pittsburgh School of Law, J.D., First Place, 2011
Year of First Admission:
2011
Admission:
2011, Pennsylvania; 2011, U.S. District Court Western District of Pennsylvania; 2015, U.S. District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania; 2012, U.S. District Court Northern District of West Virginia; 2012, West Virginia
Memberships:

Associations & memberships

Dauphin County Bar Association
Pennsylvania Bar Association
Pennsylvania State Bar a ,a ,a ,

Reported Cases:
Significant Representative Matters: Obtained a defense verdict following a trial in a matter where the plaintiff sustained personal injuries following a slip and fall on snow and ice.; Successfully obtained dismissal of clients from premises liability and personal injury lawsuits after the Court's favorable rulings on Motions for Summary Judgment.; Obtained a client's dismissal in a matter following the Court's entry of a favorable ruling on Preliminary Objections to the Plaintiff's Complaint.; Defense verdicts at the arbitration and magistrate levels in personal injury, property damage and premises liability matters.
ISLN:
923143090

Peer Reviews

This lawyer does not have peer reviews.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Brittany E. Bakshi

Contact Information:

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.